Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa
Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa
518
Summary SAPIERR-II – Shared, Regional Repositories: Developing a practical implementation strategy Ewoud Verhoef 1 , Charles McCombie, Neil Chapman 2 1 COVRA, Nieuwdorp, Netherlands; 2 ARIUS, Baden, Switzerland The basic concept within both EC funded SAPIERR I and SAPIERR II projects (FP6) is that of one or more geological repositories developed in collaboration by two or more European countries to accept spent nuclear fuel, vitrified high-level waste and other long-lived radioactive waste from those partner countries. The SAPIERR II project (Strategic Action Plan for Implementation of Regional European Repositories) examines in detail issues that directly influence the practicability and acceptability of such facilities. This paper describes the work in SAPIERR II project (2006-2008) on the development of a possible practical implementation strategy for shared, regional repositories in Europe. 1. Introduction This paper reports on new impetus being given to a relatively old idea - multinational waste management solutions. Soon after the peaceful use of nuclear energy began to spread in the 1960s and 70s there were proposals for multinational solutions to providing full fuel cycle services to power plant operators. However, for the final steps in the cycle, the management and disposal of spent fuel or radioactive wastes, it was only reprocessing services that were actually implemented internationally. These were provided by countries such as France, the UK and Russia. These countries originally also provided a disposal service since they did not return any reprocessing wastes to their customers. With time, however, a waste return clause was included in new reprocessing contracts – mainly as a reaction to public and political pressures in the reprocessing countries. Interest revived in the late 1990s, driven both by the high costs of geological repository programmes and also by the security concerns associated with the prospect of fissile material being widely distributed across the world. Although several initiatives were proposed, none led to success, partly because the proposed approaches were judged to be premature and too commercial. Accordingly, in 2002, the not-for-profit organisation, Arius (Association for Regional and International Underground Storage), was established to help partner organisations from various countries explore the possibilities of shared disposal facilities. The current growing worldwide interest in initiating or expanding nuclear power programmes also emphasises the need for all countries to have a credible disposal strategy. For many, especially new or small programmes multinational cooperation leading to shared facilities could be an attractive option, since it optimises use of financial and human resources. For the international community, global environmental and security benefits can be achieved by having fewer repositories for spent fuel and/or high level wastes. 519
- Page 484 and 485: load is higher, since the load appl
- Page 486 and 487: [4] Gens, A. & Alonso, E. 1992. A f
- Page 488 and 489: 2. Experimental Methodology A salt
- Page 490 and 491: proof of healing in salt rocks. It
- Page 492 and 493: 476
- Page 494 and 495: obtained experimental results [1].
- Page 496 and 497: dependent shear strength softening
- Page 498 and 499: 482
- Page 500 and 501: elease falls typically between 1 an
- Page 502 and 503: Figure 3: Left: Spent fuel surface
- Page 504 and 505: 488
- Page 506 and 507: 1. Data compilation and evaluation
- Page 508 and 509: Volumetric deformation [%] 20 18 16
- Page 510 and 511: An overview of the test procedure w
- Page 512 and 513: 496
- Page 514 and 515: The works performed within RTDC-1 p
- Page 516 and 517: Integrated Project “Fundamental P
- Page 518 and 519: 502
- Page 520 and 521: The Ruprechtov natural analogue sit
- Page 522 and 523: esults and integrated to develop a
- Page 524 and 525: 508
- Page 526 and 527: 510
- Page 528 and 529: from 12.5 to 13.5, have high ionic
- Page 530 and 531: elative intensity (cps) 8000 6000 4
- Page 532 and 533: 516
- Page 536 and 537: 2. SAPIERR I and II In Europe, the
- Page 538 and 539: after extensive interactions have t
- Page 540 and 541: eing partners if an ERDO is formall
- Page 542 and 543: 526
- Page 544 and 545: 2. Methodology Based on existing da
- Page 546 and 547: external funds ensuring the indepen
- Page 548 and 549: 532
- Page 550 and 551: 534
- Page 552 and 553: Mr Jozef BALAZ JAVYS, a.s. - Nuclea
- Page 554 and 555: Prof. Gunnar Johan BUCKAU Forschung
- Page 556 and 557: Dr Mario DIONISI APAT - Dipartiment
- Page 558 and 559: Dr Paloma GÓMEZ GONZÁLEZ CIEMAT -
- Page 560 and 561: Ms Aurélie JESTIN SOGEDEC Z.I. Dig
- Page 562 and 563: Dr Patrick MAJERUS Ministry of Heal
- Page 564 and 565: Mr Zoltán NAGY PURAM - Department
- Page 566 and 567: Ms Katerina PTACKOVA European Commi
- Page 568 and 569: Prof. Christian SCHRÖDER Universit
- Page 570 and 571: Dr Ján TIMUL'ÁK DECOM Slovakia, s
- Page 572: Dr. Eng. Shuichi YAMAMOTO Obayashi
- Page 575: Publications for sale: • via EU B
518