Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa

Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa

bookshop.europa.eu
from bookshop.europa.eu More from this publisher
10.12.2012 Views

elative intensity (cps) 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 mica (9.9 Å) kaolinite (7.12 Å) Qtz Qtz pyrite (1.63Å) YCW Qtz Qtz Qtz pyrite (1.92 Å) Qtz pyrite (2.7 Å) Qtz 0 20 40 60 °2theta (CuKα) Qtz 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 mica (9.9 Å) kaolinite (7.12 Å) Qtz 0 20 40 60 °2theta (CuKα) 514 Qtz 020 gypsum (7.56 Å) pyrite (1.63Å) ECW Qtz Qtz Qtz pyrite (1.92 Å) Qtz pyrite (2.7 Å) Qtz Qtz 0 days 90 days 180 days 360 days 510 days Figure 2: The unoriented specimen XRD patterns of the whole rock Boom Clay samples after 90, 180, 360 and 510 days of the interaction with YCW (Young Cement Water) and ECW (Evolved Cement Water). The uppermost XRD patterns correspond to the initial (undisturbed) Boom Clay sample. (1) FeS2 + 7/2 O2(aq.) + H2O � Fe 2+ + 2 SO4 2- + 2 H + (2) CaCO3 + H + � Ca 2+ + HCO3 - (3) Ca 2+ +SO4 2- + 2H2O � CaSO4. 2H2O The oxidation of pyrite is accompanied by a release of Fe 2+ , SO4 2- and acidity into the pore water. The acidity is buffered to a certain extent by the dissolution of calcite as inidicated by the reaction (2). In fact, the calcite was not detected in the clay close to the gallery lining in the samples from the Connecting Gallery, while it was present in the Test Drift. On the other hand, the jarosite was found exclusively in the clay core sampled in the Connecting Gallery. The absence of calcite in the core from the Connecting Gallery could point to a lesser buffering capacity of the Boom Clay at this place leading to a precipitation of jarosite, which is only possible at pH

the ECW from 12.5 at the beginning to as low as 5 after 510 days. The most extensive changes occurred in the mineralogy of clay phases interacted with the YCW, namely mixed-layered illitesmectite, kaolinite, chlorite and illite. The fact that the position of the XRD reflections of clay minerals are not changed with time in the alkaline batch experiment suggests that no clay mineral phase-to-phase transformation occurred, e.g. illitization of smectite, but rather dissolution was a dominant process. The dissolution is reflected in the decrease of the specific surface area (SSA) and decrease of the cation-exchange capacity (CEC) parameters. 5. Conclusions Comparing the two data sets from the Test Drift and the Connecting Gallery (HADES URL), the general conclusions could be drawn with respect to the degree and the extent of the oxidation at different times. The mineralogical evidence for the oxidation is traceable within the first ~4.5 cm ahead from the gallery lining both in the Test Drift and the Connecting Gallery. The gypsum as the most common oxidation product of pyrite was found in the both data sets, while the jarosite was found exclusively in the Connecting Gallery. This point to locally different geochemical conditions concerning Eh and pH in the Test Drift and Connecting Gallery. However, there is no mineralogical evidence to state that the ventilation could be an important factor affecting the extent of the oxidation in the the two studied cases. Therefore, the extent of the oxidation is determined by conditions or processes occuring during or soon after excavation, rather than during the ventilation of the galleries during the operational phase. The mineral stability of the Boom Clay depends on the initial base stregth of the applied alkaline solution. The YCW with the original pH of 13.2 induced more extensive mineral changes than the ECW having the initial pH of 12.5. The most significant changes in the mineralogy of Boom Clay caused by the alkaline plume perturbations involve the alteration of Na-Ca plagioclases to Kfeldpsars in the both studied cases and the dissolution of clay minerals (mainly mixed-layered illitesmectite phases) in the YCW. The dissolution of clays is accompanied by the decrease in the Cation Exchange Capacity and the Specific Surface Area parameters. The clay dissolution might increase the Boom Clay porosity and thus increase the hydraulic conductivity in the repository near-field. However, important to note is that based on modelling results of Wang et al. (2007 [4]), the extent of the alkaline plume disturbed zone in Boom Clay is very limited even after 100 ka. 6. Acknowledgements This project has been funded by the European Commission and performed as part of the sixth Euratom Framework Programme for nuclear research and training activities (2002-2006) under contract FI6W-028403. References [1] De Preter, P. (2007) The long-term safety functions within the disposal programmes of ONDRAF/NIRAS. ONDRAF/NIRAS note O/N 207-0526. [2] Wickham, S.M. (2005) The ONDRAF-NIRAS Supercontainer Concept. Galson Sciences, UK (2005). [3] NIROND. "SAFIR-2, Second safety Assessment and Feasibility Interim Report." NIROND, Brussels (2002). [4] Wang, L., Jacques, D., and De Cannière, P. (2007): Effects of an alkaline plume on the Boom Clay as a potential host formation for geological disposal of radioactive waste, SCK•CEN report, ER-28, first full draft, March 2007. 515

elative intensity (cps)<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

mica (9.9 Å)<br />

kaolinite (7.12 Å)<br />

Qtz<br />

Qtz<br />

pyrite (1.63Å)<br />

YCW<br />

Qtz<br />

Qtz<br />

Qtz<br />

pyrite (1.92 Å)<br />

Qtz<br />

pyrite (2.7 Å)<br />

Qtz<br />

0 20 40 60<br />

°2theta (CuKα)<br />

Qtz<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

mica (9.9 Å)<br />

kaolinite (7.12 Å)<br />

Qtz<br />

0 20 40 60<br />

°2theta (CuKα)<br />

514<br />

Qtz<br />

020 gypsum (7.56 Å)<br />

pyrite (1.63Å)<br />

ECW<br />

Qtz<br />

Qtz<br />

Qtz<br />

pyrite (1.92 Å)<br />

Qtz<br />

pyrite (2.7 Å)<br />

Qtz<br />

Qtz<br />

0 days<br />

90 days<br />

180 days<br />

360 days<br />

510 days<br />

Figure 2: The unoriented specimen XRD patterns of the whole rock Boom Clay samples after 90,<br />

180, 360 and 510 days of the interaction with YCW (Young Cement Water) and ECW (Evolved Cement<br />

Water). The uppermost XRD patterns correspond to the initial (undisturbed) Boom Clay sample.<br />

(1) FeS2 + 7/2 O2(aq.) + H2O � Fe 2+ + 2 SO4 2- + 2 H +<br />

(2) CaCO3 + H + � Ca 2+ + HCO3 -<br />

(3) Ca 2+ +SO4 2- + 2H2O � CaSO4. 2H2O<br />

The oxidation of pyrite is accompanied by a release of Fe 2+ , SO4 2- and acidity into the pore water.<br />

The acidity is buffered to a certain extent by the dissolution of calcite as inidicated by the reaction<br />

(2). In fact, the calcite was not detected in the clay close to the gallery lining in the samples from<br />

the Connecting Gallery, while it was present in the Test Drift. On the other hand, the jarosite was<br />

found exclusively in the clay core sampled in the Connecting Gallery. The absence of calcite in the<br />

core from the Connecting Gallery could point to a lesser buffering capacity of the Boom Clay at this<br />

place leading to a precipitation of jarosite, which is only possible at pH

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!