Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa
Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa
5.1 The CARD Project has shown that a Technology Platform is a feasible method of providing a framework for networking and co-operation in the field of RD&D for geological disposal in the EU. In particular the proposed structure and methods of working can meet the identified requirements for networking and co-operation of those organisations that are central to implementation of geological disposal in Member States. 5.2 The CARD Project has established and tested the prioritised needs and objectives of potential participants in the Technology Platform. The resulting database of information provides the basis for production of a Vision Document for the Technology Platform. 5.3 There is a high level of support and good-will for the establishment of a Technology Platform and momentum should be maintained by moving as quickly as possible to its launch. 6. Acknowledgement This project has been co-funded by the European Commission and performed as part of the sixth EURATOM Framework Programme for nuclear research and training activities (2002 – 2006) under contract FI6W-CT-2006-036496. Reference [1] Sixth Framework Programme Co-ordination Action, Proposal 036496, Co-ordination of research, development and demonstration (RD&D) priorities and strategies for geological disposal, Annex 1 – Description of Work, 11 May 2006 408
Summary of the Panel Discussion on the Topic: "Coordination of RD&D for Waste Disposal in Europe" Panel members: Alan Hooper (Chair), NDA-RWMD, United Kingdom Jordi Bruno, Amphos XXI, Spain Vit�zslav Duda, RAWRA, Czech Republic Édouard Scott-de Martinville, IRSN, France Peter Wikberg, SKB, Sweden All five of the questions posed in the Conference Programme were addressed by the panel as follows: � In the context of the shared vision on implementation of geological disposal in Europe, which areas of RD&D in particular would benefit most from a “technology platform” approach (i.e. close coordination between all key stakeholders, agreed strategic research agenda and deployment strategy)? One strongly held view was that the area that would benefit most would be research into physical and chemical processes. It was argued that stakeholder acceptance would be improved significantly if there was greater visibility of a shared view between programmes on what are the important processes and how to address them. Continued research into such processes provides a valuable framework for training and development of the early career professionals that will necessarily come into the field of geological disposal if implementation is to be sustained over the relevant long timescales. The existing bilateral cooperation between Sweden and Finland provides good examples of both such types of benefits. It was pointed out that there is significant interest in the benefits derived from coordination of technology development in the FP6 ESDRED Integrated Project and that technology development projects can provide helpful evidence of the practicality of establishing barrier systems to stakeholders. � Do coordinated RD&D programmes produce some types of results more readily than standalone national programmes, in particular in respect of regulatory confidence and technical quality? It was concluded that confidence is improved when there is evidence of overlap of key issues and the means of addressing them between different programmes and that the technology platform approach should improve visibility of such overlaps, in particular to the regulators. It was pointed out that in many countries the level of acceptance is significantly improved in the light of evidence of meaningful international cooperation on relevant RD&D topics. For this reason, a number of regulatory bodies formally request information on their national programme’s international cooperation programme. 409
- Page 374 and 375: A1: Transport mechanisms Diffusivit
- Page 376 and 377: 360
- Page 378 and 379: maintaining and develop competence
- Page 380 and 381: A project would be justified to det
- Page 382 and 383: 366
- Page 384 and 385: 368
- Page 386 and 387: The main goal of RTDC-1 is to provi
- Page 388 and 389: 3. RTDC3 In RTD component 3 methodo
- Page 390 and 391: lower depths are less saline. For t
- Page 392 and 393: [3] Marivoet, J., Beuth, T., Alonso
- Page 394 and 395: certainty, conducted in RTDC-1 as W
- Page 396 and 397: A simplistic summary might place PA
- Page 398 and 399: There are at least three non-numeri
- Page 400 and 401: 10-11 June 2008. The workshop was a
- Page 402 and 403: Close dialogue between a regulator
- Page 404 and 405: ony, interactions, etc., and to che
- Page 406 and 407: specific sampling strategy, with th
- Page 408 and 409: 2.2.3 Graphical methods Let us call
- Page 410 and 411: 3. The sensitivity analysis benchma
- Page 412 and 413: 4. Discussion and conclusions Three
- Page 414 and 415: 398
- Page 416 and 417: 2. Methodology The project particip
- Page 418 and 419: Closely related to this proposal on
- Page 420 and 421: 4.3 Structure The TP structure must
- Page 422 and 423: 4.5 Implementation It is proposed t
- Page 426 and 427: � What steps should be taken to m
- Page 428 and 429: 412
- Page 430 and 431: 414
- Page 432 and 433: materials. For attaining the stated
- Page 434 and 435: the bottom of the heated press-mold
- Page 436 and 437: 420
- Page 438 and 439: 422
- Page 440 and 441: focuses on the study of the combine
- Page 442 and 443: emitting radioactive waste to study
- Page 444 and 445: 428
- Page 446 and 447: 2.1 Laboratory experiment The dispo
- Page 448 and 449: 3. Results 3.1 Laboratory experimen
- Page 450 and 451: Barrier. Clays in Natural & Enginee
- Page 452 and 453: 2. Experimental data 2.1 Laboratory
- Page 454 and 455: sented in the accompanying poster,
- Page 456 and 457: 440
- Page 458 and 459: situ stress to model the gallery ex
- Page 460 and 461: tive crack network, oriented along
- Page 462 and 463: 446
- Page 464 and 465: ous reasons, SCK•CEN chose to foc
- Page 466 and 467: lery, are already monitoring temper
- Page 468 and 469: [1] Bernier F., Li X.L., Weetjens E
- Page 470 and 471: Concrete The cement used is an Ordi
- Page 472 and 473: Brucite Ettringite 10 �m 8 �m F
5.1 The CARD Project has shown that a Technology Platform is a feasible method of providing a<br />
framework for networking and co-operation in the field of RD&D for geological disposal in the <strong>EU</strong>.<br />
In particular the proposed structure and methods of working can meet the identified requirements<br />
for networking and co-operation of those organisations that are central to implementation of geological<br />
disposal in Member States.<br />
5.2 The CARD Project has established and tested the prioritised needs and objectives of potential<br />
participants in the Technology Platform. The resulting database of information provides the basis<br />
for production of a Vision Document for the Technology Platform.<br />
5.3 There is a high level of support and good-will for the establishment of a Technology Platform<br />
and momentum should be maintained by moving as quickly as possible to its launch.<br />
6. Acknowledgement<br />
This project has been co-funded by the European Commission and performed as part of the sixth<br />
<strong>EU</strong>RATOM Framework Programme for nuclear research and training activities (2002 – 2006) under<br />
contract FI6W-CT-2006-036496.<br />
Reference<br />
[1] Sixth Framework Programme Co-ordination Action, Proposal 036496, Co-ordination of research,<br />
development and demonstration (RD&D) priorities and strategies for geological disposal,<br />
Annex 1 – Description of Work, 11 May 2006<br />
408