Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa
Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa
[3] Marivoet, J., Beuth, T., Alonso, J. and Becker, D.-A.: Task reports for the first group of topics: Safety Functions, Definition and Assessment of Scenarios, Uncertainty Management and Uncertainty Analysis, Safety Indicators and Performance/Function Indicators. – PAMINA DELIVERABLE N°:1.1.1, available via www.ip-pamina.eu. 376
PAMINA – The Treatment of Uncertainty in PA and the Safety Case Summary Daniel Galson and Roger Wilmot Galson Sciences Ltd, Oakham, UK The European Commission’s PAMINA Project (Performance Assessment Methodologies in Application to Guide the Development of the Safety Case) has the aim of developing a common understanding of and improving integrated PA methodologies for the geological disposal of radioactive wastes. A core component consists of research on methods for the treatment of uncertainty in PA and the safety case This paper summarises the overall programme of work on treatment of uncertainty, and the results of an initial international review of the treatment of uncertainty and a recently completed task on the regulatory evaluation of uncertainty. A workshop aimed at discussing the approaches used by regulators in evaluating uncertainties in the safety case was organised by the Swedish regulators and Galson Sciences Ltd in June 2008. The workshop provided a forum for discussion of how regulators can assess and compare quantitative and qualitative lines of reasoning and evidence in safety cases that are subject to uncertainties. 1. Background Development of a safety case for the management of long-lived radioactive waste involves consideration of the evolution of the waste and engineered barrier systems, and the interactions between these and relatively complex, natural systems, such as climate change. The timescales that must be considered are much longer than the timescales that can be studied in the laboratory or during site characterisation. These, and other factors, give rise to various types of uncertainty e.g., on scenarios, models, and parameter values used in modelling, which need to be taken into account when assessing long-term performance of a geological disposal facility. It is important to follow a clear strategy for dealing with uncertainties when developing a safety case. The European Commission’s PAMINA Project (Performance Assessment Methodologies in Application to Guide the Development of the Safety Case), which has 27 partner organisations and runs from 2006 to 2009, has the aim of improving and developing a common understanding of integrated performance assessment methodologies for disposal concepts for spent fuel and other long-lived radioactive wastes in a range of geological environments. Galson Sciences Ltd is responsible for the co-ordination and integration of the Research and Technology Development Component “RTDC-2” of the PAMINA Project. The objective of RTDC-2 is to allow development of a common understanding of different approaches to the treatment of uncertainty in PA, and to provide guidance on, and examples of, good practice on how to treat different types of uncertainty in the context of the development of a postclosure safety case, both as a whole and in specific areas. Guidance on the development of work in RTDC-2 has come from an initial review of key drivers and methodologies for the treatment of un- 377
- Page 342 and 343: 326
- Page 344 and 345: ganic/organic colloids”; WP 4.5
- Page 346 and 347: Figure 1: Schematic of the FEBEX dr
- Page 348 and 349: within feldspars in the three grani
- Page 350 and 351: Colloid Concentration (ppm) 160 140
- Page 352 and 353: form. Clay colloids were detected i
- Page 354 and 355: References [1] Retrock (2005). Trea
- Page 356 and 357: vance on radionuclide migration. Ma
- Page 358 and 359: 342
- Page 360 and 361: The Ruprechtov site, located in the
- Page 362 and 363: Colloid Concentration / μg/l 10000
- Page 364 and 365: exists as a stable mineral phase in
- Page 366 and 367: pared to other sites with SOC-beari
- Page 368 and 369: [3] Hauser, W. Geckeis, H., Götz,
- Page 370 and 371: The science and technology group, r
- Page 372 and 373: FEPCAT RTDC 1 RTDC 2 RTDC 3 Clay-ri
- Page 374 and 375: A1: Transport mechanisms Diffusivit
- Page 376 and 377: 360
- Page 378 and 379: maintaining and develop competence
- Page 380 and 381: A project would be justified to det
- Page 382 and 383: 366
- Page 384 and 385: 368
- Page 386 and 387: The main goal of RTDC-1 is to provi
- Page 388 and 389: 3. RTDC3 In RTD component 3 methodo
- Page 390 and 391: lower depths are less saline. For t
- Page 394 and 395: certainty, conducted in RTDC-1 as W
- Page 396 and 397: A simplistic summary might place PA
- Page 398 and 399: There are at least three non-numeri
- Page 400 and 401: 10-11 June 2008. The workshop was a
- Page 402 and 403: Close dialogue between a regulator
- Page 404 and 405: ony, interactions, etc., and to che
- Page 406 and 407: specific sampling strategy, with th
- Page 408 and 409: 2.2.3 Graphical methods Let us call
- Page 410 and 411: 3. The sensitivity analysis benchma
- Page 412 and 413: 4. Discussion and conclusions Three
- Page 414 and 415: 398
- Page 416 and 417: 2. Methodology The project particip
- Page 418 and 419: Closely related to this proposal on
- Page 420 and 421: 4.3 Structure The TP structure must
- Page 422 and 423: 4.5 Implementation It is proposed t
- Page 424 and 425: 5.1 The CARD Project has shown that
- Page 426 and 427: � What steps should be taken to m
- Page 428 and 429: 412
- Page 430 and 431: 414
- Page 432 and 433: materials. For attaining the stated
- Page 434 and 435: the bottom of the heated press-mold
- Page 436 and 437: 420
- Page 438 and 439: 422
- Page 440 and 441: focuses on the study of the combine
PAMINA – The Treatment of Uncertainty in PA and the Safety Case<br />
Summary<br />
Daniel Galson and Roger Wilmot<br />
Galson Sciences Ltd, Oakham, UK<br />
The European Commission’s PAMINA Project (Performance Assessment Methodologies in<br />
Application to Guide the Development of the Safety Case) has the aim of developing a common<br />
understanding of and improving integrated PA methodologies for the geological disposal<br />
of radioactive wastes. A core component consists of research on methods for the treatment of<br />
uncertainty in PA and the safety case<br />
This paper summarises the overall programme of work on treatment of uncertainty, and the<br />
results of an initial international review of the treatment of uncertainty and a recently completed<br />
task on the regulatory evaluation of uncertainty. A workshop aimed at discussing the<br />
approaches used by regulators in evaluating uncertainties in the safety case was organised by<br />
the Swedish regulators and Galson Sciences Ltd in June 2008. The workshop provided a forum<br />
for discussion of how regulators can assess and compare quantitative and qualitative lines<br />
of reasoning and evidence in safety cases that are subject to uncertainties.<br />
1. Background<br />
Development of a safety case for the management of long-lived radioactive waste involves consideration<br />
of the evolution of the waste and engineered barrier systems, and the interactions between<br />
these and relatively complex, natural systems, such as climate change. The timescales that must be<br />
considered are much longer than the timescales that can be studied in the laboratory or during site<br />
characterisation. These, and other factors, give rise to various types of uncertainty e.g., on scenarios,<br />
models, and parameter values used in modelling, which need to be taken into account when assessing<br />
long-term performance of a geological disposal facility. It is important to follow a clear<br />
strategy for dealing with uncertainties when developing a safety case.<br />
The European Commission’s PAMINA Project (Performance Assessment Methodologies in Application<br />
to Guide the Development of the Safety Case), which has 27 partner organisations and runs<br />
from 2006 to 2009, has the aim of improving and developing a common understanding of integrated<br />
performance assessment methodologies for disposal concepts for spent fuel and other long-lived<br />
radioactive wastes in a range of geological environments. Galson Sciences Ltd is responsible for the<br />
co-ordination and integration of the Research and Technology Development Component “RTDC-2”<br />
of the PAMINA Project.<br />
The objective of RTDC-2 is to allow development of a common understanding of different approaches<br />
to the treatment of uncertainty in PA, and to provide guidance on, and examples of, good<br />
practice on how to treat different types of uncertainty in the context of the development of a postclosure<br />
safety case, both as a whole and in specific areas. Guidance on the development of work in<br />
RTDC-2 has come from an initial review of key drivers and methodologies for the treatment of un-<br />
377