10.12.2012 Views

Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa

Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa

Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

within feldspars in the three granites were comparable but the most interesting difference was found<br />

between the various quartz grains. In some granite where quartz minerals showed no accessible<br />

PMMA porosity, uranium access was subject to the existence of micro-cracks or intergranular fissures.<br />

Figure 2 shows the RBS spectra of Grimsel granite obtained on quartz, feldspar and biotite.<br />

In the Table below, the values of apparent diffusion coefficients obtained for each mineral type and<br />

its porosity are shown. The RBS technique was also used to quantify Cs diffusion on single minerals<br />

in Czech granites [24].<br />

Energy (MeV)<br />

Normalized Yield<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0<br />

Grimsel Quartz + U 1 day<br />

Grimsel Feldspar + U 1 day<br />

Grimsel biotite + U 1 day<br />

Simulations<br />

0<br />

500 600 700<br />

Channel<br />

800 900<br />

Sorption<br />

“Sorption” is the general term used to define an unknown retention mechanism at a solid surface.<br />

RN sorption may take place at the fracture walls, but also on the materials filling the fractures. In<br />

PA, sorption is handled as a reversible attachment of dissolved species to surfaces using the “Kd<br />

approach”. The Kd is experimentally derived, generally from static “batch” experiments under sitespecific<br />

conditions. Pore surface of the rock matrix is considered to dominate sorption, while the<br />

sorption on fracture or infills is minor and neglected in PA. Limitations of the Kd concept are fully<br />

recognised: in particular, the Kd-approach do not take into account the chemistry of the pore solution<br />

and its variability. Besides, other relevant processes as precipitation /co-precipitation and solid<br />

solution formation may be hidden in Kd values. Mechanistic approach to sorption and retention<br />

processes is widely treated in RTDC 1. In RTDC 4, two main problems related to Kd values are being<br />

evaluated: Kd are not obtained directly on intact rocks [1] and, furthermore, the effect of the<br />

heterogeneities is totally neglected.<br />

Different “visualisation” techniques are available to observe the regions in which radionuclides interacts<br />

(e.g. modern autoradiography method [24]), and to perform sorption studies on intact rocks.<br />

The main challenge is to quantify RN retention at a mineral level, therefore sorption experiments<br />

were carried out with small rock pieces using the particle induced X-ray emission technique<br />

( PIXE). A mapping of the single elements on the solid surface allows identifying both the main<br />

minerals present and the reactive areas where the RN is sorbed. The quantification of RN retention<br />

in single minerals can be done only by specific analyses of the individual PIXE spectra in each<br />

scanned point within 2x2 mm 2 areas and this methodology was developed in RTDC4. Small regions<br />

within single minerals can be selected as shown in Figure 3 where uranium is preferentially sorbed<br />

in a biotite. The variability of the surface distribution coefficient (Ka) was analysed as the studied<br />

areas increased. This investigation tried to understand how the distribution coefficients must be upscaled<br />

for consideration of the mineralogical heterogeneity found in any natural system.<br />

332<br />

Mineral Da (m2/s) Porosity<br />

Feldspar (1.5 0.5) E-13 0.5 %<br />

Quartz (1.1 0.5) E-13 0.5 %<br />

Dark minerals (5.2 0.5) E-13 > 1.4 %<br />

Figure 2: RBS spectra of Grimsel granite main<br />

minerals after contact with U solution 1 day: (�)<br />

Quartz, (�) Feldspar and (�) Biotite. Simulations<br />

are plotted as continuous lines. In the table,<br />

the values of apparent diffusion coefficients obtained<br />

for each mineral type and its porosity are<br />

shown.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!