10.12.2012 Views

Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa

Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa

Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 Spent fuel<br />

The release of radionuclides from spent fuel is classically described by two terms:<br />

The Instant Release Fraction (IRF) is assumed to be immediately released under repository<br />

conditions upon contact with groundwater. This concerns mainly the fraction of the radionuclide<br />

inventory located in the gap between fuel and cladding, and in the grain boundaries.<br />

The radionuclides that are embedded in the spent fuel matrix will dissolve slowly as a result<br />

of the matrix alteration.<br />

The main results related to these two terms are as follows:<br />

Instant release fraction and long term fuel evolution<br />

The programme focussed on obtaining new experimental IRF data and on updating the IRF model<br />

developed in the SFS project (FP5, [3]). This model considered both the initial IRF after irradiation<br />

and its potential increase with time. Significant results have been obtained on both aspects.<br />

First, regarding the characterisation of the IRF of “young” irradiated fuels, new IRF values have<br />

been obtained both for high burn-up UOX and for MOX fuel, even though the measured values may<br />

be overestimated due to inclusion of fractions from oxidized fuel surfaces. In particular, these results<br />

seem to evidence that in case of water contact to the centre of the fractured fuel, the rim zone<br />

of high burnup UOX fuel contributes less to the IRF, compared to the fuel in the centre of the fuel<br />

rod, although the opposite was expected. Release of 36 Cl form UOX spent fuel may be much faster<br />

than previously anticipated.<br />

Second, one of the critical questions was whether this IRF will remain constant or grow with time<br />

due to decay enhanced diffusion and fracturing by helium ingrowth. It was demonstrated that this<br />

diffusion process is so slow that it will not significantly increase the IRF. Furthermore, a new micromechanical<br />

model was developed to assess the impact of He accumulation due to decay. Results<br />

show that He accumulation will lead to bubble formation, but for UOX fuel, the critical bubble<br />

pressure will most probably not be sufficiently high to fracture the fuel. Hence the present day surface<br />

area and IRF values of UOX fuel are expected to remain roughly constant with disposal time,<br />

at least in absence of water. The situation for MOX fuels is more complex and still needs to be assessed.<br />

So, NF-PRO has significantly reduced the uncertainties regarding the IRF quantification and a new<br />

pessimistic and realistic set of instant release values has been provided for a number of potentially<br />

mobile radionuclides.<br />

Spent fuel matrix dissolution in the presence of a corroding container<br />

Both studies of the dissolution of UO2 doped with emitters to simulate the radiation field of spent<br />

fuel of a few thousand years, and of real spent fuel were carried out under different conditions<br />

which simulate European deep repository conditions. The following results were obtained:<br />

Tests with doped material have shown very low dissolution rates, calculated by the isotope<br />

dilution method, while the measured 238 U concentrations are very low. For performance<br />

assessment this may imply that under reducing conditions, solubility controlled dissolution<br />

models cannot be used to describe long-term corrosion, and the radiation field of 3000-<br />

10000 y old fuel does not promote the oxidative dissolution of fuel.<br />

Tests with doped UO2 in the presence of bentonite confirm the counteracting effect of dissolved<br />

hydrogen on the UO2 dissolution, but also suggest important sorption of U on the<br />

clay. Hydrogen is assumed to slow down U(VI) dissolution, but not U(IV) dissolution. The<br />

latter is assumed to continue until saturation of the sorption sites of the bentonite.<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!