09.12.2012 Views

Concrete mathematics : a foundation for computer science

Concrete mathematics : a foundation for computer science

Concrete mathematics : a foundation for computer science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

460 ASYMPTOTICS<br />

The graph of B,(x) begins to look very much like a sine wave when<br />

m > 3; exercise 58 proves that B,(x) can in fact be well approximated by a<br />

negative multiple of cos(27rx - inm), with relative error l/2”.<br />

In general, Bdk+l (x) is negative <strong>for</strong> 0 < x < i and positive <strong>for</strong> i < x < 1.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e its integral, Bdk+~ (x)/(4k+2), decreases <strong>for</strong> 0 < x < 5 and increases<br />

<strong>for</strong> i < x < 1. Moreover, we have<br />

bk+l(l - X) = -&+I (X) ,<br />

and it follows that<br />

bk+2(1 -X) = bk+2(x),<br />

<strong>for</strong> 0 < x < 1,<br />

<strong>for</strong> 0 < x < 1.<br />

The constant term Bdk+2 causes the integral sd l&k+l(x) dx to be zero; hence<br />

B4k+2 > 0. The integral of Bak+Z(X) is Bdk+A(x)/(4k+3), which must there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

be positive when 0 < x < 5 and negative when i < x < 1; furthermore<br />

B4k+3 ( 1 - x) = -B4k+3 (x) , so B4k+j (x) has the properties stated <strong>for</strong> i&k+1 (x),<br />

but negated. There<strong>for</strong>e B4k +4(x) has the properties stated <strong>for</strong> BJ~+z(x), but<br />

negated. There<strong>for</strong>e B4k+s(x) has the properties stated <strong>for</strong> B4k+l (x); we have<br />

completed a cycle that establishes the stated properties inductively <strong>for</strong> all k.<br />

According to this analysis, the maximum value of Blm(x) must occur<br />

either at x = 0 or at x = i. Exercise 17 proves that<br />

BZm(;) = (21mm2”’ - 1)‘B2,,,; (9.76)<br />

hence we have<br />

(bn(b4I 6 IBzml. (9.77)<br />

This can be used to establish. a useful upper bound on the remainder in Euler’s<br />

summation <strong>for</strong>mula, because we know from (6.89) that<br />

IBZllJ<br />

(2m)!<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e we can rewrite Euler’s <strong>for</strong>mula (9.67) as follows:<br />

x f(k) = J”<br />

a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!