09.12.2012 Views

Concrete mathematics : a foundation for computer science

Concrete mathematics : a foundation for computer science

Concrete mathematics : a foundation for computer science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How do you write<br />

2 to the W power,<br />

when W is the<br />

complex conjugate<br />

of w ?<br />

pl<br />

I see, the lower<br />

index arrives at<br />

its limit first.<br />

That’s why (;)<br />

is zero when w is<br />

a negative integer.<br />

following <strong>for</strong>mulas:<br />

5.5 HYPERGEOMETRIC FUNCTIONS 211<br />

T(z+l) = z!; (5.86)<br />

(-z)! T(z) = -T-.<br />

sin 712<br />

(5.87)<br />

We can use these generalized factorials to define generalized factorial<br />

powers, when z and w are arbitrary complex numbers:<br />

+= z! .<br />

(z-w)! ’<br />

w= ryz + w)<br />

z<br />

r(z) .<br />

The only proviso is that we must use appropriate limiting values when these<br />

<strong>for</strong>mulas give CXI/OO. (The <strong>for</strong>mulas never give O/O, because factorials and<br />

Gamma-function values are never zero.) A binomial coefficient can be written<br />

0<br />

z<br />

= lim lim<br />

L!<br />

W L-+2 w-w w! (< - w)!<br />

(5.90)<br />

when z and w are any complex numbers whatever.<br />

Armed with generalized factorial tools, we can return to our goal of reducing<br />

the identities derived earlier to their hypergeometric essences. The<br />

binomial theorem (5.13) turns out to be neither more nor less than (5.77),<br />

as we might expect. So the next most interesting identity to try is Vandermonde’s<br />

convolution (5.27):<br />

integer n.<br />

$)(n”k) = (‘i”)~<br />

The kth term here is<br />

T! s!<br />

tk = (r-k)!k! (s-n+k)!(n-k)! ’<br />

and we are no longer too shy to use generalized factorials in these expressions.<br />

Whenever tk contains a factor like (LX + k)!, with a plus sign be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

the k, we get (o1+ k + l)!/(a + k)! = k + a + 1 in the term ratio tk+j/tk,<br />

by (5.85); this contributes the parameter ‘a+ 1’ to the corresponding hypergeometric-as<br />

an upper parameter if ( cx + k)! was in the numerator of tk,<br />

but as a lower parameter otherwise. Similarly, a factor like (LX - k)! leads to<br />

(a - k - l)!/(a - k)! = (-l)/(k - a); this contributes ‘-a’ to the opposite<br />

set of parameters (reversing the roles of upper and lower), and negates the<br />

hypergeometric argument. Factors like r!, which are independent of k, go

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!