2j7YOwO
2j7YOwO 2j7YOwO
REFERENCE TABLES Table R19. Targets for Renewable Power Installed Capacity and/or Generation (continued) Note: Text in bold indicates new/revised in 2015, brackets ‘[ ]’ indicate previous targets where new targets were enacted, and text in italics indicates policies adopted at the state/provincial level. COUNTRY TECHNOLOGY TARGET Yemen Bio-power 6 MW by 2025 Geothermal power 200 MW by 2025 Solar PV 4 MW by 2025 CSP 100 MW by 2025 Wind power 400 MW by 2025 1 India does not classify hydropower installations larger than 25 MW as renewable energy sources. Therefore, national targets and data for India do not include hydropower facilities >25 MW. India 2014–2015 targets are for the national fiscal year, which runs from April 2014 through March 2015. 2 Pumped hydro plants are not energy sources but a means of energy storage. As such, they involve conversion losses and are powered by renewable or non-renewable electricity. Pumped storage is included here because it can play an important role as balancing power, in particular for variable renewable resources. 3 Nigeria’s target excludes hydropower plants >30 MW. 4 The Russian Federation's targets exclude hydropower plants >25 MW. 5 It is not always possible to determine whether municipal solid waste (MSW) data include non-organic waste (plastics, metal, etc.) or only the organic biomass share. Uganda utilises predominantly organic waste. 6 Investor-owned utilities (IOUs) are those operating under private control rather than government or co-operative operation. Note: All capacity targets are for cumulative capacity unless otherwise noted. Targets are rounded to the nearest tenth decimal. Renewable energy targets are not standardised across countries; therefore, the table presents a variety of targets for the purpose of general comparison. Countries on this list may also have primary/final energy, electricity, heating/cooling or transport targets (see Reference Tables R12–R15, R16–R22). Source: See endnote 17 for this section. 176
Table R20. Cumulative Number 1 of Countries/States/Provinces Enacting Feed-in Policies, and 2015 Revisions Note: Text in bold indicates new/revised in 2015. YEAR CUMULATIVE # 1 COUNTRIES/STATES/PROVINCES ADDED THAT YEAR 1978 1 United States 2 1990 2 Germany 1991 3 Switzerland 1992 4 Italy 1993 6 Denmark; India 1994 9 Luxembourg; Spain; Greece 1997 10 Sri Lanka 1998 11 Sweden 1999 14 Portugal; Norway; Slovenia 2000 14 None identified 2001 17 Armenia; France; Latvia 2002 23 Algeria; Austria; Brazil; Czech Republic; Indonesia; Lithuania 2003 29 Cyprus; Estonia; Hungary; Republic of Korea; Slovak Republic; Maharashtra (India) 2004 34 Israel; Nicaragua; Prince Edward Island (Canada); Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh (India) 2005 41 China; Ecuador; Ireland; Turkey; Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand (India) 2006 46 Argentina; Pakistan; Thailand; Ontario (Canada); Kerala (India) 2007 55 Albania; Bulgaria; Croatia; Dominican Republic; Finland; Macedonia; Moldova; Mongolia; South Australia (Australia) 2008 70 Iran; Kenya; Liechtenstein; Philippines; San Marino; Tanzania; Queensland (Australia); Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal (India); California (USA) 2009 81 Japan; Serbia; South Africa; Taipei (China); Ukraine; Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales and Victoria (Australia); Hawaii, Oregon and Vermont (USA) 2010 87 Belarus; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Malaysia; Malta; Mauritius; United Kingdom 2011 94 Ghana; Montenegro; Netherlands; Syria; Vietnam; Nova Scotia (Canada); Rhode Island (USA) 2012 99 Jordan; Nigeria; State of Palestine; Rwanda; Uganda 2013 101 Kazakhstan; Pakistan 2014 104 Egypt; Vanuatu; Virgin Islands (USA) 2015 104 None identified Total 3 110 1 “Cumulative number” refers to number of jurisdictions that had enacted feed-in policies as of the given year. 2 The US PURPA policy (1978) is an early version of the FIT, which has since evolved. 3 “Total existing” excludes nine countries that are known to have subsequently discontinued policies (Brazil, Czech Republic, Mauritius, Norway, Republic of Korea, South Africa, Spain, Sweden and the United States) and adds ten countries (Andorra, Honduras, Maldives, Panama, Peru, Poland, the Russian Federation, Senegal, Tajikistan and Uruguay) and five Indian states (Bihar, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Jharkhand and Orissa) that are believed to have FITs but with an unknown year of enactment. Source: See endnote 18 for this section. RENEWABLES 2016 · GLOBAL STATUS REPORT 177
- Page 125 and 126: MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRENDS BUILDING
- Page 127 and 128: States, new dishwashers use 40% les
- Page 129 and 130: 1990 and 2008, design-related effic
- Page 131 and 132: The Green Climate Fund included in
- Page 133 and 134: appliances, and the country also ha
- Page 135 and 136: 07 FEATURE: COMMUNITY RENEWABLE ENE
- Page 137 and 138: ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURES Organisat
- Page 139 and 140: e a successful means for addressing
- Page 141 and 142: Table R2. Renewable Electric Power
- Page 143 and 144: Table R4. Geothermal Power Global C
- Page 145 and 146: Table R6. Solar PV Global Capacity
- Page 147 and 148: Table R8. Solar Water Heating Colle
- Page 149 and 150: Table R10. Electricity Access by Re
- Page 151 and 152: Table R10. Electricity Access by Re
- Page 153 and 154: Table R11. Population Relying on Tr
- Page 155 and 156: Table R12. Programmes Furthering En
- Page 157 and 158: Table R12. Programmes Furthering En
- Page 159 and 160: Table R13. Networks Furthering Ener
- Page 161 and 162: Table R15. Share of Primary and Fin
- Page 163 and 164: Table R15. Share of Primary and Fin
- Page 165 and 166: Table R17. Share of Electricity Gen
- Page 167 and 168: Table R17. Share of Electricity Gen
- Page 169 and 170: Table R18. Renewable Energy Targets
- Page 171 and 172: Table R19. Targets for Renewable Po
- Page 173 and 174: Table R19. Targets for Renewable Po
- Page 175: Table R19. Targets for Renewable Po
- Page 179 and 180: Table R21. Cumulative Number 1 of C
- Page 181 and 182: Table R23. Heating and Cooling from
- Page 183 and 184: Table R25. National and State/Provi
- Page 185 and 186: Table R26. City and Local Renewable
- Page 187 and 188: ENDNOTES 01 GLOBAL OVERVIEW unfccc-
- Page 189 and 190: ENDNOTES 01 GLOBAL OVERVIEW bbc.com
- Page 191 and 192: ENDNOTES 01 GLOBAL OVERVIEW 76 See
- Page 193 and 194: ENDNOTES 01 GLOBAL OVERVIEW India,
- Page 195 and 196: ENDNOTES 01 GLOBAL OVERVIEW persona
- Page 197 and 198: ENDNOTES 01 GLOBAL OVERVIEW which o
- Page 199 and 200: ENDNOTES 01 GLOBAL OVERVIEW http://
- Page 201 and 202: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 203 and 204: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 205 and 206: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 207 and 208: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 209 and 210: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 211 and 212: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 213 and 214: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 215 and 216: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 217 and 218: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 219 and 220: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 221 and 222: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 223 and 224: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
- Page 225 and 226: ENDNOTES 02 MARKET AND INDUSTRY TRE
Table R20. Cumulative Number 1 of Countries/States/Provinces Enacting Feed-in Policies, and<br />
2015 Revisions<br />
Note: Text in bold indicates new/revised in 2015.<br />
YEAR CUMULATIVE # 1 COUNTRIES/STATES/PROVINCES ADDED THAT YEAR<br />
1978 1 United States 2<br />
1990 2 Germany<br />
1991 3 Switzerland<br />
1992 4 Italy<br />
1993 6 Denmark; India<br />
1994 9 Luxembourg; Spain; Greece<br />
1997 10 Sri Lanka<br />
1998 11 Sweden<br />
1999 14 Portugal; Norway; Slovenia<br />
2000 14 None identified<br />
2001 17 Armenia; France; Latvia<br />
2002 23 Algeria; Austria; Brazil; Czech Republic; Indonesia; Lithuania<br />
2003 29 Cyprus; Estonia; Hungary; Republic of Korea; Slovak Republic; Maharashtra (India)<br />
2004 34 Israel; Nicaragua; Prince Edward Island (Canada); Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh (India)<br />
2005 41 China; Ecuador; Ireland; Turkey; Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand (India)<br />
2006 46 Argentina; Pakistan; Thailand; Ontario (Canada); Kerala (India)<br />
2007 55 Albania; Bulgaria; Croatia; Dominican Republic; Finland; Macedonia; Moldova; Mongolia; South<br />
Australia (Australia)<br />
2008 70 Iran; Kenya; Liechtenstein; Philippines; San Marino; Tanzania; Queensland (Australia); Chhattisgarh,<br />
Gujarat, Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal (India); California (USA)<br />
2009 81 Japan; Serbia; South Africa; Taipei (China); Ukraine; Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales<br />
and Victoria (Australia); Hawaii, Oregon and Vermont (USA)<br />
2010 87 Belarus; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Malaysia; Malta; Mauritius; United Kingdom<br />
2011 94 Ghana; Montenegro; Netherlands; Syria; Vietnam; Nova Scotia (Canada); Rhode Island (USA)<br />
2012 99 Jordan; Nigeria; State of Palestine; Rwanda; Uganda<br />
2013 101 Kazakhstan; Pakistan<br />
2014 104 Egypt; Vanuatu; Virgin Islands (USA)<br />
2015 104 None identified<br />
Total 3 110<br />
1<br />
“Cumulative number” refers to number of jurisdictions that had enacted feed-in policies as of the given year.<br />
2<br />
The US PURPA policy (1978) is an early version of the FIT, which has since evolved.<br />
3<br />
“Total existing” excludes nine countries that are known to have subsequently discontinued policies (Brazil, Czech Republic, Mauritius, Norway, Republic of Korea, South Africa, Spain, Sweden and the<br />
United States) and adds ten countries (Andorra, Honduras, Maldives, Panama, Peru, Poland, the Russian Federation, Senegal, Tajikistan and Uruguay) and five Indian states (Bihar, Himachal Pradesh,<br />
Jammu and Kashmir, Jharkhand and Orissa) that are believed to have FITs but with an unknown year of enactment.<br />
Source: See endnote 18 for this section.<br />
RENEWABLES 2016 · GLOBAL STATUS REPORT<br />
177