09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tantric master from the start, then he would surely be able to activate his feminine side without<br />

needing to use an external mudra. If he could, then all the higher and highest initiations into<br />

Vajrayana would be redundant, since they always describe the “inner woman” as the result of a<br />

process which begins with an “exterior woman”.<br />

It is tempting to conclude that a causal relation exists between both female tantric “partners”, the<br />

internal and the external. <strong>The</strong> tantric master uses a human woman, or at least an inana mudra to create<br />

his androgynous body. He destroys her autonomous existence, steals her gynergy, integrates this in<br />

the form of an “inner woman” and thus becomes a powerful double-gendered super-being. We can,<br />

hypothetically, describe the process as follows: the sacrifice of the exterior woman is the precondition<br />

for the establishment of the inner maha mudra.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “tantric female sacrifice”<br />

But are we really justified in speaking of a “tantric female sacrifice”? We shall attempt to find an<br />

answer to this difficult question. Fund<strong>am</strong>entally, the Buddhist tantric distinguishes three types of<br />

sacrifice: the outer, the inner and the secret. <strong>The</strong> “outer sacrifice” consists of the offering to a divinity,<br />

the Buddhas, or the guru, of food, incense, butter l<strong>am</strong>ps, perfume, and so on. For instance in the socalled<br />

“mandala sacrifice” the whole universe can be presented to the teacher, in the form of a<br />

miniature model, whilst the pupil says the following. “I sacrifice all the components of the universe in<br />

their totality to you, O noble, kind, and holy l<strong>am</strong>a!” (Bleichsteiner, 1937, p. 192)<br />

In the “inner sacrifice” the pupil (Sadhaka) gives his guru, usually in a symbolic act, his five senses<br />

(sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch), his states of consciousness, and his feelings, or he offers<br />

himself as an individual up to be sacrificed. Whatever the master demands of him will be done —<br />

even if the sadhaka must cut the flesh from his own limbs, like the tantric adept Naropa.<br />

Behind the “secret sacrifice” hides, finally, a particular ritual event which attracts our especial<br />

interest, since it is here that the location of the “tantric female sacrifice” is to be suspected. It concerns<br />

— as can be read in a modern commentary upon the Kalachakra Tantra — “the spiritual sacrifice of a<br />

dakini to the l<strong>am</strong>a” (Henss, 1985, p. 56). Such symbolic sacrifices of goddesses are all but<br />

stereotypical of tantric ceremonies. “<strong>The</strong> exquisite bejeweled woman ... is offered to the<br />

Buddhas” (Gäng, 1988, p. 151), as the Guhyas<strong>am</strong>aja Tantra puts it. <strong>Of</strong>ten eight, sometimes sixteen,<br />

occasionally countless “wisdom girls” are offered up in “the holy most secret of offerings” (quoted by<br />

Beyer, 1978, p. 162)<br />

<strong>The</strong> sacrifice of s<strong>am</strong>sara<br />

A sacrifice of the feminine need not be first sought in Tantrism, however; rather it may be found in<br />

the logic of the entire Buddhist doctrine. Woman per se– as Buddha Shaky<strong>am</strong>uni repeatedly<br />

emphasized in many of his statements — functions as the first and greatest cause of illusion (maya),<br />

but likewise as the force which generates the phenomenal world (s<strong>am</strong>sara). It is the fund<strong>am</strong>ental goal<br />

of every Buddhist to overcome this deceptive s<strong>am</strong>sara. This world of appearances experienced as<br />

feminine, presents him with his greatest challenge. “A woman”, Nancy Auer Falk writes, “was the<br />

veritable image of becoming and of all the forces of blind growth and productivity which Buddhism<br />

knew as S<strong>am</strong>sara. As such she too was the enemy — not only on a personal level, as an individual<br />

source of temptation, but also on a cosmic level” (Gross, 1993, p. 48). In this misogynist logic, it is<br />

only after the ritual destruction of the feminine that the illusory world (maya) can be surmounted and<br />

transcended.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!