09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> tantric concept, that power is transformed erotic love, is also f<strong>am</strong>iliar from modern<br />

psychoanalysis. It is just that in the Western psyche this transformation is usually, if not always, an<br />

unconscious one. According to Sigmund Freud it is repressed erotic love which can become delusions<br />

of power. In contrast, in Tantrism this unconscious process is knowingly manipulated and echoed in<br />

an almost mechanical experiment. It can — as in the case of L<strong>am</strong>aism — define an entire culture. <strong>The</strong><br />

Dutch psychologist Fokke Sierksma, for instance, assumes that the “lust of power” operates as an<br />

essential driving force behind Tibetan monastic life. A monk might pretend, according to this author,<br />

to meditate upon how a state of emptiness may be realized, but “in practice the result was not<br />

voidness but inflation of the ego”. For the monk it is a matter of “spiritual power not mystic<br />

release” (Sierksma, 1966, pp. 125, 186).<br />

But even more astonishing than the magical/tantric world of ancient Tibet is the fact that the<br />

phantasmagora of Tantrism have managed in the present day to penetrate the cultural consciousness<br />

of our Western, highly industrialized civilization, and that they have had the power to successfully<br />

anchor themselves there with all their attendant atavisms. This attempt by Vajrayana to conquer the<br />

West with its magic practices is the central subject of our study.<br />

Footnotes:<br />

[1] <strong>The</strong> first known Tantric Buddhist document, the Guhyas<strong>am</strong>aja Tantra, dates from the 4th century at the<br />

earliest. Numerous other works then follow, which all display the s<strong>am</strong>e basic pattern, however. <strong>The</strong> formative<br />

process ended with the Kalachakra Tantra no later than the 11 th century.<br />

[2] A conference was held in Berkeley (USA) in 1987 at which discussion centered primarily on the term upaya.<br />

[3] This cultural integration of the tantric divinities is generally denied by the l<strong>am</strong>as. Tirelessly, they reassure<br />

their listeners that it is a matter of universally applicable archetypes, to whom anybody, of whatever religion,<br />

can look up. It is true that the Shunyata doctrine, the “Doctrine of Emptiness”, makes it theoretically possible to<br />

also summon up and then dismiss the deities of other cultures. “Modern” gurus like Chögy<strong>am</strong> Trungpa, who<br />

died in 1989, also refer to the total archetypal reservoir of humankind in their teachings. But in their spiritual<br />

praxis they rely exclusively upon tantric and Tibetan symbols, yidd<strong>am</strong>s and rites.<br />

Next Chapter:<br />

3. THE TANTRIC FEMALE SACRFICE<br />

Index | Contents | References | Buddhism <strong>De</strong>bate | Glossary | Home<br />

© Copyright 2003 – Victor & Victoria Trimondi<br />

<strong>The</strong> contents of this page are free for personal and non-commercial use,<br />

provided this copyright notice is kept intact. All further rights, including<br />

the rights of publication in any form, have to be obtained by written<br />

permission from the authors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!