09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is by no means new. In the late 1960s in his book Eros and Civilization, the American philosopher<br />

Herbert Marcuse outlined an “erotic” cultural schema. Unfortunately, his “paradigmatic” (as it would<br />

be known these days) approach, which was widely discussed in the late 1960s has become completely<br />

forgotten. Among the basic joys of human existence, according to Marcuse, is the division into sexes,<br />

the difference between male and female, between penis and vagina, between you and me, even<br />

between mine and yours, and these are extremely pleasant and satisfying divisions, or could be; their<br />

elimination would not just be insane, but also a nightmare — the peak of repression” (Marcuse, 1965,<br />

p. 239). This nightmare becomes real in the alchemic practices of the Buddhist tradition. In that<br />

Vajrayana dissolves all differences, ultimately even the polarity of the sexes, into the androgynous<br />

principle of the ADI BUDDHA, it destroys the “Eros” of life, even though it paradoxically recognizes<br />

this sexual polarity as the supreme cosmic force.<br />

As we were working on the final proofs of our manuscript, the German magazine Bunte, which only a<br />

few weeks before had celebrated the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a as a god on earth, carried an article by the cultural<br />

sociologist Nicolaus Sombart entitled “<strong>De</strong>sire for the divine couple”. Sombart so precisely expressed<br />

our own ideas that we would like to quote him at length. “Why does the human project have a<br />

bipartite form in the divine plan? <strong>The</strong> duality symbolizes the polarity of the world, the bipolarity that<br />

is the basis for the dyn<strong>am</strong>ic of everything which happens in the world. Yin and yang. Apparently<br />

divided and yet belonging together, contradictory, and complementary, antagonistic but designed for<br />

harmony, synthesis and symbiosis. Only in mutual penetration do they complete each other and<br />

become whole. <strong>The</strong> model of the world is that of a couple eternally striving for union. <strong>The</strong> cosmic<br />

couple stand by one another in the interaction of an erotic tension. It is a pair of lovers. <strong>The</strong> misery of<br />

the world lies in the separation, isolation, and loneliness of the parts that are attracted to each other,<br />

that belong together; the joy and happiness lie in the union of the two sexes; not two souls, this is not<br />

enough, but two bodies equipped for this purpose — a pleasurable foretaste of the return to<br />

paradise” (Bunte, 46/1998, p. 40).<br />

It is nonetheless remarkable how unsuccessful mystic gendered love has been in establishing itself as<br />

a religious archetype in human cultural history. Although the mystery of love between man and<br />

woman is and has been practised and experienced by millions, although most cultures have both male<br />

and female deities, the unio mystica of the sexes has largely not been recognized as a religion. Yet<br />

there is so much which indicates that the harmony and love between man and woman (god and<br />

goddess) could be granted the gravity of a universal paradigm and become a bridge of peace between<br />

the various cultures. Selected insights and images from the mysteries of Tantric Buddhism ought to be<br />

most useful in the development of such a paradigm.<br />

Divine couples are found in all cultures, even if their religious veneration is not <strong>am</strong>ong the central<br />

mysteries. We also encounter them in the pre-Buddhist mythologies of Tibet, where the two sexes<br />

share their control over the world equally. Matthias Hermanns tells us about Khen pa, the ruler of the<br />

heavens, and Khon ma, the earth mother, and quotes the following sentence from an aboriginal<br />

Tibetan creation myth: “At first heaven and earth are like father and mother” (Hermanns, 1965, p. 72).<br />

In the times of the original Tibetan kings there was a god of man (pho-lha) and a goddess of woman<br />

(mo-lha). A number of Central Asian myths see the sun and moon as equal forces, with the sun<br />

playing the masculine and the moon the feminine role (Bleichsteiner, 1937, p.19). In one Bon myth,<br />

light and darkness are held to be the primordial cosmic couple (Paul, 1981, p. 49).<br />

In Tantric Buddhism, the central Buddhist couple celebrated by the Nyingmapa School,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!