09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

persecuted the Bon followers for centuries. In answer to a question about his attitude to Tibetan<br />

Buddhism he replied, “Seen historically, a merciless war has in fact long been conducted between us<br />

two. … Between the 7th and the 20th century a good four fifths of Tibet was Buddhist. Sometimes<br />

this also meant violence: hence, in the 18th century, with the help of the Chinese, the Gelugpa carried<br />

out mass conversions in the border regions of Tibet which had long been inhabited by the<br />

Bon” (quoted by Eersel and Grosrey, 1998, p. 141). Still today, the Bonpos are disadvantaged in<br />

many ways: “You should be aware, for instance, that non-Buddhist children do not see a penny of the<br />

money donated by international aid organizations for Tibetan children!” Nyima Rinpoche protested<br />

(quoted by Eersel and Grosrey, 1998, p. 132).<br />

But the Kundun knows how to deal with such matters. <strong>The</strong> next day he lets the Bon critic sit beside<br />

him, and declares the Bonpos to be “Tibet’s fifth school”. In his pride, Nyima Rinpoche forgot about<br />

any criticism or the history of the repression of his religion. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a takes the African voodoo<br />

representative, Daagpo Hounon Houna, in his arms and has a photo taken. <strong>The</strong> two book authors<br />

comment that, “Back home in Africa this picture will certainly receive great symbolic status” (Eersel<br />

and Grosley, 1998, p. 132). <strong>The</strong>n the Kundun says some moving words about “Mother Earth” he has<br />

learned from the New Age milieu and which as such do not exist in the Tibetan tradition: “<strong>The</strong>se days<br />

we have too little contact to Mother Earth and in this we forget that we ourselves are a part of nature.<br />

We are cildren of nature, Mother Earth, and this planet is our only home” (quoted by Eersel and<br />

Grosrey, 1998, p. 180). Let us recall that before the start of every Kalachakra ritual the earth spirits<br />

are nailed down with a ritual dagger. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a goes on to preach about the variety of races and<br />

the equality of the religions of the world. And he has already won the hearts of all. It is naturally his<br />

congress, he is the axis around which the “circle of elders” revolves.<br />

Roughly in the middle of the book we suddenly learn that the delegates were invited in his n<strong>am</strong>e and<br />

that “without the support and the exceptional aura of His Holiness” nothing would have been possible<br />

(Eersel and Grosrey, 1998, p. 253). Even the high priest from Benin, who smuggled the remains of an<br />

animal sacrifice into the ritual temple that was, however, discovered and removed, accepts the Tibetan<br />

hierarch as the central figure of the meeting, saying “I therefore greet His Holiness the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a<br />

around whom we have gathered here” (Eersel and Grosrey, 1998, p. 199). One of the organizers(Jean-<br />

Claude Carrière) sums things up: “That was actually the motor of this meeting. Here for the first time<br />

peoples, some of whom have almost vanished from the face of the earth, were asked to speak (and<br />

act) and they have recognized the likewise degraded, disowned, and exiled <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a as one of their<br />

own. It is barely imaginable how important it was for them to be able to bow before him and present<br />

him with a gift” (Eersel and Grosrey, 1998, p. 254). Tibetan Buddhism is becoming a catch-all for all<br />

religions: “If the meeting of the United Traditions took place in a Buddhist monastery, it is surely<br />

because the spirit of the Way of Buddha, as embodied by His Holiness the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a, encourages<br />

such meetings. His presence alongside the elders and the role of unifier which was accorded him on<br />

the Day of the United Traditions, is in the s<strong>am</strong>e category as the suggestions that he made in front of<br />

the assembled Christians in 1994 …” (Eersel and Grosrey, 1998, p. 406). Thus L<strong>am</strong>aism plays the<br />

tune to which those attending dance: “A more astonishing vision, in which we here, borne along by<br />

the songs and drums of the Tibetans, begin to ‘rotate’ along with the Asian sh<strong>am</strong>ans, African high<br />

priests, American and Australian men and women of knowledge” (Eersel and Grosrey, 1998, p. 176).<br />

This meeting made two things apparent: firstly, that the traditions of the native peoples are<br />

fund<strong>am</strong>entally uninterested in a process of criticism or self-criticism, and secondly, that here too the<br />

<strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a assumes spiritual leadership as a “king sh<strong>am</strong>an”. A line from the joint closing prayer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!