09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and Marx in the material; what alliance could be more fruitful?” (Hicks and Chogy<strong>am</strong>, 1990, p. 143);<br />

“I believe firmly there is common ground between communism and Buddhism” (Grunfeld, 1996, p.<br />

188); “Normally I describe myself as half Marxist, half monk” (Zeitmagazin 1988, no. 44, p. 24;<br />

retranslation). He is even known to have made a plea for a communist economic policy: “As far as the<br />

economy is concerned, the Marxist theory could possibly complement Buddhism...” (Levenson, 1992,<br />

p. 334). It is thus no wonder that at the god-king’s suggestion , the “Communist Party of Tibet” was<br />

founded. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a has become a left-wing revolutionary even by the standards of those<br />

western nostalgics who mourn the passing of communism.<br />

Up until in the eighties the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a’s concern was to create via such comments a good<br />

relationship with the Soviet Union, which had since the sixties become embroiled in a dangerous<br />

conflict with China. As we have seen, even the envoy of the Thirteenth <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a, Agvan Dorjiev,<br />

was a master at changing political fronts as he switched from the Tsar to Lenin without a problem<br />

following the Bolshevist seizure of power. Yet it is interesting that His Holiness has to continued to<br />

make such pro-Marxist statements after the collapse of most communist systems. Perhaps this is for<br />

ethical reasons, or because China at least ideologically continues to cling to its communist past?<br />

<strong>The</strong>se days through such statements the Kundun wants to keep open the possibility of a return to Tibet<br />

under Chinese control. In 1997 in Taiwan he explained that he was neither anti-Chinese nor anticommunist<br />

(Tibetan Review, May 1997, p. 14). He even criticized China because it had stepped back<br />

from its Marxist theory of economics and the gulf between rich and poor is thus becoming ever wider<br />

(Martin Scheidegger, speaking at the Gesellschaft Schweizerisch Tibetische Freundschaft [Society for<br />

Swiss-Tibetan Friendship], August 18, 1997).<br />

Are the Chinese interested in the Sh<strong>am</strong>bhala myth?<br />

Do the Chinese have an interest in the Kalachakra Tantra and the Sh<strong>am</strong>bhala myth? Let us repeat,<br />

since time immemorial China and Tibet have oriented themselves to a mythic conception of history<br />

which is not immediately comprehensible to Americans or Europeans. Almost nobody here wants to<br />

believe that this archaic way of thinking continued to exist, even increased, under “materialistic”<br />

communism. For a Westerner, China today still represents “the land of materialism” vis-à-vis Tibet as<br />

“the land of spirituality”. <strong>The</strong>re are, however, rare exceptions who avoid this cliché, such as Hugh<br />

Richardson for ex<strong>am</strong>ple, who establishes the following in his history of Tibet: “<strong>The</strong> Chinese have ... a<br />

profound regard for history. But history, for them was not simply a scientific study. It had the features<br />

of a cult, akin to ancestor worship, with the ritual object of presenting the past, favorably emended<br />

and touched up, as a model for current political action. It had to conform also to the mystical view of<br />

China as the Centre of the World, the Universal Empire in which every other country had a natural<br />

urge to become a part … <strong>The</strong> Communists … were the first Chinese to have the power to convert<br />

their atavistic theories into fact” (quoted by Craig, 1997, p. 146).<br />

If it was capable of surviving communism, this mythically based understanding of history will hardly<br />

disappear with it. In contrast, religious revivals are now running in parallel to the flourishing<br />

establishment of capitalist economic systems and the increasing mechanization of the country.<br />

Admittedly the Han Chinese are as a people very much oriented to material things, and Confucianism<br />

which has regained respectability in the last few years counts as a philosophy of reason not a religion.<br />

But history has demonstrated that visionary and ecstatic cults from outside were able to enter China<br />

with ease. <strong>The</strong> Chinese power elite have imported their religious-political ideas from other cultures<br />

several times in the past centuries. Hence the Middle Kingdom is historically prepared for such

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!