09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong>re is a simple reason for Dorjiev’s enthusiasm for Russia. He was convinced that the Kalachakra<br />

system and the Sh<strong>am</strong>bhala myth had their origins in the Empire of the Tsar and would return via it. In<br />

1901 the Buriat had received initiations into the Time Tantra from the Ninth Panchen L<strong>am</strong>a which<br />

were supposed to have been of central significance for his future vision. Ekai Kawaguchi, a Buddhist<br />

monk from Japan who visited Tibet at the turn of the last century, claims to have heard of a p<strong>am</strong>phlet<br />

in which Dorjiev wrote “Sh<strong>am</strong>bhala was Russia. <strong>The</strong> Emperor, moreover, was an incarnation of<br />

Tsongkhapa, and would sooner or later subdue the whole world and found a gigantic Buddhist<br />

empire” (Snelling, 1993, p. 79). Although it is not certain whether the l<strong>am</strong>a really did write this<br />

document, it fits in with his religious-political ideas. Additionally, the historians are agreed: “In my<br />

opinion,” W.A. Unkrig writes, “the religiously-based purpose of Agvan Dorjiev was the foundation of<br />

a L<strong>am</strong>aist-oriented kingdom of the Tibetans and Mongols as a theocracy under the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a ...<br />

[and] under the protection of Tsarist Russia ... In addition, <strong>am</strong>ong the L<strong>am</strong>aists there existed the<br />

religiously grounded hope for help from a ‘Messianic Kingdom’ in the North ... called 'Northern<br />

Sh<strong>am</strong>bhala’” (quoted by Snelling, 1993, p. 79).<br />

At the center of Dorjiev’s activities in Russia stood the construction of a three-dimensional mandala<br />

— the Buddhist temple in St. Petersburg. <strong>The</strong> shrine was dedicated to the Kalachakra deity. <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a’s envoy succeeded in bringing together a respectable number of prominent Russians who<br />

approved of and supported the project. <strong>The</strong> architects c<strong>am</strong>e from the West. A painter by the n<strong>am</strong>e of<br />

Nicholas Roerich, who later bec<strong>am</strong>e a fanatic propagandist for Kalachakra doctrine, produced the<br />

designs for the stained-glass windows. Work commenced in 1909. In the central hall various main<br />

gods from the Tibetan pantheon were represented with statues and pictures, including <strong>am</strong>ong others<br />

Dorjiev’s wrathful initiation deity, Vajrabhairava. Regarding the décor, it is perhaps also of interest<br />

that there was a swastika motif which the Bolsheviks knocked out during the Second World War.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was sufficient room for several l<strong>am</strong>as, who looked after the ritual life, to live on the grounds.<br />

Dorjiev had originally intended to triple the staffing and to construct not just a temple but also a<br />

whole monastery. This was prevented, however, by the intervention of the Russian Orthodox Church.<br />

<strong>The</strong> inauguration took place in 1915, an important social event with numerous figures from public life<br />

and the official representatives of various Asian countries. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a sent a powerful<br />

delegation, “to represent the Buddhist Papacy and assist the Tibetan Envoy Dorjiev” (Snelling, 1993,<br />

p. 159). Nicholas II had already viewed the Kalachakra temple privately together with members of<br />

his f<strong>am</strong>ily several days before the official occasion.<br />

<strong>Of</strong>ficially, the shrine was declared to be a place for the needs of the Buriat and Kalmyk minorities in<br />

the capital. With regard to its occult functions it was undoubtedly a tantric mandala with which the<br />

Kalachakra system was to be transplanted into the West. <strong>The</strong>n, as we have already explained, from<br />

the l<strong>am</strong>as’ traditional point of view founding a temple is seen as an act of spiritual occupation of a<br />

territory. <strong>The</strong> legends about the construction of first Buddhist monastery (S<strong>am</strong>ye) on Tibetan soil<br />

show that it is a matter of a symbolic deed with which the victory of Buddhism over the native gods<br />

(or demons) is celebrated. Such sacred buildings as the Kalachakra temple in St. Petersburg are<br />

cosmogr<strong>am</strong>s which are — in their own way of seeing things — employed by the l<strong>am</strong>as as magic seals<br />

in order to spiritually subjugate countries and peoples. It is in this sense that the Italian, Fosco<br />

Maraini, has also described the monasteries in his poetic travelogue about Tibet as “factories of a holy<br />

technology or laboratories of spiritual science” (Maraini, 1952, p. 172). In our opinion this<br />

approximates very closely the L<strong>am</strong>aist self-concept. Perhaps it is also the reason why the Bolsheviks<br />

later housed an evolutionary technology laboratory in the confiscated Kalachakra shrine of St.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!