09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ebel, a popular hero, a poète maudit, a Bohemian, a romantic on the divine throne, an affectionate<br />

eroticist, as clever and attractive. <strong>The</strong> others, who view him with disgust, hold him to be a heretic and<br />

besmircher of the Lion Throne, reckless and depraved. Both groups nonetheless describe him as<br />

extremely apolitical.<br />

He bec<strong>am</strong>e well-known and notorious above all through his love poems, which he dedicated to<br />

several attractive inhabitants of Lhasa. <strong>The</strong>ir self ironic touch, melancholy and subtle mockery of the<br />

bureaucratic L<strong>am</strong>aist state have earned them a place in the literature of the world. For ex<strong>am</strong>ple, the<br />

following five-line poem combines all three elements:<br />

When I’m at the Potala Monastery<br />

<strong>The</strong>y call me the Learned Ocean of Pure Song;<br />

When I sport in the town,<br />

I’<strong>am</strong> known as the Handsome Rogue who loves Sex!.<br />

(quoted by Stevens, 1990, p. 78)<br />

<strong>The</strong> young “poet prince” stood in impotent opposition to the reigning regent, Sangye Gyatso (1653-<br />

1705), who claimed the power of state for himself alone. <strong>The</strong> relationship between the two does not<br />

lack a certain piquancy if, following Helmut Hoffmann, one assumes that the regent was the<br />

biological son of the “Great Fifth” and thus stood opposed to the Sixth <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a as the youthful<br />

incarnation of his own father. Nevertheless, this did not prevent him from treating the young “godking”<br />

as a marionette in his power play with the Chinese and Mongolians. When the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a<br />

expressed own claim to authority, his “sinful activities “ were suddenly found to be so offensive that<br />

his abdication was demanded.<br />

Oddly enough the sixth Kundun accepted this without great pause, and in the year 1702 decided to<br />

hand his spiritual office over to the Panchen L<strong>am</strong>a; his worldly authority, however, which he de jure<br />

but never de facto exercised, he wanted to retain. This plan did not come to fruition, however. A<br />

congregation of priests determined that the spirit of Avalokiteshvara had left him and appointed an<br />

opposing candidate. In the general political confusion which now spread through the country, in<br />

which the regent, Sangye Gyatso, lost his life, the 24-year-old Sixth <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a was also murdered.<br />

Behind the deed lay a conspiracy between the Chinese Emperor and the Mongolian Prince, Lhabsang<br />

Khan. Nonetheless, according to a widely distributed legend, the “god-king” was not killed but lived<br />

on anonymously as a beggar and pilgrim and was said to have still appeared in the country under his<br />

subsequent incarnation, the Seventh <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a.<br />

Western historians usually see a tragic aesthete in the figure of the poet prince, who with his erotic<br />

lines agreeably broke through the merciless power play of the great l<strong>am</strong>as. We are not entirely<br />

convinced by this view. In contrast, in our view Tsangyang Gyatso was all but dying to attain and<br />

exercise worldly power in Tibet, as was indeed his right. It is just that to this end he did not make use<br />

of the usual political means, believing instead that he could achieve his goal by practicing sexual<br />

magic rites. He firmly believed in what stood in the holy texts of the tantras; he was convinced that<br />

could gain power over the state via “sexual anarchy”.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most important piece of information which identifies him as a practicing Tantric is the muchquoted<br />

saying of his: „Although I sleep with a woman every night, I never lose a drop of<br />

semen” (quoted by Stevens, 1990, p. 78). With this statement he not only justified his scandalous

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!