09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

All of the stories about the Maha Siddhas tell of the spectacular adventures they had to go through to<br />

attain their goal of enlightenment (i.e., the ritual absorption of gynergy). Had they succeeded in this,<br />

then they could refer to themselves as “masters of the maha mudra”. <strong>The</strong> number of 84 does not<br />

correspond to any historical reality. Rather, we are dealing with a mystical number here which in<br />

symbolizes perfection in several Indian religious systems. Four of the Maha Siddhas were women.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y all lived in India between the eighth and twelfth centuries.<br />

<strong>The</strong> majority of these grand sorcerers c<strong>am</strong>e from the lower social strata. <strong>The</strong>y were originally<br />

fishermen, weavers, woodcutters, gardeners, bird-catchers, beggars, servants, or similar. <strong>The</strong> few who<br />

were members of the higher castes — the kings, brahmans, abbots, and university lecturers — all<br />

abandoned their privileges so as to lead the life of the mendicant wandering yogis as “drop-outs”. But<br />

their biographies have nothing in common with the pious Christian legends — they are violent, erotic,<br />

demonic, and grotesque. <strong>The</strong> American, Keith Dowman, stresses the rebellious character of these<br />

unholy holy men: „Some of these Siddhas are iconoclasts, dissenters, anti-establishment rebels. [...]<br />

Obsessive caste rules and regulations in society and religious ritual as an end in itself, were<br />

undermined by the siddhas’ exemplary free living” (Dowman, 1985, pp. 2). Dowman explicitly refers<br />

to their lifestyle as „spiritual anarchism” which did not allow of any control by institutionalism<br />

(Dowman, 1985, p. 3).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!