09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Shadow</strong> of the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a – Part II – 5. Buddhocracy and anarchy: contradictory or<br />

complementary?<br />

© Victor & Victoria Trimondi<br />

5. BUDDHOCRACY AND ANARCHY:<br />

CONTRATICTORY OR COMPLEMENTRAY?<br />

<strong>The</strong> grand sorcerers (Maha Siddhas)<br />

<strong>The</strong> anarchistic founding father of Tibetan Buddhism: Padmas<strong>am</strong>bhava<br />

From anarchy to discipline of the order: the Tilopa lineage<br />

<strong>The</strong> pre-ordained counter world to the clerical bureaucracy: holy fools<br />

An anarchistic erotic: the VI <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a<br />

A tantric history of Tibet<br />

Crazy wisdom and the West<br />

<strong>The</strong> totalitarian L<strong>am</strong>aist state (the Tibetan Buddhocracy), headed by its absolute ruler, the <strong>Dalai</strong><br />

L<strong>am</strong>a, was — as contradictory as this may at first appearance seem to be — only one of the powerpolitical<br />

forces which decisively shaped the history of Tibet. On the other side we find all the<br />

disintegrative and anti-state forces which constantly challenged the clerical sphere as dangerous<br />

opponents. As we shall soon see, within the whole social structure they represented the forces of<br />

anarchy: „Thus, Tibetans understand power both“, writes Rebecca Redwood French, „as a highly<br />

centralized, rigidly controlled and hierarchically determined force and as a diffuse and multivalent<br />

force” (Redwood French, 1995, p. 108). What are these „diffuse and multivalent” forces and how<br />

does the „highly centralized … and hierarchically determined” Buddhist state deal with them?<br />

<strong>The</strong> powers which rebelled against the established monastic order in the Tibet of old were legion —<br />

above all the all-powerful nature of the country. Extreme climatic conditions and the huge territory,<br />

barely developed in terms of transport logistics, rendered effective state control by the l<strong>am</strong>as only<br />

partially realizable. But the problems were not just of the factual kind. In addition, from the Tibetan,<br />

animist point of view, the wilds of nature are inhabited by countless gods, demons, and spirits, who<br />

must all be brought under control: the lu — water spirits which cont<strong>am</strong>inate wells and divert rivers;<br />

the nyen — tree spirits that cause illnesses, especially cancer; the jepo — the harmful ghosts of bad<br />

kings and l<strong>am</strong>as who broke their vows; the black dü — open rebels who deliberately turn against the<br />

Dharma; the m<strong>am</strong>o, also black — a dangerous breed of witches and harpies; the sa — evil astral<br />

demons; and many others. <strong>The</strong>y all posed a daily threat for body and soul, life and possession in the<br />

Tibet of old and had to be kept in check through constant rituals and incantations. This animist world<br />

view is still alive and well today despite Chinese communist materialism and rationalism and is<br />

currently experiencing an outright renaissance.<br />

But it was not enough to have conquered and enchained (mostly via magic rituals) the nature spirits

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!