09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

up until the Enlightenment. Thus, when the Kundun says in 1996 in an interview that “my proposal<br />

treats Tibet as something like one human body. <strong>The</strong> whole Tibet is one body”, this is not just intended<br />

allegorically and geopolitically, but also tantrically (Sh<strong>am</strong>bhala Sun, archives, November, 1996).<br />

Strictly interpreted, the statement also means: Tibet and my energy body are identical with one<br />

another.<br />

Tibet on the other hand is a microcosmic likeness of the sum of humanity, at least that is how the<br />

Tibetan National Assembly sees the matter in a letter from the year 1946. We can read there that<br />

“there are many great nations on this earth who have achieved unprecedented wealth and might, but<br />

there is only one nation which is dedicated to the well-being of humanity and that is the religious land<br />

of Tibet, which cherishes a joint spiritual and temporal system” (Newsgroup 12).<br />

<strong>The</strong> mandala as the organizational form of the Tibetan state<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is something specific in the state structure of the historical Buddhocracy which distinguishes it<br />

from the purely pyr<strong>am</strong>idal constitution of Near Eastern theocracies. Alone because of the many<br />

schools and sub-schools of Tibetan Buddhism we cannot speak of a classic leadership pyr<strong>am</strong>id at the<br />

pinnacle of which the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a stands. In order to describe in general terms the Buddhocratic form<br />

of state, S. J. T<strong>am</strong>biah introduced a term which has in the meantime become widespread in the<br />

relevant literature. He calls it “galactic politics” or “mandala politics” (T<strong>am</strong>biah, 1976, pp. 112 ff.)<br />

What can be understood by this?<br />

As in a solar system, the chief monasteries of the Land of Snows orbit like planets around the highest<br />

incarnation of Tibet, the god-king and world ruler from Lhasa, and form with him a living mandala.<br />

This planetary principle is repeated in the organizational form of the chief monasteries, in the center<br />

of which a tulku likewise rules as a “little” Chakravartin. Here, each arch-abbot is the sun and father<br />

about whom rotate the so-called “child monasteries”, that is, the monastic communities subordinate to<br />

him. Under certain circumstances these can form a similar pattern with even smaller units.<br />

Mandala-pattern of the tibetan government (above)<br />

and the corresponding government offices around<br />

the Jokhang-Temple (below)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!