09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> sexual abuse of women in the modern Buddhist centers of the West has been made public by,<br />

<strong>am</strong>ong others, the American, Sandy Boucher. In many of these feminist critiques social arguments —<br />

one the one side an androcentric hierarchy, on the other the oppressed woman — are as frequent as<br />

theological and philosophical ones.<br />

<strong>The</strong> points which the neo-sh<strong>am</strong>an and Wicca Witch, Starhawk, brings against the Buddhist theory of<br />

suffering seem to us to be of such value that we would like quote them at length. Starhawk sees<br />

herself as a representative of the witch (Wicca) movement, as a feminist dakini: “Witchcraft does not<br />

maintain, like the First Truth of Buddhism, that 'all life is suffering'. On the contrary, life is a thing of<br />

wonder. <strong>The</strong> Buddha is said to have gained this insight [about suffering] after his encounter with old<br />

age, disease and wealth. In the Craft [i.e., the witch movement], old age is a natural and highly valued<br />

part of the cycle of life, the time of greatest wisdom and understanding. Disease, of course, causes<br />

misery but it is not something to be inevitably suffered: <strong>The</strong> practice of the Craft was always<br />

connected with the healing arts, with herbalism and midwifery. Nor is death fearful: It is simply the<br />

dissolution of the physical form that allows the spirit to prepare for new life. Suffering certainly exists<br />

in life — it is part of learning. But escape from the wheel of Birth and <strong>De</strong>ath is not the optimal cure,<br />

any more than hara-kiri is the best cure of menstrual cr<strong>am</strong>ps.” (quoted by Gross, 1993, p. 284).<br />

This radical feminist critique naturally also extends to Vajrayana: the cynical use of helpless girls in<br />

the sexual magic rituals and the exploitation of patriarchal positions of power by the tantric gurus<br />

stand at the center of the “patriarchal crimes”. But the alchemic transformation of feminine energy<br />

into a masculine one and the “tantric female sacrifice”, both of which we discussed so extensively in<br />

the first part of our study, are up until now not a point of contention. We shall soon see why.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> authors Tsultrim Allione, Janice Willis, Joana Macy, and Rita M. Gross can be counted <strong>am</strong>ong<br />

the third “reform party”. <strong>The</strong> latter of these believes it possible that a new world-encompassing vision<br />

can develop out of the encounter between feminism and Buddhism. She thus builds upon the critical<br />

work of the radical feminists, but her goal is a “post-patriarchal Buddhism”, that is, the<br />

institutionalization of the equality of the sexes within the Buddhist doctrine (Gross, 1993, p. 221).<br />

This reform should not be imposed upon the religious system from outside, but rather be carried<br />

through in “the heart of traditional Buddhism, its monasteries and educational institutions” (Gross,<br />

1993, p. 241). Rita Gross sees this linkage with women as a millennial project, which is supposed to<br />

continue the series of great stages in the history of Buddhism.<br />

For this reason she needs no lesser metaphor to describe her vision than the “turning of the wheel”, in<br />

remembrance of Buddha’s first sermon in Benares where, with the pronouncement of the Four Noble<br />

Truths, he set the “wheel of the teaching” in motion. If, as is usual in some Buddhist schools, one sees<br />

the first turning as the “lesser vehicle” (Hinayana), the second as the “great vehicle” (Mahayana), and<br />

the third as Tantrism (Tantrayana), then one could, like Gross, refer to the connection of Buddhism<br />

and feminism as the “fourth vehicle” or the fourth turning of the wheel. “And with each turning,” this<br />

author says, “we will discover a progressively richer and fuller basis for reconstructing androgynous<br />

[!] Buddhism” (Gross, 1993, p. 155). Many of the fund<strong>am</strong>ental Buddhist doctrines about emptiness,<br />

about the various energy bodies, about the ten-stage path to enlightenment, about emanation concepts<br />

would be retained, but could now also be followed and obeyed by women. But above all the author<br />

places weight on the ethical norms of Mahayana Buddhism and gives these a f<strong>am</strong>ily-oriented twist:<br />

compassion with all beings, thus also with women and children, the linking of f<strong>am</strong>ily structures with<br />

the Sangha (Buddhist community), the sacralization of the everyday, male assistance with the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!