09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Such sayings are reminiscent of the philosophy of life of a humorous Mahayana Buddhist, but not<br />

that of a Tantric. Whether the Kundun himself conducts are has conducted sexual magic practices is a<br />

secret which is for understandable reasons not betrayed. Only through incidental remarks — the taboo<br />

topic would never be spoken about in public otherwise — can it be gauged that the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a is<br />

completely informed about the consequences which proceed from the tantric rites.<br />

Thus, at an event in San Francisco (in 1994) His Holiness was discussing the topics of “sexuality and<br />

Buddhism” with students. When the talk c<strong>am</strong>e around to the “wise fool” Drungpa Kunley, who<br />

bec<strong>am</strong>e known through his erotic escapades, his huge male member, and through the Tibetan<br />

literature, the Kundun justified this figure’s wild sex life: in Drungpa we are dealing with a highly<br />

developed enlightened being, and his erotic activities — no matter how bizarre they may seem to an<br />

ordinary person — were always carried out for the benefit of all living beings. “He could”, the <strong>Dalai</strong><br />

L<strong>am</strong>a said with a smile, “enjoy excrement and urine just like fine foods and wine” and then he joked<br />

of the modern Tibetan l<strong>am</strong>as that, “If you put into their mouth some urine, they will not enjoy<br />

it” (Arianna, Newsgroup 3). From this it can be logically concluded that every enlightened one must<br />

pass the tantric “taste test” and that contemporary l<strong>am</strong>as are not prepared to undergo this test.<br />

At an academic seminar on dre<strong>am</strong> research in Dhar<strong>am</strong>sala the Kundun commented upon a paper with<br />

the following sentence: “Such work with dre<strong>am</strong>s by which it comes to ejaculation could be<br />

important” (<strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a XIV, 1996a, p. 115). Anyone who knows about the tantric seed gnosis also<br />

knows how fund<strong>am</strong>ental the god-king’s interest in this topic must be. At the s<strong>am</strong>e meeting he chatted<br />

about orgiastic encounters as if they were a constant part of his world of experiences. A comparison<br />

of the mystic clear lights with orgasm is also self-evident for him (<strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a XIV, 1996a, p. 116).<br />

Some years later, at the „Mind and Life” conference in Dhar<strong>am</strong>sala (in 1992), he spoke in great detail<br />

about tantric practices and even mentioned the offensive Vajroli method:”One training method that<br />

can be used as a standard of measurement of the level of one’s control entails inserting a straw into<br />

the genitals. In this practice the Yogi first drwas water, and later milk, upt to the straw. [Later again,<br />

we would add, the sukra from out of the vagina of his sexual partner] That cultivates the the ability to<br />

reverse the flow during intercourse (Varela, 1997, p. 172). With a somewhat insinuating smile the<br />

<strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a then explained the various typologies of the mudras to the western scholars who were<br />

attending: “In tantric literature, four typs of women, or consorts (Skt. mudra) are discussed. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

four types are lotus-like, deer-like, conch-shell-like, and the elephant-like.” He then joked that: “If<br />

the classification had originated in Tibet instead of India, they would have called it yak-like. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

distinctions all have primarily to do with the shape of the genitals, but they also refer to differences in<br />

terms of bodily constitution. <strong>The</strong>re are no such categories for men” (Varela, 1997, p. 173).<br />

Like all priests the Kundun’s attitude towards marriage is benevolent and paternalistic, without<br />

granting it any special spiritual significance. “At first glance married life appears full and attractive<br />

and that of the celibate as miserable. But I believe the life of a monk is more well balanced, there are<br />

less extremes, less highs and lows. I also always tell this to my young monks and nuns as<br />

consolation” (Zeitmagazin, no. 44, 22 October 1998, p. 24). It is nonetheless very important to him as<br />

reproduction for the maintenance of the Tibetan race and he is not at all happy when exiled Tibetans<br />

choose marriage partners of another race. He finds it likewise repulsive when ordained monks<br />

suddenly decide to marry. As his brother Lobsang S<strong>am</strong>ten told him of his marriage plans, the Kundun<br />

shouted at him in a reference to the Chinese repression, “Even a dog doesn't copulate while it's<br />

actually being beaten” (Craig,1997, p. 260). He later excused himself for this uncontrolled outburst.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!