09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

much demand for a sustained critical evaluation of religions.<br />

Yet anybody who reads closely the holy texts of the various schools of belief (be it the Koran,<br />

passages from the Old Test<strong>am</strong>ent, the Christian Book of Revelations, or the Kalachakra Tantra), is<br />

very soon confronted with an explosive potential for aggression, which must inevitably lead to bloody<br />

wars between cultures, and has always done so in the past. Fund<strong>am</strong>entalism is already present in the<br />

core of nearly all world religions and in no sense does it represent an essential misunderstanding of<br />

the true doctrine. [1]<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a is without doubt the most skilled and successful of all religious leaders in the<br />

infiltration of the West. He displays such an informed, tolerant, and apparently natural manner in<br />

public, that everybody is enchanted by him from first sight. It would not occur to anybody upon<br />

whom he turns his kindly Buddha smile that his religious system is intent upon forcibly subjecting the<br />

world to its law. But — as we wish to demonstrate in what follows — this is L<strong>am</strong>aism’s persistently<br />

pursued goal.<br />

Although understandable, this western naiveté and ignorance cannot be excused — not just because it<br />

has up until now neglected to thoroughly and critically investigate the history of Tibet and the religion<br />

of Tantric Buddhism, but because we have also completely forgotten that we had to free ourselves at<br />

great cost from an atavistic world. <strong>The</strong> despotism of the church, the inquisition, the deprivation of the<br />

right to decide, the elimination of the will, the contempt for the individual, the censorship, the<br />

persecution of those of other faiths — were all difficult obstacles to overcome in the development of<br />

modern western culture. <strong>The</strong> Occident ousted its old “gods” and myths during the Enlightenment;<br />

now it is re-importing them through the uncritical adoption of exotic religious systems. Since the<br />

West is firmly convinced that the separation of state and religion must be apparent to every reasonable<br />

person, it is unwilling and unable to comprehend the politico-religious processes of the imported<br />

atavistic cultures. Fascism, for ex<strong>am</strong>ple, was a classic case of the reactivation of ancient myths.<br />

Nearly all of the religious dogmata of Tantric Buddhism have also — with variations — cropped up<br />

in the European past and form a part of our western inheritance. For this reason it seems sensible,<br />

before we ex<strong>am</strong>ine the history of Tibet and the politics of the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a, to compare several maxims<br />

of L<strong>am</strong>aist political and historical thought with corresponding conceptions from the occidental<br />

tradition. This will, we hope, help the reader better understand the visions of the “living Buddha”.<br />

Myth and history<br />

For the Ancient Greeks of Homer’s time, history had no intrinsic value; it was experienced as the<br />

recollection of myth. <strong>The</strong> myths of the gods, and later those of the heroes, formed so to speak those<br />

original events which were re-enacted in thousands of variations by people here on earth, and this “reenactment”<br />

was known as history. History was thus no more and no less than the mortal imitation of<br />

divine myths. “When something should be decided <strong>am</strong>ong the humans,” — W. F. Otto has written of<br />

the ancient world view of the Hellenes — “the dispute must first take place between the<br />

gods” (quoted by Hübner, 1985, p. 131).<br />

If, however, historical events, such as the Trojan War for ex<strong>am</strong>ple, developed an inordinate<br />

significance, then the boundary between myth and history bec<strong>am</strong>e blurred. <strong>The</strong> historical incidents<br />

could now themselves become myths, or better the reverse, the myth seized hold of history so as to<br />

incorporate it and make it similar. For the ancient peoples, this “mythologizing” of history signified

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!