09.12.2012 Views

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

Kritik am Buch „The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama ... - Neues von Shi De

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Shadow</strong> of the <strong>Dalai</strong> L<strong>am</strong>a – Part I – 12. Epilogue to part I<br />

© Victor & Victoria Trimondi<br />

12. EPILOGUE TO PART I<br />

We have shown that Buddhism has from the very beginning considered the feminine principle to be a<br />

force which acts in opposition to its redemptive concepts. All types of women, from the mother to the<br />

lover, the wife, the hetaera, even the Buddhist nun, are seen to be more or less obstructions along the<br />

path to enlightenment. This negative evaluation of the feminine does not and never did have — as is<br />

often currently claimed — a social origin, but must rather be considered as a dogmatic and<br />

fund<strong>am</strong>ental doctrine of this religion. It is an unavoidable consequence of the opening sentence of the<br />

Four Noble Truths, which states that all life is, per se, suffering. From this we can conclude that each<br />

and every birth brings only misery, sickness, and death, or conversely, that only the cessation of<br />

reincarnation leads to liberation. <strong>The</strong> woman, as the place of conception and childbearing, opens the<br />

gateway to incarnation, and is thus considered to be the greatest adversary to the spiritual<br />

development of the man and of humanity in total.<br />

This implies that the deactivation, the sacrifice, and the destruction of the feminine principle is a<br />

central concern of Buddhism. <strong>The</strong> “female sacrifice” is already played out in one of the first legends<br />

from the life of Buddha, the early death of Buddha's mother Maya. Even her n<strong>am</strong>e evokes the Indian<br />

goddess of the feminine world of illusion; the death of Maya (illusion) simultaneously signifies the<br />

appearance of the absolute truth (Buddha), since Maya represents only relative truth.<br />

We have shown how Shaky<strong>am</strong>uni's fund<strong>am</strong>entally misogynist attitude was set forth in the ensuing<br />

phases of Buddhism — in the meditative dismemberment of the female during a spiritual exercise in<br />

Hinayana; in the attempt to change the sex of the woman so that she can gain entry to the higher<br />

spiritual spheres as a male in Mahayana.<br />

In Vajrayana the negative attitude towards the feminine tips over into an apparently positive<br />

valuation. Women, sexuality, and the erotic receive a previously unknown elevation in the tantric<br />

texts, a deification in fact. We have nonetheless been able to demonstrate that this reversal of the<br />

image of the woman is for the yogi merely a means to an end — to steal the feminine energy<br />

(gynergy) concentrated within her as a goddess. We have termed the sexual magic rituals through<br />

which this thieving transfer of energy is conducted the “tantric female sacrifice”, intended in its<br />

broadest sense and irrespective of whether the theft really or merely symbolically takes place, since<br />

the distinction between reality and the world of symbols is in the final instance irrelevant for a<br />

Tantric. All that is real is symbolic, and every symbol is real!<br />

<strong>The</strong> goal of the female sacrifice and the diversion of gynergy is the production of a superhuman<br />

androgynous being, which combines within itself both forces, the masculine and the feminine.<br />

Buddhist Tantrics consider such a combination of sexual energies within a single individual to be an<br />

expression of supreme power. He as a man has become a bearer of the maha mudra, the vessel of an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!