Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan
2iUWd5b
2iUWd5b
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
provided for another review procedure for the decisions of acequia commissioners by enacting<br />
Section 73–2–21(E).<br />
The Owners second assertion was that the deferential standard of review in Section 73-2-21(E)<br />
violated the equal protection clause of Article II, Section 18 of the New Mexico Constitution.<br />
The Owners argued that their equal protection guarantees were violated because water rights<br />
transfers out of acequias were treated differently than other water rights transfers. The court<br />
again disagreed, finding that although other determinations of water rights are afforded a de novo<br />
hearing in the district court, since the Owners still had access to the courts and the right of<br />
appeal, there were no equal protection violations.<br />
4.1.1.11 <strong>Water</strong> Conservation<br />
Guidelines for drafting and implementing water conservation plans are set forth in NMSA 1978,<br />
Section 72-14-3.2 (2003). By statute, neither the <strong>Water</strong> Trust Board nor the New Mexico<br />
Finance Authority may accept an application from a covered entity (defined as municipalities,<br />
counties, and any other entities that supply at least 500 acre-feet per annum of water to its<br />
customers, but excluding tribes and pueblos) for financial assistance to construct any water<br />
diversion, storage, conveyance, water treatment, or wastewater treatment facility unless the<br />
entity includes a copy of its water conservation plan.<br />
The water conservation statute primarily supplies guidance to covered entities, as opposed to<br />
mandating any particular action. For example, the statute provides that the covered entity<br />
determines the manner in which it will develop, adopt, and implement a water conservation plan.<br />
The statute further states that a covered entity “shall consider” either adopting ordinances or<br />
codes to encourage conservation, or otherwise “shall consider” incentives to encourage voluntary<br />
compliance with conservation guidelines. The statute then states that covered entities “shall<br />
consider, and incorporate in its plan if appropriate, . . . a variety of conservation measures,”<br />
including, in part, water-efficient fixtures and appliances, water reuse, leak repairs, and water<br />
rate structures encouraging efficiency and reuse. Section 72-14-3.2(D). Also, pursuant to NMSA<br />
1978, §§ 72-5-28(G) (2002) and 72-12-8(D) (2002), when water rights are placed in a State<br />
Engineer-approved water conservation program, periods of nonuse of the rights covered in the<br />
plan do not count toward the four-year forfeiture period.<br />
4.1.1.12 Municipal Condemnation<br />
NMSA 1978, Section 3-27-2 (2009) was amended in 2009 to prohibit municipalities from<br />
condemning water sources used by, water stored for use by, or water rights owned or served by<br />
an acequia, community ditch, irrigation district, conservancy district, or political subdivision of<br />
the state.<br />
<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2017 35