15.01.2017 Views

Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan

2iUWd5b

2iUWd5b

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

provided for another review procedure for the decisions of acequia commissioners by enacting<br />

Section 73–2–21(E).<br />

The Owners second assertion was that the deferential standard of review in Section 73-2-21(E)<br />

violated the equal protection clause of Article II, Section 18 of the New Mexico Constitution.<br />

The Owners argued that their equal protection guarantees were violated because water rights<br />

transfers out of acequias were treated differently than other water rights transfers. The court<br />

again disagreed, finding that although other determinations of water rights are afforded a de novo<br />

hearing in the district court, since the Owners still had access to the courts and the right of<br />

appeal, there were no equal protection violations.<br />

4.1.1.11 <strong>Water</strong> Conservation<br />

Guidelines for drafting and implementing water conservation plans are set forth in NMSA 1978,<br />

Section 72-14-3.2 (2003). By statute, neither the <strong>Water</strong> Trust Board nor the New Mexico<br />

Finance Authority may accept an application from a covered entity (defined as municipalities,<br />

counties, and any other entities that supply at least 500 acre-feet per annum of water to its<br />

customers, but excluding tribes and pueblos) for financial assistance to construct any water<br />

diversion, storage, conveyance, water treatment, or wastewater treatment facility unless the<br />

entity includes a copy of its water conservation plan.<br />

The water conservation statute primarily supplies guidance to covered entities, as opposed to<br />

mandating any particular action. For example, the statute provides that the covered entity<br />

determines the manner in which it will develop, adopt, and implement a water conservation plan.<br />

The statute further states that a covered entity “shall consider” either adopting ordinances or<br />

codes to encourage conservation, or otherwise “shall consider” incentives to encourage voluntary<br />

compliance with conservation guidelines. The statute then states that covered entities “shall<br />

consider, and incorporate in its plan if appropriate, . . . a variety of conservation measures,”<br />

including, in part, water-efficient fixtures and appliances, water reuse, leak repairs, and water<br />

rate structures encouraging efficiency and reuse. Section 72-14-3.2(D). Also, pursuant to NMSA<br />

1978, §§ 72-5-28(G) (2002) and 72-12-8(D) (2002), when water rights are placed in a State<br />

Engineer-approved water conservation program, periods of nonuse of the rights covered in the<br />

plan do not count toward the four-year forfeiture period.<br />

4.1.1.12 Municipal Condemnation<br />

NMSA 1978, Section 3-27-2 (2009) was amended in 2009 to prohibit municipalities from<br />

condemning water sources used by, water stored for use by, or water rights owned or served by<br />

an acequia, community ditch, irrigation district, conservancy district, or political subdivision of<br />

the state.<br />

<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2017 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!