15.01.2017 Views

Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan

2iUWd5b

2iUWd5b

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Two other significant domestic well decisions addressed domestic well use within municipalities.<br />

In Smith v. City of Santa Fe, 2007-NMSC-055, 142 N.M. 786, the Supreme Court examined the<br />

authority of the City of Santa Fe to enact an ordinance restricting the drilling of domestic wells.<br />

The Court held that under the City’s home rule powers, it had authority to prohibit the drilling of<br />

a domestic well within the municipal boundaries and that this authority was not preempted by<br />

existing state law.<br />

Then in Stennis v. City of Santa Fe, 2008-NMSC-008, 143 N.M. 320, Santa Fe’s domestic well<br />

ordinance was tested when a homeowner (Stennis) applied for a domestic well permit with the<br />

NMOSE, but did not apply for a permit from the City. In examining the statute allowing<br />

municipalities to restrict the drilling of domestic wells, the Court found that municipalities must<br />

strictly comply with NMSA 1978, Section 3–53–1.1(D) (2001), which requires cities to file their<br />

ordinances restricting the drilling of domestic water wells with the NMOSE. On remand, the<br />

Court of Appeals held that Section 3-53-1.1(D) does not allow for substantial compliance.<br />

Stennis v. City of Santa Fe, 2010-NMCA-108, 149 N.M. 92. Rather, strict compliance is<br />

required and the City must have actually filed a copy of the ordinance with the NMOSE.<br />

In addition to the cases addressing domestic wells, the regulations governing the use of<br />

groundwater for domestic use were substantially amended in 2006 to clarify domestic well use<br />

pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 72-12-1.1. 19.27.5.1 et seq. NMAC. The regulations:<br />

1. Limit the amount of water that can be used pursuant to a new domestic well permit to:<br />

• 1.0 acre feet per year (ac-ft/yr) for a single household use (can be increased to up to<br />

3.0 ac-ft/yr if the applicant can show that the combined diversion from domestic wells<br />

will not impair existing water rights).<br />

• 1.0 ac-ft/yr for each household served by a well serving more than one household, with a<br />

cap of 3.0 ac-ft/yr if the well serves three or more households.<br />

• 1.0 ac-ft/yr for drinking and sanitary purposes incidental to the operations of a<br />

governmental, commercial, or non-profit facility as long as no other water source is<br />

available. The amount of water so permitted is subject to further limitations imposed by<br />

a court or a municipal or county ordinance.<br />

The amount of water that can be diverted from a domestic well can also be increased by<br />

transferring an existing water right to the well. 19.27.5.9 NMAC.<br />

2. Require mandatory metering of all new domestic wells under certain conditions, such as<br />

when wells are permitted within a domestic well management area, when a court imposes a<br />

metering requirement, when the water use is incidental to the operations of a governmental,<br />

commercial, or non-profit facility, and when the well serves multiple households.<br />

19.27.5.13(C) NMAC.<br />

<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2017 32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!