Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Review of the 2004 Strategies Page 6 of 24 2004 Strategy Name R2-3— Funding Source for Water Activities (A-59, A-58) R2-4— Elephant Butte Loss Accounting (A-51) R2-5—Active Administration (A-143) 2015 rankings Complete a Progress b Priority c Strategy Description from Chapter 10.2 of 2004 Plan Y 2 5 In order to have a reliable funding source for water projects, planning and conservation, a dedicated and reliable recurring revenue stream augmented with federal funds needs to be established. The state is seen as the most appropriate level of authority to impose such a revenue source and to manage the proceeds for the benefit of the state and for the region. N 1 5 The Office of the State Engineer and Interstate Stream Commission (NMISC) should assure that evaporative losses from Elephant Butte Reservoir are apportioned fairly between the two water-planning regions, Socorro-Sierra and Middle Rio Grande. Spring 2004 information from the NMISC indicates that the compact has already apportioned the waters of the basin; evaporative losses are considered neither an asset nor a liability. Therefore, this does not seem to be a viable option. S 2 4 The plan encourages active administration by NMISC. The State Engineer should establish an improved enforcement program to ensure that only the necessary and allowable water is drawn for municipal uses, agriculture, and other uses. In addition, the region is increasing its draw upon water by transferring the rights from one point to another, and then continuing to consume water at the location from which the water rights were transferred. It is recommended that a program be instituted for enforcing water retirements after transfers (both permanent and temporary). It is particularly important that land whose water rights have been retired, transferred or leased not continue to use part or all wet water for which it had been previously entitled. 2015 Steering Committee Comments After the 2004 RWP, the Water Trust Board was created to take on such tasks, but the steering committee disagreed on how effective it has been. Consistent funding for RWP and implementation of projects has not been available. Although not in the MRG RWP region, the evaporative losses from Elephant Butte represent a significant percentage of the MRG Basin's water budget. RG Compact delivery obligations affect all users of the Rio Grande. As such, the proposals to reduce the amount of water lost to evaporation (including surfactants to reduce direct evaporation, move water storage to more northern reservoirs, and using ASR) should be pursued. This Recommendation preceded the NMOSE's Active Water Resource Administration. What's still lacking is an enforcement of water retirements after transfers and administrative rules for the MRG. a Y = Yes, N = No, S = started b Progress: 1 = Not effective, 5 = Very effective c Priority: 1 = Low priority; 5 = High priority Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017
Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Review of the 2004 Strategies Page 7 of 24 2004 Strategy Name R2-6—Water Resource Database (A-73) 2015 rankings Complete a Progress b Priority c Strategy Description from Chapter 10.2 of 2004 Plan Y 3 5 A regional water resource database needs to be established and maintained within the region and made accessible to all interested parties. This regional data and information can be available as a basis for historical trend analysis, current conditions profile, and future projections of water supply and demand. Currently, the data applicable to this region is maintained by a number of agencies and may not be suitable for centralized accumulation and storage. It is recommended that a regional compilation of data could be achieved through a cooperative networking process with a directory of source locations and other necessary references for retrieving the data. Technical studies calculating inflows, consumptive uses, and interaction between ground water and surface water in the region still contain uncertainties. While within reasonable ranges of each other, different studies yield somewhat different numbers. It is also recommended that further studies be conducted to enhance the credibility of the results and recommendations of this water plan, to help appraise the success in solving the region’s water problems, and to guide the region to improve remedial actions. (continued on next page) 2015 Steering Committee Comments While data has been gathered and modeled (URGWOM, Statewide Water Assessment, ABCWUA, AWARDS ET Toolbox, etc.), much of the data and models are in formats that prevent communication, are not generally available to each other or the public, or do not enable success in solving the region’s water problems. Links with spatial models, still lacking, would enable integrated planning. a Y = Yes, N = No, S = started b Progress: 1 = Not effective, 5 = Very effective c Priority: 1 = Low priority; 5 = High priority Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017
Page 1 and 2:
Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Executive Summary
Page 5 and 6:
List of Figures 1-1 Location of Mid
Page 7 and 8:
5-12 Leaking Underground Storage Ta
Page 9 and 10:
MCL MCLG MDWCA MRCOG MRGAA MRGCD MR
Page 11 and 12:
Executive Summary The Middle Rio Gr
Page 13 and 14:
Planning Method For this RWP, water
Page 15 and 16:
appropriations are available in the
Page 17 and 18:
channel aggradation. These changes
Page 19 and 20:
In 2014, the U.S. Environmental Pro
Page 21 and 22:
• Bosque and other riparian habit
Page 23 and 24:
1. Introduction The Middle Rio Gran
Page 25 and 26:
The organization of this update fol
Page 27 and 28:
2.1 The New Mexico Interstate Strea
Page 29 and 30:
2.2.1 Identification of Regional St
Page 31 and 32:
Table 2-1. Steering Committee Membe
Page 33 and 34:
Table 2-2. Middle Rio Grande Region
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Jicarilla Apache Nation Reservation
Page 41 and 42:
Sierra water planning region. Geogr
Page 43 and 44:
Table 3-1. Summary of Demographic a
Page 45 and 46:
4. Legal Issues 4.1 Relevant Water
Page 47 and 48:
In addition to Tri-State, several c
Page 49 and 50:
Socorro, Valencia, Bernalillo, Sand
Page 51 and 52:
Authority’s application sought to
Page 53 and 54:
equires the NMOSE to conduct hydrol
Page 55 and 56:
3. Allow for the declaration of dom
Page 57 and 58:
provided for another review procedu
Page 59 and 60:
Source: NMOSE, 2014a and 2014c La J
Page 61 and 62:
4.1.3 Federal Water Laws The law of
Page 63 and 64:
As discussed above, the three party
Page 65 and 66:
existing, and future uses). No adju
Page 67 and 68:
• Gather information on domestic
Page 69 and 70:
plan recognizes that water is easil
Page 71 and 72:
• Protect groundwater by preventi
Page 73 and 74:
not adequately consider all of the
Page 75 and 76:
4.2.2 Water Quality Laws 4.2.2.1 Fe
Page 77 and 78:
National Priorities List (NPL). 42
Page 79 and 80:
• The Jicarilla Apache Nation Cod
Page 81 and 82:
• Water users seeking to obtain w
Page 83 and 84:
• The Federal Emergency Managemen
Page 85 and 86:
water balance in the Middle Rio Gra
Page 87 and 88:
Table 5-1. Middle Rio Grande Climat
Page 89 and 90:
Sources: 1. WRCC, 2014 2. NWS, 2005
Page 91 and 92:
Jemez Springs Temperature (°F) 90
Page 93 and 94:
Jemez Springs Precipitation (inches
Page 95 and 96:
drought monitoring systems, and it
Page 97 and 98:
Climate Division 5 14 12 10 8 6 4 2
Page 99 and 100:
expected. To assess climate trends
Page 101 and 102:
Rio Chama La Jara JEMEZ RIVER NEAR
Page 103 and 104:
Table 5-4a. USGS Stream Gage Statio
Page 105 and 106:
Table 5-4a. USGS Stream Gage Statio
Page 107 and 108:
Table 5-4b. USGS Stream Gage Annual
Page 109 and 110:
Table 5-5. USGS Stream Gage Average
Page 111 and 112:
1,200,000 1,000,000 Jemez River nea
Page 113 and 114:
Rio Grande at Albuquerque, NM 2,000
Page 115 and 116:
Table 5-6. Reservoirs and Lakes (gr
Page 117 and 118:
Table 5-7. Dams with Dam Safety Def
Page 119 and 120:
Tsj Southern Rocky Mountain Colorad
Page 121 and 122:
In order to evaluate changes in wat
Page 123 and 124:
5,025 5,020 351852106344901 Aquifer
Page 125 and 126:
Source: NMED, 2014a and 2014c Note:
Page 127 and 128:
Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Table 5-9. Municipal and Industrial
Page 139 and 140:
Table 5-10. Groundwater Discharge P
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Table 5-11. Superfund Sites in the
Page 147 and 148:
Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Table 5-13. Landfills in the Middle
Page 163 and 164:
Runoff, flooding, and debris flows
Page 165 and 166:
• The minimum annual yield for ke
Page 167:
Table 6-1. Total Withdrawals in the
Page 170 and 171:
P:\_NM15-203\RWPs_2016\12_MRG\Figur
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
• Riparian evapotranspiration: So
Page 178 and 179:
The Arrowhead Center at NMSU analyz
Page 180 and 181:
• The continued presence of Sandi
Page 182 and 183:
to 669,727 acres. Also, during that
Page 184 and 185:
For this regional water plan update
Page 186 and 187:
Table 6-4. 2010 Water Withdrawals f
Page 188 and 189:
Table 6-4 2010 Water Withdrawals fo
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
• Consumptive use occurs when wat
Page 196 and 197:
estrictions (i.e., the water is phy
Page 198 and 199:
demand in this sector. The amount o
Page 200 and 201:
6.5.2 Middle Rio Grande Projected W
Page 202 and 203:
Table 6-5 Projected Water Demand, 2
Page 204 and 205:
Within Bernalillo County, the high
Page 206 and 207:
P:\_NM15-203\RWPs_2016\12_Middle Ri
Page 208 and 209:
• Priority for Continued Implemen
Page 210 and 211: When the 2004 RWP was developed the
Page 212 and 213: Table 8-2. Key Collaborative Progra
Page 214 and 215: Table 8-2. Key Collaborative Progra
Page 216 and 217: Bartolino, James R. and James C. Co
Page 218 and 219: Hawley, J.W. 1986. Physiographic pr
Page 220 and 221: The Middle Rio Grande-Albuquerque R
Page 222 and 223: New Mexico Environment Department (
Page 224 and 225: S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc.
Page 226 and 227: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2014
Page 228 and 229: Middle Rio Grande Region 12 RWP Mas
Page 230 and 231: Riley Middle Rio Grande Region 12 R
Page 232 and 233: Appendix 2-B Summary of Comments on
Page 234 and 235: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
Page 250 and 251: Appendix 6-A List of Individuals In
Page 252 and 253: Appendix 6-B Projected Population G
Page 254 and 255: Appendix 8-A Review of 2004 Strateg
Page 256 and 257: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
Page 280: Planning Region Middle Rio Grande M
Page 284: Regional Water Planning Update Proj
Page 288: Regional Water Planning Update Proj
Page 291: Regional Water Planning Update Infr
Page 295: Regional Water Planning Update Infr
Page 299: Planning Region Middle Rio Grande M
show all

Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?