Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan
2iUWd5b 2iUWd5b
Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Review of the 2004 Strategies Page 4 of 24 2004 Strategy Name 2015 rankings Complete a Progress b Priority c Water Resources Planning and Management R2-1— Adjudication and Water Rights Settlement (A-71) R2-2— Conjunctive Use Management (A-144) Strategy Description from Chapter 10.2 of 2004 Plan N 1 5 Identifying, quantifying and prioritizing water rights is paramount to better water management. Currently, the State Engineer uses the process of adjudication to accomplish this. It is recommended that this process be utilized in the region unless a more expedient, equitable, and less costly process is created. Alternative dispute resolution should be considered as an option. Furthermore, this plan recommends that the legislature appropriate and the State Engineer direct sufficient funds to prepare the necessary information, including hydrographic surveys, to identify, quantify and resolve priority ownership rights. N 3 5 Ground water and surface water are two parts of the same system in the Middle Rio Grande Region; each interacts with and markedly affects the other. For water resources in such a system to be managed effectively, they must be managed together, that is, “conjunctively.” New Mexico is presently unable to conjunctively manage its ground and surface waters effectively because of state laws that are mutually incompatible and that have led to overdrafts that greatly exceed sustainability. (continued on next page) 2015 Steering Committee Comments The Steering Committee agreed that adjudication was a high priority but that no action has been initiated on the MRG's section of the Rio Grande. The Albuquerque Bernalillo Water Users Authority (ABCWUA) has seen significant improvement in local groundwater conditions by reducing per capita water use and supplementing the groundwater supply with surface water supplies from the San Juan River, thus reducing pumping. On the operational side the ABCWUA has had great success with conjunctive management, but legislation on conjunctive management has yet to be achieved and is still needed. Conjunctive management is also a state plan recommendation. a Y = Yes, N = No, S = started b Progress: 1 = Not effective, 5 = Very effective c Priority: 1 = Low priority; 5 = High priority Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017
Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Review of the 2004 Strategies Page 5 of 24 2004 Strategy Name R2-2— Conjunctive Use Management (A-144) (cont.) 2015 rankings Complete a Progress b Priority c Strategy Description from Chapter 10.2 of 2004 Plan N 3 5 Some of the main impediments to good conjunctive-use management are: junior ground-water rights that intercept and draw the flow of ground water away from nearby rivers, thereby impairing older surface-water rights; uncontrolled domestic well development in some local high density areas; inability to strictly apply the priority system; and woefully inadequate requirements for metering and reporting water diversions. This plan recommends strengthening conjunctive-use management by encouraging the state legislature to define state water management aims and by directly addressing aspects of New Mexico water law that now prevent conjunctive management of our ground and surface waters. What is needed at the most fundamental level are four things. First, the state should decide the fate of the priority system — including whether and how it should be modified. Second, the state should decide how to make the management of ground water and surface-water rights mutually consistent, and consistent with how water-right priorities are to apply. Third, it should decide what transitional adjustments will be needed to phase in any changes in a fair and equitable manner from our present unbalanced system. Fourth, it should provide clear guidance to its water officers, especially the State Engineer, on the philosophy and principles that are to govern administration of this state’s water affairs. 2015 Steering Committee Comments a Y = Yes, N = No, S = started b Progress: 1 = Not effective, 5 = Very effective c Priority: 1 = Low priority; 5 = High priority Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017
- Page 208 and 209: • Priority for Continued Implemen
- Page 210 and 211: When the 2004 RWP was developed the
- Page 212 and 213: Table 8-2. Key Collaborative Progra
- Page 214 and 215: Table 8-2. Key Collaborative Progra
- Page 216 and 217: Bartolino, James R. and James C. Co
- Page 218 and 219: Hawley, J.W. 1986. Physiographic pr
- Page 220 and 221: The Middle Rio Grande-Albuquerque R
- Page 222 and 223: New Mexico Environment Department (
- Page 224 and 225: S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc.
- Page 226 and 227: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2014
- Page 228 and 229: Middle Rio Grande Region 12 RWP Mas
- Page 230 and 231: Riley Middle Rio Grande Region 12 R
- Page 232 and 233: Appendix 2-B Summary of Comments on
- Page 234 and 235: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 236 and 237: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 238 and 239: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 240 and 241: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 242 and 243: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 244 and 245: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 246 and 247: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 248 and 249: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 250 and 251: Appendix 6-A List of Individuals In
- Page 252 and 253: Appendix 6-B Projected Population G
- Page 254 and 255: Appendix 8-A Review of 2004 Strateg
- Page 256 and 257: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 260 and 261: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 262 and 263: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 264 and 265: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 266 and 267: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 268 and 269: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 270 and 271: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 272 and 273: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 274 and 275: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 276 and 277: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 278 and 279: Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
- Page 280: Planning Region Middle Rio Grande M
- Page 284: Regional Water Planning Update Proj
- Page 288: Regional Water Planning Update Proj
- Page 291: Regional Water Planning Update Infr
- Page 295: Regional Water Planning Update Infr
- Page 299: Planning Region Middle Rio Grande M
Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Review of the 2004 Strategies<br />
Page 4 of 24<br />
2004<br />
Strategy<br />
Name<br />
2015<br />
rankings<br />
Complete a<br />
Progress b<br />
Priority c<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Resources <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Management<br />
R2-1—<br />
Adjudication<br />
and <strong>Water</strong><br />
Rights<br />
Settlement<br />
(A-71)<br />
R2-2—<br />
Conjunctive<br />
Use<br />
Management<br />
(A-144)<br />
Strategy Description from Chapter 10.2 of 2004 <strong>Plan</strong><br />
N 1 5 Identifying, quantifying and prioritizing water rights is<br />
paramount to better water management. Currently, the State<br />
Engineer uses the process of adjudication to accomplish this. It<br />
is recommended that this process be utilized in the region<br />
unless a more expedient, equitable, and less costly process is<br />
created. Alternative dispute resolution should be considered as<br />
an option. Furthermore, this plan recommends that the<br />
legislature appropriate and the State Engineer direct sufficient<br />
funds to prepare the necessary information, including<br />
hydrographic surveys, to identify, quantify and resolve priority<br />
ownership rights.<br />
N 3 5 Ground water and surface water are two parts of the same<br />
system in the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> Region; each interacts with<br />
and markedly affects the other. For water resources in such a<br />
system to be managed effectively, they must be managed<br />
together, that is, “conjunctively.” New Mexico is presently<br />
unable to conjunctively manage its ground and surface waters<br />
effectively because of state laws that are mutually incompatible<br />
and that have led to overdrafts that greatly exceed<br />
sustainability. (continued on next page)<br />
2015 Steering Committee Comments<br />
The Steering Committee agreed that adjudication was a<br />
high priority but that no action has been initiated on the<br />
MRG's section of the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong>.<br />
The Albuquerque Bernalillo <strong>Water</strong> Users Authority<br />
(ABCWUA) has seen significant improvement in local<br />
groundwater conditions by reducing per capita water use<br />
and supplementing the groundwater supply with surface<br />
water supplies from the San Juan River, thus reducing<br />
pumping. On the operational side the ABCWUA has had<br />
great success with conjunctive management, but<br />
legislation on conjunctive management has yet to be<br />
achieved and is still needed. Conjunctive management is<br />
also a state plan recommendation.<br />
a Y = Yes, N = No, S = started<br />
b Progress: 1 = Not effective, 5 = Very effective<br />
c Priority: 1 = Low priority; 5 = High priority<br />
<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2017