15.01.2017 Views

Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan

2iUWd5b

2iUWd5b

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8. Implementation of Strategies to Meet Future <strong>Water</strong> Demand<br />

An objective of the regional water planning update process is to identify strategies that will help<br />

the region prepare to balance the gap between supply and demand and address other future water<br />

management challenges, including infrastructure needs, protection of existing resources and<br />

water quality, and the need to maximize limited resources through water conservation and reuse.<br />

The supply and demand gap developed for this plan is based on withdrawals of water as reported<br />

in the New Mexico <strong>Water</strong> Use by Categories 2010 report prepared by the New Mexico Office of<br />

the State Engineer (NMOSE). The 2004 RWP for the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> region identified over<br />

40 recommended strategies to address this gap. The steering committee evaluated these<br />

strategies by first discussing the progress made on these recommendations and then rating them<br />

on priority for continued implementation.<br />

This RWP is building on the 2004 RWP and is considering strategies that will enhance and<br />

update, rather than replace, the strategies identified in the accepted water plan. The status of<br />

strategies from the 2004 RWP is assessed in Section 8.1. Additional strategies recommended in<br />

this RWP update—including a comprehensive table of projects, programs, and policies, key<br />

collaborative projects, and recommendations for the state water plan—are discussed in<br />

Section 8.3<br />

8.1 Implementation of Strategies Identified in Previously Accepted <strong>Regional</strong><br />

<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>s<br />

An important focus of the RWP update process is to both identify strategies and facilitate their<br />

implementation. To help address the implementation of new strategies, a review of the<br />

implementation of previous strategies was first completed.<br />

The steering committee carefully reviewed the strategies from Chapter 10 of the 2004 <strong>Middle</strong><br />

<strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> RWP over several meetings in 2015. Surveys were distributed to steering committee<br />

members to gather information on new projects and programs developed since the 2004 RWP<br />

was published. Projects from current <strong>Water</strong> Trust Board and Infrastructure and Capital<br />

Improvement <strong>Plan</strong> (ICIP) databases were also compiled by NMISC consultants.<br />

The 2004 RWP also contains two subregional plans for the <strong>Rio</strong> Puerco and <strong>Rio</strong> Jemez areas.<br />

The steering committee did not specifically evaluate the strategies described in these sub-region<br />

plans due to lack of representation from these areas on the committee.<br />

Each of the 41 strategies was ranked on several criteria:<br />

• Completeness: Y= Yes, complete; N=No, not started; S = Started, or partial achievement<br />

• Progress/Effectiveness: 1 = Little to no progress and not effective 5 = Well<br />

implemented and very effective<br />

<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2017 184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!