Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan
2iUWd5b 2iUWd5b
Within Bernalillo County, the high scenario for the industrial category is predicated on adding 25 percent of 2010 usage during each decade, while the low is based on adding 5 percent of 2010 usage each decade. In Valencia County, the high scenario assumes an additional 15 percent of 2010 usage during each decade, while the low assumes an additional 5 percent of 2010 usage in each decade. The projections for the power plant sector are based on input received from PNM, based on their proposed Integrated Resource Plan, which is currently under review by the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission. That plan calls for the continued operation of the Reeves gas unit in Bernalillo County (which currently uses 466 acre-feet of water, of which 250 acre-feet serves the plant and the balance serves agriculture). Water usage by the plant is projected to increase to 516 acre-feet by 2020 under the low scenario and to 556 acre-feet under the high. It is also assumed that a new plant will be built in Bernalillo County by 2020 and will use an increasing amount of water over time, reaching 250 acre-feet by 2060 under the low scenario and 280 acrefeet under the high. Finally, it is assumed that the La Luz gas plant in Valencia County will be operational by 2020 and will use 50 acre-feet per year under the low scenario and 55 under the high. For the mining sector, no change in water usage is projected through 2060. Most of the mines are relatively small, with the largest being the American Gypsum operation in Valencia County. The Middle Rio Grande region projections include water use in the reservoir evaporation category from Cochiti and Jemez Canyon reservoirs. Cochiti is primarily a flood control reservoir that has little impact on water supply in the region. As discussed in Section 6.5.1, the projected demand is based on 2010 reservoir surface areas so that it can accurately be compared to the 2010 administrative water supply, with the high projection reflecting increased temperatures and evaporation rates. The reservoir evaporation category is included for statewide accounting, but has little bearing on the supply available to the region. 7. Identified Gaps between Supply and Demand Estimating the balance between supply and demand requires consideration of several complex issues, including: • Because of the nature of the Rio Grande Compact, the supply available to the Middle Rio Grande region is inextricably linked to that of the Jemez y Sangre and Socorro-Sierra regions. Issues that affect those regions could affect the Middle Rio Grande and viceversa. • Both supplies and demands vary considerably over time, and although long-term balanced supplies may be in place, the potential for drought or, conversely, high flows and flooding must be considered. In general, storage, including the capture of extreme flows for future use, is an important aspect of allowing surface water supplies to be used Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017 181
when needed to meet demand during drought periods (i.e., reservoir releases may sustain supplies during times when surface water supplies are inadequate). • In wet years when more water is available than in 2010, irrigators can increase surface water diversions up to their water right and reservoirs will fill when inflow exceeds downstream demand, provided that compact requirements are satisfied, to increase storage for subsequent years. Thus, though not quantified, the withdrawals in wet years may be greater than the high projection. • Supplies in one part of the region may not necessarily be available to meet demands in other areas, particularly in the absence of expensive infrastructure projects. Therefore comparing the supplies to the demands for the entire region without considering local issues provides only a general picture of the balance. • As discussed in Section 6.5.1, the fluctuations in reservoir evaporation are expected to be greater than the projected high/low range developed for this balance. When comparing the projected demands to the administrative water supply, which is based on 2010 water withdrawals, 2010 surface areas of reservoirs were used to avoid an unrealistic scenario of excess available water. The actual amount of water that will be used for reservoir evaporation is dependent on the surface area of the reservoir and temperatures. • As discussed in Section 4, there are considerable legal limitations on the development of new surface and groundwater resources, given that surface and surface-connected groundwater supplies are fully appropriated, which affects the ability of the region to prepare for shortages by developing new supplies. • Besides quantitative estimates of supply and demand, numerous other challenges affect the ability of a region to have adequate water supplies in place. Water supply challenges include the need for adequate funding and resources for infrastructure projects, water quality issues, location and access to water resources, limited productivity of certain aquifers, protection of source water, and limitations inherent to water rights administration. Despite these limitations, it is useful to have a general understanding of the overall balance of the supply and demand. Figure 7-1 illustrates the total projected regional water demand under the high and low demand scenarios, and also shows the administrative water supply and the droughtadjusted water supply. As presented in Section 5.5, the region’s administrative water supply is 431,640 acre-feet and the drought supply is 228,955 acre-feet, or about 53 percent of a normal year administrative water supply. Future water demand projections reflect moderate growth under the low projection and higher growth in high projection (Figure 7-1). Even without the projected growth in demand, major supply shortages are indicated in drought years. Because of its reliance on surface water, the region has a very high degree of vulnerability to drought, and the estimated annual shortage in drought years is expected to range from 207,357 to 282,108 acre-feet. Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017 182
- Page 153 and 154: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 155 and 156: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 157 and 158: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 159 and 160: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 161 and 162: Table 5-13. Landfills in the Middle
- Page 163 and 164: Runoff, flooding, and debris flows
- Page 165 and 166: • The minimum annual yield for ke
- Page 167: Table 6-1. Total Withdrawals in the
- Page 170 and 171: P:\_NM15-203\RWPs_2016\12_MRG\Figur
- Page 172 and 173: P:\_NM15-203\RWPs_2016\12_MRG\Figur
- Page 174 and 175: P:\_NM15-203\RWPs_2016\12_MRG\Figur
- Page 176 and 177: • Riparian evapotranspiration: So
- Page 178 and 179: The Arrowhead Center at NMSU analyz
- Page 180 and 181: • The continued presence of Sandi
- Page 182 and 183: to 669,727 acres. Also, during that
- Page 184 and 185: For this regional water plan update
- Page 186 and 187: Table 6-4. 2010 Water Withdrawals f
- Page 188 and 189: Table 6-4 2010 Water Withdrawals fo
- Page 190 and 191: Table 6-4 2010 Water Withdrawals fo
- Page 192 and 193: Table 6-4 2010 Water Withdrawals fo
- Page 194 and 195: • Consumptive use occurs when wat
- Page 196 and 197: estrictions (i.e., the water is phy
- Page 198 and 199: demand in this sector. The amount o
- Page 200 and 201: 6.5.2 Middle Rio Grande Projected W
- Page 202 and 203: Table 6-5 Projected Water Demand, 2
- Page 206 and 207: P:\_NM15-203\RWPs_2016\12_Middle Ri
- Page 208 and 209: • Priority for Continued Implemen
- Page 210 and 211: When the 2004 RWP was developed the
- Page 212 and 213: Table 8-2. Key Collaborative Progra
- Page 214 and 215: Table 8-2. Key Collaborative Progra
- Page 216 and 217: Bartolino, James R. and James C. Co
- Page 218 and 219: Hawley, J.W. 1986. Physiographic pr
- Page 220 and 221: The Middle Rio Grande-Albuquerque R
- Page 222 and 223: New Mexico Environment Department (
- Page 224 and 225: S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc.
- Page 226 and 227: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2014
- Page 228 and 229: Middle Rio Grande Region 12 RWP Mas
- Page 230 and 231: Riley Middle Rio Grande Region 12 R
- Page 232 and 233: Appendix 2-B Summary of Comments on
- Page 234 and 235: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 236 and 237: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 238 and 239: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 240 and 241: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 242 and 243: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 244 and 245: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 246 and 247: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 248 and 249: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
- Page 250 and 251: Appendix 6-A List of Individuals In
- Page 252 and 253: Appendix 6-B Projected Population G
when needed to meet demand during drought periods (i.e., reservoir releases may sustain<br />
supplies during times when surface water supplies are inadequate).<br />
• In wet years when more water is available than in 2010, irrigators can increase surface<br />
water diversions up to their water right and reservoirs will fill when inflow exceeds<br />
downstream demand, provided that compact requirements are satisfied, to increase<br />
storage for subsequent years. Thus, though not quantified, the withdrawals in wet years<br />
may be greater than the high projection.<br />
• Supplies in one part of the region may not necessarily be available to meet demands in<br />
other areas, particularly in the absence of expensive infrastructure projects. Therefore<br />
comparing the supplies to the demands for the entire region without considering local<br />
issues provides only a general picture of the balance.<br />
• As discussed in Section 6.5.1, the fluctuations in reservoir evaporation are expected to be<br />
greater than the projected high/low range developed for this balance. When comparing<br />
the projected demands to the administrative water supply, which is based on 2010 water<br />
withdrawals, 2010 surface areas of reservoirs were used to avoid an unrealistic scenario<br />
of excess available water. The actual amount of water that will be used for reservoir<br />
evaporation is dependent on the surface area of the reservoir and temperatures.<br />
• As discussed in Section 4, there are considerable legal limitations on the development of<br />
new surface and groundwater resources, given that surface and surface-connected<br />
groundwater supplies are fully appropriated, which affects the ability of the region to<br />
prepare for shortages by developing new supplies.<br />
• Besides quantitative estimates of supply and demand, numerous other challenges affect<br />
the ability of a region to have adequate water supplies in place. <strong>Water</strong> supply challenges<br />
include the need for adequate funding and resources for infrastructure projects, water<br />
quality issues, location and access to water resources, limited productivity of certain<br />
aquifers, protection of source water, and limitations inherent to water rights<br />
administration.<br />
Despite these limitations, it is useful to have a general understanding of the overall balance of the<br />
supply and demand. Figure 7-1 illustrates the total projected regional water demand under the<br />
high and low demand scenarios, and also shows the administrative water supply and the droughtadjusted<br />
water supply. As presented in Section 5.5, the region’s administrative water supply is<br />
431,640 acre-feet and the drought supply is 228,955 acre-feet, or about 53 percent of a normal<br />
year administrative water supply. Future water demand projections reflect moderate growth<br />
under the low projection and higher growth in high projection (Figure 7-1). Even without the<br />
projected growth in demand, major supply shortages are indicated in drought years. Because of<br />
its reliance on surface water, the region has a very high degree of vulnerability to drought, and<br />
the estimated annual shortage in drought years is expected to range from 207,357 to<br />
282,108 acre-feet.<br />
<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2017 182