Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan

Recommendations

Info

Table 6-4 2010 Water Withdrawals for Drinking Water Supply Systems and Rural Self-Supplied Homes Page 7 of 7 OSE Declared Groundwater Basin(s) a Water Supplier b Population Valencia County (cont.) Per Capita Use (gpcd) Withdrawals (acre-feet) Surface Water Groundwater Rio Grande (Middle) Rural self-supplied homes (Rio Grande) 32,910 100 0 3,686 Valencia County domestic self-supplied totals 32,910 0 3,686 County-wide domestic self-supplied per capita use 100 Torrance County Rio Grande (Middle) Rural self-supplied homes (Rio Grande) 3 80 0 0 Valencia County domestic self-supplied totals 3 0 0 County-wide domestic self-supplied per capita use 80 Source: Longworth et al., 2013, unless otherwise noted. a Determined based on NMED Drinking Water Bureau water supply source locations (NMOSE water use database doesn't distinguish groundwater basin). b For systems supplied by surface water withdrawals, the surface water basin is provided in parentheses. c Groundwater basin assumed based on geographical location of water supplier gpcd = Gallons per capita per day NA = Information not available Source: Longworth et al., 2013, unless otherwise noted. Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017 a Determined based on NMED Drinking Water Bureau water supply source locations (NMOSE water use database doesn't distinguish groundwater basin). b For systems supplied by surface water withdrawals, the surface water basin is provided in parentheses. c Groundwater basin assumed based on geographical location of water supplier 169 gpcd = Gallons per capita per day NA = Information not available DRAFT
The system-wide per capita usage for each water supplier includes uses such as golf courses, parks, and commercial enterprises that are supplied by the system. Hence there can be large variability among the systems. For purposes of developing projections, a county-wide per capita rate was calculated as the total public supply use in the county divided by the total county population (or portion of the county within the region), excluding those served by domestic wells. For future projections (Section 6.5), a consistent method is being used statewide that assumes that conservation would reduce future per capita use in each county by the following amounts: • For current average per capita use greater than 300 gpcd, assume a reduction in future per capita use to 180 gpcd. • For current average per capita use between 200 and 300 gpcd, assume a reduction in future per capita use to 150 gpcd. • For current average per capita use between 130 and 200 gpcd, assume a reduction in future per capita use to 130 gpcd. • For current average per capita use less than 130 gpcd, no reduction in future per capita use is assumed. For the Middle Rio Grande region, Sandoval, Bernalillo, and Valencia counties currently have per capita use between 130 and 200 gpcd (141, 155, and 134 gpcd respectively [Table 6-4]), so their future per capita use is assumed to be reduced to 130 gpcd. In the projections, these reductions are phased in over time. Self-supplied domestic. Homeowners with private wells can achieve water savings through household conservation measures. These wells are not metered, and current water use estimates were developed based on a relatively low per capita use assumption (Table 6-4; Longworth et al., 2013). Therefore, no additional conservation savings were assumed in developing the water demand projections. For purposes of developing projections, a county-wide per capita rate was calculated as the total self-supplied domestic use in the county divided by the total county population (or portion of the county within the region), excluding those served by a public water system. Irrigated agriculture. As the largest water use in the region, conservation in this sector may be beneficial. However, when considering the potential for improved efficiency in agricultural irrigation systems, it is important to consider how potential conservation measures may affect the region's water supply. Withdrawals in both surface and groundwater irrigation systems include both consumptive and non-consumptive uses and incidental losses: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017 170
Page 1 and 2:
Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Executive Summary
Page 5 and 6:
List of Figures 1-1 Location of Mid
Page 7 and 8:
5-12 Leaking Underground Storage Ta
Page 9 and 10:
MCL MCLG MDWCA MRCOG MRGAA MRGCD MR
Page 11 and 12:
Executive Summary The Middle Rio Gr
Page 13 and 14:
Planning Method For this RWP, water
Page 15 and 16:
appropriations are available in the
Page 17 and 18:
channel aggradation. These changes
Page 19 and 20:
In 2014, the U.S. Environmental Pro
Page 21 and 22:
• Bosque and other riparian habit
Page 23 and 24:
1. Introduction The Middle Rio Gran
Page 25 and 26:
The organization of this update fol
Page 27 and 28:
2.1 The New Mexico Interstate Strea
Page 29 and 30:
2.2.1 Identification of Regional St
Page 31 and 32:
Table 2-1. Steering Committee Membe
Page 33 and 34:
Table 2-2. Middle Rio Grande Region
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Jicarilla Apache Nation Reservation
Page 41 and 42:
Sierra water planning region. Geogr
Page 43 and 44:
Table 3-1. Summary of Demographic a
Page 45 and 46:
4. Legal Issues 4.1 Relevant Water
Page 47 and 48:
In addition to Tri-State, several c
Page 49 and 50:
Socorro, Valencia, Bernalillo, Sand
Page 51 and 52:
Authority’s application sought to
Page 53 and 54:
equires the NMOSE to conduct hydrol
Page 55 and 56:
3. Allow for the declaration of dom
Page 57 and 58:
provided for another review procedu
Page 59 and 60:
Source: NMOSE, 2014a and 2014c La J
Page 61 and 62:
4.1.3 Federal Water Laws The law of
Page 63 and 64:
As discussed above, the three party
Page 65 and 66:
existing, and future uses). No adju
Page 67 and 68:
• Gather information on domestic
Page 69 and 70:
plan recognizes that water is easil
Page 71 and 72:
• Protect groundwater by preventi
Page 73 and 74:
not adequately consider all of the
Page 75 and 76:
4.2.2 Water Quality Laws 4.2.2.1 Fe
Page 77 and 78:
National Priorities List (NPL). 42
Page 79 and 80:
• The Jicarilla Apache Nation Cod
Page 81 and 82:
• Water users seeking to obtain w
Page 83 and 84:
• The Federal Emergency Managemen
Page 85 and 86:
water balance in the Middle Rio Gra
Page 87 and 88:
Table 5-1. Middle Rio Grande Climat
Page 89 and 90:
Sources: 1. WRCC, 2014 2. NWS, 2005
Page 91 and 92:
Jemez Springs Temperature (°F) 90
Page 93 and 94:
Jemez Springs Precipitation (inches
Page 95 and 96:
drought monitoring systems, and it
Page 97 and 98:
Climate Division 5 14 12 10 8 6 4 2
Page 99 and 100:
expected. To assess climate trends
Page 101 and 102:
Rio Chama La Jara JEMEZ RIVER NEAR
Page 103 and 104:
Table 5-4a. USGS Stream Gage Statio
Page 105 and 106:
Table 5-4a. USGS Stream Gage Statio
Page 107 and 108:
Table 5-4b. USGS Stream Gage Annual
Page 109 and 110:
Table 5-5. USGS Stream Gage Average
Page 111 and 112:
1,200,000 1,000,000 Jemez River nea
Page 113 and 114:
Rio Grande at Albuquerque, NM 2,000
Page 115 and 116:
Table 5-6. Reservoirs and Lakes (gr
Page 117 and 118:
Table 5-7. Dams with Dam Safety Def
Page 119 and 120:
Tsj Southern Rocky Mountain Colorad
Page 121 and 122:
In order to evaluate changes in wat
Page 123 and 124:
5,025 5,020 351852106344901 Aquifer
Page 125 and 126:
Source: NMED, 2014a and 2014c Note:
Page 127 and 128:
Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Table 5-9. Municipal and Industrial
Page 139 and 140:
Table 5-10. Groundwater Discharge P
Page 141 and 142: Table 5-10. Groundwater Discharge P
Page 143 and 144: Table 5-10. Groundwater Discharge P
Page 145 and 146: Table 5-11. Superfund Sites in the
Page 147 and 148: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
Page 161 and 162: Table 5-13. Landfills in the Middle
Page 163 and 164: Runoff, flooding, and debris flows
Page 165 and 166: • The minimum annual yield for ke
Page 167: Table 6-1. Total Withdrawals in the
Page 170 and 171: P:\_NM15-203\RWPs_2016\12_MRG\Figur
Page 176 and 177: • Riparian evapotranspiration: So
Page 178 and 179: The Arrowhead Center at NMSU analyz
Page 180 and 181: • The continued presence of Sandi
Page 182 and 183: to 669,727 acres. Also, during that
Page 184 and 185: For this regional water plan update
Page 186 and 187: Table 6-4. 2010 Water Withdrawals f
Page 188 and 189: Table 6-4 2010 Water Withdrawals fo
Page 190 and 191: Table 6-4 2010 Water Withdrawals fo
Page 194 and 195: • Consumptive use occurs when wat
Page 196 and 197: estrictions (i.e., the water is phy
Page 198 and 199: demand in this sector. The amount o
Page 200 and 201: 6.5.2 Middle Rio Grande Projected W
Page 202 and 203: Table 6-5 Projected Water Demand, 2
Page 204 and 205: Within Bernalillo County, the high
Page 206 and 207: P:\_NM15-203\RWPs_2016\12_Middle Ri
Page 208 and 209: • Priority for Continued Implemen
Page 210 and 211: When the 2004 RWP was developed the
Page 212 and 213: Table 8-2. Key Collaborative Progra
Page 214 and 215: Table 8-2. Key Collaborative Progra
Page 216 and 217: Bartolino, James R. and James C. Co
Page 218 and 219: Hawley, J.W. 1986. Physiographic pr
Page 220 and 221: The Middle Rio Grande-Albuquerque R
Page 222 and 223: New Mexico Environment Department (
Page 224 and 225: S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc.
Page 226 and 227: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2014
Page 228 and 229: Middle Rio Grande Region 12 RWP Mas
Page 230 and 231: Riley Middle Rio Grande Region 12 R
Page 232 and 233: Appendix 2-B Summary of Comments on
Page 234 and 235: Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Appendix 6-A List of Individuals In
Page 252 and 253:
Appendix 6-B Projected Population G
Page 254 and 255:
Appendix 8-A Review of 2004 Strateg
Page 256 and 257:
Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280:
Planning Region Middle Rio Grande M
Page 284:
Regional Water Planning Update Proj
Page 288:
Regional Water Planning Update Proj
Page 291:
Regional Water Planning Update Infr
Page 295:
Regional Water Planning Update Infr
Page 299:
Planning Region Middle Rio Grande M
show all

Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?