Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan

Recommendations

Info

Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load Status of Streams in the Middle Rio Grande Water Planning Region Page 9 of 10 Waterbody Name a (basin, segment) Assessment Unit ID Affected Reach (miles b ) Probable Sources of Pollutant Uses Not Fully Supported c Specific Pollutant IR Category d Valencia County Rio Grande (Rio Puerco to Isleta Pueblo bnd) NM-2105_40 35.97 Municipal point source discharges Waterfowl On-site treatment systems (septic) Source unknown Wastes from pets Municipal (high density area) Impervious surface/parking lot runoff MWWAL PC Escherichia coli Temperature, water 5/5A Rio Puerco (non-pueblo Rio Grande to Arroyo Chico) NM-2105_20 106.58 Source unknown PC WH Escherichia coli Mercury 5/5C Source: NMED, 2014a a Only waterbodies assigned to IR c ColdWAL = Coldwater aquatic life d Impairment (IR) category definitions are — = No information provided categories 3 and above are included. DWS = Domestic water supply attached as the last page of this table. (reach was not assessed). b Unless otherwise noted. HQColdWAL = High quality coldwater aquatic life e Acres IRR LAL LW MCWAL MWWAL PC WH WWAL = Irrigation = Limited aquatic life = Livestock watering = Marginal coldwater aquatic life = Marginal warmwater aquatic life = Primary contact = Wildlife habitat = Warm water aquatic life Source: NMED, 2014a a Only waterbodies assigned to IR c Explanation of uses abbreviations provided at d Impairment (IR) category definitions are — = No information provided categories 3 and above are included. the end of this table attached as the last page of this table. (reach was not assessed). b Unless otherwise noted. e Acres Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017 112 DRAFT
Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load Status of Streams in the Middle Rio Grande Water Planning Region Page 10 of 10 d Impairment (IR) categories are determined for each assessment unit (AU) by combining individual designated use support decisions. The applicable unique assessment categories for New Mexico (NMED, 2013) are described as follows: Category 3: No reliable monitored data and/or information to determine if any designated or existing use is attained. AUs are listed in this category where data to support an attainment determination for any use are not available, consistent with requirements of the assessment and listing methodology. Category 5A: Impaired for one or more designated or existing uses and a TMDL is underway or scheduled. AUs are listed in this category if the AU is impaired for one or more designated uses by a pollutant. Where more than one pollutant is associated with the impairment of a single AU the AU remains in Category 5A until TMDLs for all pollutants have been completed and approved by U.S. EPA. Category 3A: Limited data (n = 0 to 1) available, no exceedences. AUs are listed in this subcategory when there are no exceedences in the limited data set. These are considered low priority for follow up monitoring (NMED, 2013). Category 3B: Limited data (n = 1) available, exceedence. AUs are listed in this subcategory when there is an exceedence in the limited data set. These are considered high priority for follow up monitoring (NMED, 2013). Category 4A: Impaired for one or more designated uses, but does not require development of a TMDL because TMDL has been completed. AUs are listed in this subcategory once all TMDL(s) have been developed and approved by USEPA that, when implemented, are expected to result in full attainment of the standard. Where more than one pollutant is associated with the impairment of an AU, the AU remains in IR Category 5A (see below) until all TMDLs for each pollutant have been completed and approved by USEPA. Category 4C: Impaired for one or more designated uses but does not require development of a TMDL because impairment is not caused by a pollutant. AUs are listed in this subcategory if a pollutant does not cause the impairment. For example the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers flow alteration to be “pollution” vs. a “pollutant.” Category 5B: Impaired for one or more designated or existing uses and a review of the water quality standard will be conducted. AUs are listed in this category when it is possible that water quality standards are not being met because one or more current designated uses are inappropriate. After a review of the water quality standard is conducted a use attainability analysis (UAA) will be developed and submitted to U.S. EPA for consideration or the AU will be moved to Category 5A and a TMDL will be scheduled. Category 5C: Impaired for one or more designated or existing uses and additional data will be collected before a TMDL is scheduled. AUs are listed in this category if there are not enough data to determine the pollutant of concern or there are not adequate data to develop a TMDL. For example AUs with biological impairment will be listed in this category until further research can determine the particular pollutant(s) of concern. When the pollutant(s) are determined the AU will be moved to Category 5A and a TMDL will be scheduled. If it is determined that the current designated uses are inappropriate it will be moved to Category 5B and a UAA will be developed. If it is determined that “pollution” is causing the impairment (vs. a “pollutant”) the AU will be moved to Category 4C. Source: NMED, 2014a a Only waterbodies assigned to IR c Explanation of uses abbreviations provided at d Impairment (IR) category definitions are — = No information provided categories 3 and above are included. the end of this table attached as the last page of this table. (reach was not assessed). b Unless otherwise noted. e Acres Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017 113 DRAFT
Page 1 and 2:
Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Pl
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Executive Summary
Page 5 and 6:
List of Figures 1-1 Location of Mid
Page 7 and 8:
5-12 Leaking Underground Storage Ta
Page 9 and 10:
MCL MCLG MDWCA MRCOG MRGAA MRGCD MR
Page 11 and 12:
Executive Summary The Middle Rio Gr
Page 13 and 14:
Planning Method For this RWP, water
Page 15 and 16:
appropriations are available in the
Page 17 and 18:
channel aggradation. These changes
Page 19 and 20:
In 2014, the U.S. Environmental Pro
Page 21 and 22:
• Bosque and other riparian habit
Page 23 and 24:
1. Introduction The Middle Rio Gran
Page 25 and 26:
The organization of this update fol
Page 27 and 28:
2.1 The New Mexico Interstate Strea
Page 29 and 30:
2.2.1 Identification of Regional St
Page 31 and 32:
Table 2-1. Steering Committee Membe
Page 33 and 34:
Table 2-2. Middle Rio Grande Region
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Jicarilla Apache Nation Reservation
Page 41 and 42:
Sierra water planning region. Geogr
Page 43 and 44:
Table 3-1. Summary of Demographic a
Page 45 and 46:
4. Legal Issues 4.1 Relevant Water
Page 47 and 48:
In addition to Tri-State, several c
Page 49 and 50:
Socorro, Valencia, Bernalillo, Sand
Page 51 and 52:
Authority’s application sought to
Page 53 and 54:
equires the NMOSE to conduct hydrol
Page 55 and 56:
3. Allow for the declaration of dom
Page 57 and 58:
provided for another review procedu
Page 59 and 60:
Source: NMOSE, 2014a and 2014c La J
Page 61 and 62:
4.1.3 Federal Water Laws The law of
Page 63 and 64:
As discussed above, the three party
Page 65 and 66:
existing, and future uses). No adju
Page 67 and 68:
• Gather information on domestic
Page 69 and 70:
plan recognizes that water is easil
Page 71 and 72:
• Protect groundwater by preventi
Page 73 and 74:
not adequately consider all of the
Page 75 and 76:
4.2.2 Water Quality Laws 4.2.2.1 Fe
Page 77 and 78:
National Priorities List (NPL). 42
Page 79 and 80:
• The Jicarilla Apache Nation Cod
Page 81 and 82:
• Water users seeking to obtain w
Page 83 and 84: • The Federal Emergency Managemen
Page 85 and 86: water balance in the Middle Rio Gra
Page 87 and 88: Table 5-1. Middle Rio Grande Climat
Page 89 and 90: Sources: 1. WRCC, 2014 2. NWS, 2005
Page 91 and 92: Jemez Springs Temperature (°F) 90
Page 93 and 94: Jemez Springs Precipitation (inches
Page 95 and 96: drought monitoring systems, and it
Page 97 and 98: Climate Division 5 14 12 10 8 6 4 2
Page 99 and 100: expected. To assess climate trends
Page 101 and 102: Rio Chama La Jara JEMEZ RIVER NEAR
Page 103 and 104: Table 5-4a. USGS Stream Gage Statio
Page 105 and 106: Table 5-4a. USGS Stream Gage Statio
Page 107 and 108: Table 5-4b. USGS Stream Gage Annual
Page 109 and 110: Table 5-5. USGS Stream Gage Average
Page 111 and 112: 1,200,000 1,000,000 Jemez River nea
Page 113 and 114: Rio Grande at Albuquerque, NM 2,000
Page 115 and 116: Table 5-6. Reservoirs and Lakes (gr
Page 117 and 118: Table 5-7. Dams with Dam Safety Def
Page 119 and 120: Tsj Southern Rocky Mountain Colorad
Page 121 and 122: In order to evaluate changes in wat
Page 123 and 124: 5,025 5,020 351852106344901 Aquifer
Page 125 and 126: Source: NMED, 2014a and 2014c Note:
Page 127 and 128: Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load
Page 133: Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load
Page 137 and 138: Table 5-9. Municipal and Industrial
Page 139 and 140: Table 5-10. Groundwater Discharge P
Page 145 and 146: Table 5-11. Superfund Sites in the
Page 147 and 148: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
Page 161 and 162: Table 5-13. Landfills in the Middle
Page 163 and 164: Runoff, flooding, and debris flows
Page 165 and 166: • The minimum annual yield for ke
Page 167: Table 6-1. Total Withdrawals in the
Page 170 and 171: P:\_NM15-203\RWPs_2016\12_MRG\Figur
Page 176 and 177: • Riparian evapotranspiration: So
Page 178 and 179: The Arrowhead Center at NMSU analyz
Page 180 and 181: • The continued presence of Sandi
Page 182 and 183: to 669,727 acres. Also, during that
Page 184 and 185:
For this regional water plan update
Page 186 and 187:
Table 6-4. 2010 Water Withdrawals f
Page 188 and 189:
Table 6-4 2010 Water Withdrawals fo
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
• Consumptive use occurs when wat
Page 196 and 197:
estrictions (i.e., the water is phy
Page 198 and 199:
demand in this sector. The amount o
Page 200 and 201:
6.5.2 Middle Rio Grande Projected W
Page 202 and 203:
Table 6-5 Projected Water Demand, 2
Page 204 and 205:
Within Bernalillo County, the high
Page 206 and 207:
P:\_NM15-203\RWPs_2016\12_Middle Ri
Page 208 and 209:
• Priority for Continued Implemen
Page 210 and 211:
When the 2004 RWP was developed the
Page 212 and 213:
Table 8-2. Key Collaborative Progra
Page 214 and 215:
Table 8-2. Key Collaborative Progra
Page 216 and 217:
Bartolino, James R. and James C. Co
Page 218 and 219:
Hawley, J.W. 1986. Physiographic pr
Page 220 and 221:
The Middle Rio Grande-Albuquerque R
Page 222 and 223:
New Mexico Environment Department (
Page 224 and 225:
S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc.
Page 226 and 227:
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2014
Page 228 and 229:
Middle Rio Grande Region 12 RWP Mas
Page 230 and 231:
Riley Middle Rio Grande Region 12 R
Page 232 and 233:
Appendix 2-B Summary of Comments on
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Appendix 6-A List of Individuals In
Page 252 and 253:
Appendix 6-B Projected Population G
Page 254 and 255:
Appendix 8-A Review of 2004 Strateg
Page 256 and 257:
Appendix 8-A. Steering Committee Re
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280:
Planning Region Middle Rio Grande M
Page 284:
Regional Water Planning Update Proj
Page 288:
Regional Water Planning Update Proj
Page 291:
Regional Water Planning Update Infr
Page 295:
Regional Water Planning Update Infr
Page 299:
Planning Region Middle Rio Grande M
show all

Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?