Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan
2iUWd5b 2iUWd5b
5.3.1 Regional Hydrogeology The accepted Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan, 2000-2050 (MRCOG and MRGWA, 2004), did not independently investigate or describe the hydrogeology of the region, but abstracts to relevant publications (Thorn et al., 1993; McAda and Barroll, 2002; Bartolino and Cole, 2002; MRCOG and MRGWA, 2001; MRGWA and MRCOG, 2000; SSP&A, 2000; JSAI and Pioneer West, 2000; NMOSE/NMISC, 2002; Niemi and McGuckin, 1997; Scurlock, 1998) were included as an appendix. A map illustrating the surface geology of the planning region, derived from a geologic map of the entire state of New Mexico by the New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources (2003), is included as Figure 5-10. As shown on this figure, portions of six physiographic regions exist within the planning region. The Albuquerque-Belen portion of the Middle Rio Grande Basin, a north-south trending basin in the Rio Grande rift, is the primary groundwater supply in the region. The basin is bound on the north by Cochiti Pueblo, on the south by San Acacia, on the east by the Sandia and Manzano Mountains, and on the west by Llano de Albuquerque or West Mesa. Sediments that have accumulated in this basin are part of the Santa Fe Group (Hansen and Gorbach, 1997). Only the upper part is an important aquifer, and this saturated portion of the upper Santa Fe Group rarely exceeds 1,000 feet (Hansen and Gorbach, 1997). The Santa Fe Group sediments adjacent to the Rio Grande are overlain by 60 to 80 feet of valley-fill sediments, referred to as alluvium or post- Santa Fe fill (Hansen and Gorbach, 1997). Groundwater is transmitted readily through the alluvium and the upper portion of the Santa Fe Group. The most productive lithologies are the fluvial axial channel deposits of the ancestral Rio Grande and, to a lesser extent, the pediment slope and alluvial-fan deposits (Thorn et al., 1993). Outside of the Albuquerque-Belen basin, groundwater supplies are more limited. Volcanic and alluvial deposits supply small amounts of groundwater in the Jemez Mountains, and sandstone and limestone supply domestic wells and small water systems in the East Mountain area. 5.3.2 Aquifer Conditions Water enters the Santa Fe Group aquifer system from four main settings: mountain fronts and tributaries to the Rio Grande, the inner valley of the Rio Grande, the Rio Grande, and subsurface basin margins. Water entering the aquifer from the first three settings is usually termed recharge, whereas water entering the basin from the subsurface is typically termed underflow. Groundwater discharges from the Santa Fe Group aquifer system in several ways: pumping from wells, seepage into the Rio Grande and riverside drains, spring flow, evapotranspiration, and subsurface outflow to the Socorro Basin (Bartolino and Cole, 2002). Middle Rio Grande Regional Water Plan 2017 96
Tsj Southern Rocky Mountain Colorado Plateau (Navajo Section) Kkf Tn Kls Toa Yg Qbt Qr Qbt Qvr Qa Kmf Km 550 Yg Xg Qbt ^c Tnv Qbt Kmm Jm ^c Tsf QTsf Qa Qp Colorado Plateau (Acoma-Zuni Section) Kml Kml Qa Tsf QTsf 550 Tpb 25 Tsf S:\PROJECTS\WR12.0165_STATE_WATER_PLAN_2012\GIS\MXDS\FIGURES_2017\MIDDLE_RIO_GRANDE\FIG5-10A_GEOLOGY.MXD 12/21/2016 Colorado Plateau (Acoma-Zuni Section) N 0 8 16 Miles Qa *m Qp Kcc Qp Mexican Highland (Rio Grande Subsection) 40 Sandoval Bernalillo Bernalillo Qb Valencia QTs Qe Qe Qp QTs 25 Explanation Physiographic province County Water planning region Qp Qa QTs QTs QTs Qp Qp Yg 40 Valencia Torrance * *m *m ^ 66 Sources: 1. NMBGMR, 2003 2. DBS&A, 2005 3. Hawley, 1986 Basin and Range (Mexican Highland Section) MIDDLE RIO GRANDE REGIONAL WATER PLAN 2017 Geology and Physiographic Provinces Figure 5-10a
- Page 67 and 68: • Gather information on domestic
- Page 69 and 70: plan recognizes that water is easil
- Page 71 and 72: • Protect groundwater by preventi
- Page 73 and 74: not adequately consider all of the
- Page 75 and 76: 4.2.2 Water Quality Laws 4.2.2.1 Fe
- Page 77 and 78: National Priorities List (NPL). 42
- Page 79 and 80: • The Jicarilla Apache Nation Cod
- Page 81 and 82: • Water users seeking to obtain w
- Page 83 and 84: • The Federal Emergency Managemen
- Page 85 and 86: water balance in the Middle Rio Gra
- Page 87 and 88: Table 5-1. Middle Rio Grande Climat
- Page 89 and 90: Sources: 1. WRCC, 2014 2. NWS, 2005
- Page 91 and 92: Jemez Springs Temperature (°F) 90
- Page 93 and 94: Jemez Springs Precipitation (inches
- Page 95 and 96: drought monitoring systems, and it
- Page 97 and 98: Climate Division 5 14 12 10 8 6 4 2
- Page 99 and 100: expected. To assess climate trends
- Page 101 and 102: Rio Chama La Jara JEMEZ RIVER NEAR
- Page 103 and 104: Table 5-4a. USGS Stream Gage Statio
- Page 105 and 106: Table 5-4a. USGS Stream Gage Statio
- Page 107 and 108: Table 5-4b. USGS Stream Gage Annual
- Page 109 and 110: Table 5-5. USGS Stream Gage Average
- Page 111 and 112: 1,200,000 1,000,000 Jemez River nea
- Page 113 and 114: Rio Grande at Albuquerque, NM 2,000
- Page 115 and 116: Table 5-6. Reservoirs and Lakes (gr
- Page 117: Table 5-7. Dams with Dam Safety Def
- Page 121 and 122: In order to evaluate changes in wat
- Page 123 and 124: 5,025 5,020 351852106344901 Aquifer
- Page 125 and 126: Source: NMED, 2014a and 2014c Note:
- Page 127 and 128: Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load
- Page 129 and 130: Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load
- Page 131 and 132: Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load
- Page 133 and 134: Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load
- Page 135 and 136: Table 5-8. Total Maximum Daily Load
- Page 137 and 138: Table 5-9. Municipal and Industrial
- Page 139 and 140: Table 5-10. Groundwater Discharge P
- Page 141 and 142: Table 5-10. Groundwater Discharge P
- Page 143 and 144: Table 5-10. Groundwater Discharge P
- Page 145 and 146: Table 5-11. Superfund Sites in the
- Page 147 and 148: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 149 and 150: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 151 and 152: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 153 and 154: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 155 and 156: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 157 and 158: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 159 and 160: Table 5-12. Leaking Underground Sto
- Page 161 and 162: Table 5-13. Landfills in the Middle
- Page 163 and 164: Runoff, flooding, and debris flows
- Page 165 and 166: • The minimum annual yield for ke
- Page 167: Table 6-1. Total Withdrawals in the
5.3.1 <strong>Regional</strong> Hydrogeology<br />
The accepted <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, 2000-2050 (MRCOG and MRGWA,<br />
2004), did not independently investigate or describe the hydrogeology of the region, but abstracts<br />
to relevant publications (Thorn et al., 1993; McAda and Barroll, 2002; Bartolino and Cole, 2002;<br />
MRCOG and MRGWA, 2001; MRGWA and MRCOG, 2000; SSP&A, 2000; JSAI and Pioneer<br />
West, 2000; NMOSE/NMISC, 2002; Niemi and McGuckin, 1997; Scurlock, 1998) were<br />
included as an appendix. A map illustrating the surface geology of the planning region, derived<br />
from a geologic map of the entire state of New Mexico by the New Mexico Bureau of Geology<br />
& Mineral Resources (2003), is included as Figure 5-10. As shown on this figure, portions of six<br />
physiographic regions exist within the planning region.<br />
The Albuquerque-Belen portion of the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> Basin, a north-south trending basin in<br />
the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> rift, is the primary groundwater supply in the region. The basin is bound on the<br />
north by Cochiti Pueblo, on the south by San Acacia, on the east by the Sandia and Manzano<br />
Mountains, and on the west by Llano de Albuquerque or West Mesa. Sediments that have<br />
accumulated in this basin are part of the Santa Fe Group (Hansen and Gorbach, 1997). Only the<br />
upper part is an important aquifer, and this saturated portion of the upper Santa Fe Group rarely<br />
exceeds 1,000 feet (Hansen and Gorbach, 1997). The Santa Fe Group sediments adjacent to the<br />
<strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> are overlain by 60 to 80 feet of valley-fill sediments, referred to as alluvium or post-<br />
Santa Fe fill (Hansen and Gorbach, 1997). Groundwater is transmitted readily through the<br />
alluvium and the upper portion of the Santa Fe Group. The most productive lithologies are the<br />
fluvial axial channel deposits of the ancestral <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> and, to a lesser extent, the pediment<br />
slope and alluvial-fan deposits (Thorn et al., 1993).<br />
Outside of the Albuquerque-Belen basin, groundwater supplies are more limited. Volcanic and<br />
alluvial deposits supply small amounts of groundwater in the Jemez Mountains, and sandstone<br />
and limestone supply domestic wells and small water systems in the East Mountain area.<br />
5.3.2 Aquifer Conditions<br />
<strong>Water</strong> enters the Santa Fe Group aquifer system from four main settings: mountain fronts and<br />
tributaries to the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong>, the inner valley of the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong>, the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong>, and subsurface<br />
basin margins. <strong>Water</strong> entering the aquifer from the first three settings is usually termed recharge,<br />
whereas water entering the basin from the subsurface is typically termed underflow.<br />
Groundwater discharges from the Santa Fe Group aquifer system in several ways: pumping from<br />
wells, seepage into the <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> and riverside drains, spring flow, evapotranspiration, and<br />
subsurface outflow to the Socorro Basin (Bartolino and Cole, 2002).<br />
<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Grande</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 2017 96