12.01.2017 Views

comm-appendix-support-cross

comm-appendix-support-cross

comm-appendix-support-cross

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8/1/2016 Exxon Confirmed Global Warming Consensus in 1982 with In-House Climate Models | InsideClimate News<br />

As the researchers alerted Exxon's upper<br />

management about the CO2 problem, the scientists<br />

worked to provide better estimates of when the<br />

warming trend would create noticeable damage,<br />

and how large the impacts might be.<br />

One scientist, Werner Glass, wrote an analysis in<br />

1981 for a senior vice president that said the rise In<br />

global temperatures would begin to be noticed In a<br />

few decades. But Glass hedged his bet, saying the<br />

magnitude of the change would be "well short of<br />

catastrophic" In the early years.<br />

Exxon manager Roger Cohen saw things differently.<br />

"I think that this statement may be too reassuring,"<br />

Cohen, director of the Theoretical and Mathematical<br />

Sciences Laboratory at Exxon Research, wrote in an<br />

August 18,1981 memo to Glass.<br />

vnchau .<br />

, iffttR-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE<br />

TO<br />

MOM<br />

W. Glass suojecr<br />

R. W. Cohen<br />

date August 18, 1981<br />

I have looked over the draft of the EED reply to the<br />

request from O'Loughlin. The only real problem I have is with<br />

the second clause of the last sentence in the first paragraph";<br />

"but changes of a magnitude well short of catastrophic..."<br />

I think that this statement may be too reassuring. Whereas<br />

I can agree with the statement that our best guess is that<br />

observable effects in the year 2030 are likely to be "well<br />

short of catastrophic", it is distinctly possible that the<br />

CPD scenario will later produce effects which will indeed be<br />

catastrophic (at least for a substantial fraction of the<br />

earth's population). This is because the global ecosystem<br />

in 2030 might still be in a transient, headed for much more<br />

significant effects after time lags perhaps of the order of<br />

decades. If this indeed turns out to be case, it is very<br />

likely that we will unambiguously recognize the threat by<br />

the year 2000 because of advances in climate modeling and<br />

the beginning of real experimental confirmation of the CO2<br />

effect. The effects of such a recognition on subsequent<br />

fossil fuel combustion are unpredictable, but one can say<br />

that predictions based only on our knowledge of availability<br />

and economics become hazardous.<br />

He called it "distinctly possible" that the projected<br />

warming trend after 2030 "will indeed be<br />

catastrophic (at least for a substantial fraction of the<br />

earth's population)."<br />

Cohen continued: "This is because the global<br />

ecosystem in 2030 might still be in a transient,<br />

headed for much significant effects after time lags<br />

perhaps of the order of decades."<br />

Cohen demonstrated a sophisticated understanding<br />

App. 530<br />

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/18092015/exxon-confirmed-global-warming-consensus-in-1982-with-in-house-climate-models 6/15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!