12.01.2017 Views

comm-appendix-support-cross

comm-appendix-support-cross

comm-appendix-support-cross

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Regional key risks and<br />

potential for risk reduction<br />

Polar Regions (Arctic and Antarctic)<br />

Risks for ecosystems<br />

•Wi<br />

•RUi<br />

•555<br />

•MBPil<br />

Glaciers,<br />

t snow, ice<br />

' and/or<br />

permafrost<br />

Risks for health<br />

and well-being<br />

—n<br />

Physical systems<br />

4<br />

Rivers, lakes, « Coastal erosion<br />

floods and/or . and/or sea level<br />

drought<br />

effects<br />

Unprecedented challenges,<br />

especially from rate of change<br />

fi fi<br />

Representative key risks for each region for<br />

.4. Terrestrial<br />

Iff. ecosystems<br />

Biological systems<br />

Wildfire<br />

Present<br />

Near term (2030-2040)<br />

Long term 2 0 C<br />

(2080-2100) .or<br />

. Marine<br />

ecosystems<br />

i- Risk level ^<br />

mm<br />

r 1 •<br />

Human and managed systems<br />

. Livelihoods, health<br />

production ' P| and/or economics<br />

Increased damages<br />

from wildfires<br />

Heat-related<br />

human mortality<br />

Increased damages<br />

from river and coastal<br />

urban floods<br />

; : , fi 3 .<br />

4<br />

Increased damages from<br />

river and coastal floods<br />

PS<br />

Increased water restrictions<br />

, ! 1<br />

mSmv<br />

Increased damages<br />

from extreme heat<br />

events and wildfires<br />

„ . . . Potential for n. ,<br />

Risk level with additional Risk level with<br />

high adaptation adaptation to current adaptation<br />

reduce risk<br />

Increased flood damage to<br />

infrastructure, livelihoods Heat-related<br />

and settlements A human mortality<br />

Increased droughtrelated<br />

water and<br />

food shortage<br />

Distributional<br />

shift and reduced<br />

fisheries catch<br />

potential at low latitudes<br />

Central and South America<br />

Reduced water availability and<br />

increased flooding and landslides<br />

Pi<br />

Increased mass coral<br />

bleaching and mortality<br />

! ! ,<br />

Coastal inundation<br />

and habitat loss<br />

OBSk^<br />

Pi<br />

fi<br />

Jt<br />

6%<br />

*•<br />

a<br />

Reduced food production and quality<br />

Spread of vector-borne diseases<br />

y#<br />

i not<br />

'C. -d<br />

Pi<br />

Reduced crop productivity and<br />

livelihood and food security<br />

i • • i<br />

Vector- and waterborne<br />

diseases<br />

Pi<br />

Loss of livelihoods,<br />

settlements, infrastructure,<br />

ecosystem services and<br />

economic stability 1<br />

|<br />

rA<br />

whmmZ'<br />

Risks for low-lying<br />

coastal areas '<br />

*<br />

fi<br />

Significant change in composition<br />

and structure of coral reer systems<br />

•whm<br />

Increased flood damage<br />

to infrastructure and<br />

settlements<br />

U ' 1<br />

1 1<br />

Increased risks to<br />

coastal infrastructure<br />

and low-lying<br />

ecosystems<br />

4<br />

h pi<br />

App. 462<br />

Figure SPIVI.8 j Representative key risks 11 for each region, including the potential for risk reduction through adaptation and mitigation, as well as limits to adaptation. Each key risk is assessed as<br />

very low, low, medium, high or very high. Risk levels are presented for three time frames: present, near term (here, for 2030-2040) and long term (here, for 2080-2100). In the near term, projected<br />

levels of global mean temperature increase do not diverge substantially a<strong>cross</strong> different emission scenarios. For the long term, risk levels are presented for two possible futures (2°C and 4 0 C global<br />

mean temperature increase above pre-industrial levels). For each timeframe, risk levels are indicated for a continuation of current adaptation and assuming high levels of current or future adaptation.<br />

Risk levels are not necessarily comparable, especially a<strong>cross</strong> regions. {Figure 2.4}<br />

14<br />

Identification of key risks was based on expert judgment using the following specific criteria; large magnitude, high probability or irreversibility of impacts; timing of impacts; persistent vulnerability<br />

or exposure contributing to risks; or limited potential to reduce risks through adaptation or mitigation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!