A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, 1 February 1951 42,43,45<br />
Critical separation experiment, two large 235 U metal masses in water; multiple excursions; insignificant<br />
exposures.<br />
A water reflected system was set up in 1949 to<br />
obtain the neutron multiplication <strong>of</strong> a single unit <strong>of</strong><br />
fissile metal in water. The system had two scram<br />
devices. The first, with a quick response, consisted <strong>of</strong> a<br />
pneumatic cylinder that raised the unit out <strong>of</strong> the water;<br />
the second, a slower device, was the draining <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tank. Later, a traveling support was added so that<br />
critical separation distances between two units could<br />
be determined; a dropping cadmium screen provided<br />
an additional scram (Figure 45).<br />
The excursion was precipitated by an experiment<br />
that measured the critical separation distance <strong>of</strong> two<br />
enriched uranium masses (each <strong>of</strong> 93.5% 235 U) in<br />
water: one, a solid cylinder <strong>of</strong> 24.4 kg and the other, a<br />
hollow cylinder <strong>of</strong> 38.5 kg. Sheet cadmium 10 mils<br />
thick was fastened to the outer surface <strong>of</strong> the solid<br />
cylinder and to the inside surface <strong>of</strong> the hollow<br />
cylinder. A paraffin slug filled the cavity in the hollow<br />
cylinder.<br />
At the completion <strong>of</strong> the critical separation experiment<br />
(at a multiplication <strong>of</strong> 65.5), the assembly was<br />
scrammed. The water started draining, the cadmium<br />
screen dropped, the solid cylinder (left-hand body in<br />
Figure 45) was lifting, and an excursion (later deter-<br />
mined to be 10 17 fissions) was made evident by the<br />
jamming <strong>of</strong> neutron counters and the appearance on<br />
television <strong>of</strong> a vapor cloud above the water.<br />
Later reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the accident showed that the<br />
pneumatic tangential scram was the first to be effective<br />
and led directly to two types <strong>of</strong> difficulty. First, the<br />
center <strong>of</strong> reactivity <strong>of</strong> the left-hand cylinder (Figure<br />
45) proved to be below that <strong>of</strong> the stationary<br />
cylinder; second, the rapid lift through the water<br />
created hydrodynamic forces that swung the cylinders<br />
closer together. The combination <strong>of</strong> the two effects was<br />
enough to drive the assembly prompt critical and to<br />
have maintained at least this much reactivity for<br />
0.2 seconds if the power excursion had not occurred.<br />
The first power spike is estimated to have contained<br />
6 × 10 15 fissions. It is possible that one or more<br />
excursions into the prompt region followed because<br />
boiling was the primary quenching mechanism.<br />
In this excursion <strong>of</strong> 10 17 fissions, no radiation doses<br />
were received, and no contamination was found in the<br />
experimental area. Damage to the uranium consisted <strong>of</strong><br />
a small amount <strong>of</strong> oxide flaking and blistering. The<br />
experimental area was in use two days later.<br />
Figure 45. The Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory assembly machine employed for measurements <strong>of</strong> critical<br />
separation distances.<br />
77