09.12.2012 Views

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, 1 February 1951 42,43,45<br />

Critical separation experiment, two large 235 U metal masses in water; multiple excursions; insignificant<br />

exposures.<br />

A water reflected system was set up in 1949 to<br />

obtain the neutron multiplication <strong>of</strong> a single unit <strong>of</strong><br />

fissile metal in water. The system had two scram<br />

devices. The first, with a quick response, consisted <strong>of</strong> a<br />

pneumatic cylinder that raised the unit out <strong>of</strong> the water;<br />

the second, a slower device, was the draining <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tank. Later, a traveling support was added so that<br />

critical separation distances between two units could<br />

be determined; a dropping cadmium screen provided<br />

an additional scram (Figure 45).<br />

The excursion was precipitated by an experiment<br />

that measured the critical separation distance <strong>of</strong> two<br />

enriched uranium masses (each <strong>of</strong> 93.5% 235 U) in<br />

water: one, a solid cylinder <strong>of</strong> 24.4 kg and the other, a<br />

hollow cylinder <strong>of</strong> 38.5 kg. Sheet cadmium 10 mils<br />

thick was fastened to the outer surface <strong>of</strong> the solid<br />

cylinder and to the inside surface <strong>of</strong> the hollow<br />

cylinder. A paraffin slug filled the cavity in the hollow<br />

cylinder.<br />

At the completion <strong>of</strong> the critical separation experiment<br />

(at a multiplication <strong>of</strong> 65.5), the assembly was<br />

scrammed. The water started draining, the cadmium<br />

screen dropped, the solid cylinder (left-hand body in<br />

Figure 45) was lifting, and an excursion (later deter-<br />

mined to be 10 17 fissions) was made evident by the<br />

jamming <strong>of</strong> neutron counters and the appearance on<br />

television <strong>of</strong> a vapor cloud above the water.<br />

Later reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the accident showed that the<br />

pneumatic tangential scram was the first to be effective<br />

and led directly to two types <strong>of</strong> difficulty. First, the<br />

center <strong>of</strong> reactivity <strong>of</strong> the left-hand cylinder (Figure<br />

45) proved to be below that <strong>of</strong> the stationary<br />

cylinder; second, the rapid lift through the water<br />

created hydrodynamic forces that swung the cylinders<br />

closer together. The combination <strong>of</strong> the two effects was<br />

enough to drive the assembly prompt critical and to<br />

have maintained at least this much reactivity for<br />

0.2 seconds if the power excursion had not occurred.<br />

The first power spike is estimated to have contained<br />

6 × 10 15 fissions. It is possible that one or more<br />

excursions into the prompt region followed because<br />

boiling was the primary quenching mechanism.<br />

In this excursion <strong>of</strong> 10 17 fissions, no radiation doses<br />

were received, and no contamination was found in the<br />

experimental area. Damage to the uranium consisted <strong>of</strong><br />

a small amount <strong>of</strong> oxide flaking and blistering. The<br />

experimental area was in use two days later.<br />

Figure 45. The Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory assembly machine employed for measurements <strong>of</strong> critical<br />

separation distances.<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!