A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
68<br />
II. REACTOR AND CRITICAL EXPERIMENT ACCIDENTS<br />
This section brings out errors that should be avoided<br />
in the conduct <strong>of</strong> reactor experiments and critical<br />
experiments. Because criticality is expected, lessons<br />
learned from this section do not contribute directly to<br />
the discipline <strong>of</strong> process criticality safety. Of the 38<br />
accidents studied, 5 occurred in what must be categorized<br />
as working reactors (the water boiler, Godiva,<br />
Dragon, SL-1, and NRX) and 33 occurred in critical<br />
facilities where the properties <strong>of</strong> the assemblies<br />
themselves were being investigated.<br />
The major change to Part II <strong>of</strong> this second revision<br />
is the inclusion <strong>of</strong> six accidents that occurred in the<br />
Russian Federation. Four <strong>of</strong> these involved small<br />
uranium or plutonium metal assemblies; two occurred<br />
with assemblies involving reactor core mockups.<br />
One minor change in this section is the deletion <strong>of</strong><br />
what was listed in the prior editions as II-D.2 The<br />
U.S.S.R, 1953 or 1954. Based on research <strong>of</strong> the listed<br />
reference and discussions with Russian experts, it has<br />
been concluded that the reference was not to a reactor<br />
accident but to some other source <strong>of</strong> personnel<br />
radiation exposure.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the reactor and critical experiment accident<br />
data are summarized in Table 11. Where possible and<br />
appropriate, the excursion fission energy is divided into<br />
that which was created in the spike and that which was<br />
in the plateau. For some excursions, almost all fissions<br />
were in the plateau; others consisted only <strong>of</strong> a single<br />
spike.<br />
Table 11. Reactor and Critical Experiment <strong>Accidents</strong><br />
Event Date Location Material Geometry Damage<br />
Total<br />
Fissions<br />
II-A FISSILE SOLUTION SYSTEMS<br />
1 12-49 Los Alamos, NM ~1 kg 235 U as uranyl Sphere, graphite None ~3 × 10<br />
nitrate<br />
reflected<br />
16<br />
2 16-11-51 Richland, WA 1.15 kg Pu as nitrate Bare sphere, 93%<br />
filled<br />
None 8 × 10 16<br />
3 26-05-54 Oak Ridge, TN 18.3 kg 235 U as uranyl Cylindrical None 1 × 10<br />
flouride<br />
annulus, bare<br />
17<br />
4 01-12-56 Oak Ridge, TN 27.7 kg 235 U as uranyl<br />
flouride<br />
Cylindrical bare Minor 1.6 × 10 17<br />
5 30-01-68 Oak Ridge, TN 0.95 kg 233 U as nitrate Sphere, water Local 1.1 × 10<br />
reflected contamination<br />
16<br />
II-B BARE AND REFLECTED METAL SYSTEMS<br />
1 21-08-45 Los Alamos, NM 6.2 kg δ-phase Pu Sphere with WC None (one ~1 × 10<br />
reflector fatality)<br />
16<br />
2 21-05-46 Los Alamos, NM 6.2 kg δ-phase Pu Sphere with Be None (one ~3 × 10<br />
reflector fatality)<br />
15<br />
3 1-02-51 Los Alamos, NM 62.9 kg U(93) metal Cylinder and<br />
annulus in water<br />
Minor ~1 × 10 17<br />
4 18-04-52 Los Alamos, NM 92.4 kg U(93) metal Cylinder,<br />
unreflected<br />
None 1.5 × 10 16<br />
5 9-04-53 Sarov, R.F. ~8 kg δ-phase Pu Sphere with Major core ~1 × 10<br />
natural U reflector damage<br />
16<br />
6 3-02-54 Los Alamos, NM 53 kg U(93) metal Sphere,<br />
unreflected<br />
Minor 5.6 × 10 16<br />
7 12-02-57 Los Alamos, NM 54 kg U(93) metal Sphere,<br />
unreflected<br />
Severe 1.2 × 10 17<br />
8 17-06-60 Los Alamos, NM ~51 kg U(93) metal Cylinder with C<br />
reflector<br />
Minor 6 × 10 16<br />
9 10-11-61 Oak Ridge, TN ~75 kg U(93) metal Paraffin reflected None ~1 × 10 16