09.12.2012 Views

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68<br />

II. REACTOR AND CRITICAL EXPERIMENT ACCIDENTS<br />

This section brings out errors that should be avoided<br />

in the conduct <strong>of</strong> reactor experiments and critical<br />

experiments. Because criticality is expected, lessons<br />

learned from this section do not contribute directly to<br />

the discipline <strong>of</strong> process criticality safety. Of the 38<br />

accidents studied, 5 occurred in what must be categorized<br />

as working reactors (the water boiler, Godiva,<br />

Dragon, SL-1, and NRX) and 33 occurred in critical<br />

facilities where the properties <strong>of</strong> the assemblies<br />

themselves were being investigated.<br />

The major change to Part II <strong>of</strong> this second revision<br />

is the inclusion <strong>of</strong> six accidents that occurred in the<br />

Russian Federation. Four <strong>of</strong> these involved small<br />

uranium or plutonium metal assemblies; two occurred<br />

with assemblies involving reactor core mockups.<br />

One minor change in this section is the deletion <strong>of</strong><br />

what was listed in the prior editions as II-D.2 The<br />

U.S.S.R, 1953 or 1954. Based on research <strong>of</strong> the listed<br />

reference and discussions with Russian experts, it has<br />

been concluded that the reference was not to a reactor<br />

accident but to some other source <strong>of</strong> personnel<br />

radiation exposure.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the reactor and critical experiment accident<br />

data are summarized in Table 11. Where possible and<br />

appropriate, the excursion fission energy is divided into<br />

that which was created in the spike and that which was<br />

in the plateau. For some excursions, almost all fissions<br />

were in the plateau; others consisted only <strong>of</strong> a single<br />

spike.<br />

Table 11. Reactor and Critical Experiment <strong>Accidents</strong><br />

Event Date Location Material Geometry Damage<br />

Total<br />

Fissions<br />

II-A FISSILE SOLUTION SYSTEMS<br />

1 12-49 Los Alamos, NM ~1 kg 235 U as uranyl Sphere, graphite None ~3 × 10<br />

nitrate<br />

reflected<br />

16<br />

2 16-11-51 Richland, WA 1.15 kg Pu as nitrate Bare sphere, 93%<br />

filled<br />

None 8 × 10 16<br />

3 26-05-54 Oak Ridge, TN 18.3 kg 235 U as uranyl Cylindrical None 1 × 10<br />

flouride<br />

annulus, bare<br />

17<br />

4 01-12-56 Oak Ridge, TN 27.7 kg 235 U as uranyl<br />

flouride<br />

Cylindrical bare Minor 1.6 × 10 17<br />

5 30-01-68 Oak Ridge, TN 0.95 kg 233 U as nitrate Sphere, water Local 1.1 × 10<br />

reflected contamination<br />

16<br />

II-B BARE AND REFLECTED METAL SYSTEMS<br />

1 21-08-45 Los Alamos, NM 6.2 kg δ-phase Pu Sphere with WC None (one ~1 × 10<br />

reflector fatality)<br />

16<br />

2 21-05-46 Los Alamos, NM 6.2 kg δ-phase Pu Sphere with Be None (one ~3 × 10<br />

reflector fatality)<br />

15<br />

3 1-02-51 Los Alamos, NM 62.9 kg U(93) metal Cylinder and<br />

annulus in water<br />

Minor ~1 × 10 17<br />

4 18-04-52 Los Alamos, NM 92.4 kg U(93) metal Cylinder,<br />

unreflected<br />

None 1.5 × 10 16<br />

5 9-04-53 Sarov, R.F. ~8 kg δ-phase Pu Sphere with Major core ~1 × 10<br />

natural U reflector damage<br />

16<br />

6 3-02-54 Los Alamos, NM 53 kg U(93) metal Sphere,<br />

unreflected<br />

Minor 5.6 × 10 16<br />

7 12-02-57 Los Alamos, NM 54 kg U(93) metal Sphere,<br />

unreflected<br />

Severe 1.2 × 10 17<br />

8 17-06-60 Los Alamos, NM ~51 kg U(93) metal Cylinder with C<br />

reflector<br />

Minor 6 × 10 16<br />

9 10-11-61 Oak Ridge, TN ~75 kg U(93) metal Paraffin reflected None ~1 × 10 16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!