A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
235 U Spherical Critical Mass (kg)<br />
100<br />
10<br />
1<br />
9<br />
0.8<br />
20 100 500 1000 2000<br />
Figure 38. Critical masses <strong>of</strong> water-reflected spheres <strong>of</strong> hydrogen-moderated U(93), U(30.3), U(5.00), U(3.00), and<br />
U(2.00). The accidents are shown by numbered circles.<br />
Fission Yields<br />
Table 10 lists the estimated fission energy releases<br />
for the 22 accidents. An attempt has been made to<br />
categorize the spike yield in this edition in a manner<br />
consistent with the prior two editions <strong>of</strong> this report and<br />
definitions in the appendix. These definitions are<br />
repeated here for convenience.<br />
spike (in a prompt power excursion): The initial<br />
power pulse <strong>of</strong> a prompt power excursion, limited by<br />
the shutdown mechanism. See excursion, prompt<br />
power.<br />
excursion, prompt power: A nuclear excursion as<br />
the result <strong>of</strong> a prompt critical configuration <strong>of</strong> fissile<br />
material. In general, a sharp power spike followed by a<br />
plateau that may be interrupted by smaller spikes.<br />
From solution excursion experimental data, such as<br />
many <strong>of</strong> the CRAC4 and SILENE3 experiments, it is<br />
apparent that there is a smooth transition from excursions<br />
in which the maximum reactivity did not reach<br />
prompt critical to those in which it slightly exceeded<br />
prompt critical. There is no significant distinction<br />
H/ 235 U Atomic Ratio<br />
U(2)F –Paraffin<br />
2<br />
U(3)F –Paraffin<br />
2<br />
U(5)O2F2 Solution<br />
U(30.3)O F Solution<br />
2 2<br />
U(93)O F Solution<br />
2 2<br />
Calculated UO F –Water<br />
2 2<br />
Calculated UF –Paraffin<br />
4<br />
22<br />
15<br />
between the power histories <strong>of</strong> two excursions, one<br />
having a maximum reactivity <strong>of</strong> $0.90 and the other<br />
having a maximum reactivity <strong>of</strong> $1.10. They both<br />
exhibit an initial spike followed by less energetic,<br />
recurring spikes at approximately 10 to 20 second<br />
intervals, eventually leading to a quasi–plateau. Only<br />
when the maximum reactivity attained is about $0.50<br />
or less is the traditional spike not present.<br />
Another result <strong>of</strong> the CRAC 4 and SILENE 3 experiments<br />
that can be compared to the accident yields<br />
listed in Table 10 is the specific yield <strong>of</strong> the first<br />
excursion, the spike. For experiments with a maximum<br />
reactivity <strong>of</strong> about $0.50 or more, the specific yield <strong>of</strong><br />
the spike was always about 1.0 × 10 15 fissions per liter<br />
except for very fast excursions, those that achieved<br />
inverse periods much greater than 100 s –1 . For these<br />
very fast excursions, specific yields up to several times<br />
10 15 fissions per liter were measured. The accidents for<br />
which a spike yield is given in Table 10 are consistent<br />
with the specific yields <strong>of</strong> the CRAC 4 and SILENE 3<br />
data in that none exceeded a few times 10 15 fissions<br />
per liter. However, there are three reported spike yields<br />
61