A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
to 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, 30.3, and 93.0. <strong>Accidents</strong> 9, 15, and 22<br />
are superimposed on this figure. Since the curves in<br />
Figure 38 are for water reflected systems, these points<br />
have been adjusted downward since the actual accidents<br />
were relatively unreflected.<br />
Additional adjustments to fissile density and<br />
estimated critical spherical mass could be performed.<br />
For example, the effects <strong>of</strong> nitrate absorption and<br />
organic versus aqueous base composition could be<br />
included in the estimates. Of course, judgment is<br />
required as to whether such adjustments are meaningful<br />
and whether carrying out such adjustments would<br />
lead to estimates in closer agreement with the curves<br />
presented in Figures 37, 38, and 39. Such adjustments<br />
cannot be justified. The absence <strong>of</strong> technical detail<br />
provided in the accident descriptions prevents meaningful<br />
refinement <strong>of</strong> the estimates. This lack <strong>of</strong><br />
technical information also precludes any attempt for<br />
meaningful, more detailed, neutronic computer<br />
modeling.<br />
235 U Spherical Critical Mass (kg)<br />
60<br />
200<br />
100<br />
10<br />
1<br />
19<br />
13<br />
Data From Spheres<br />
Data Derived From Cylinders<br />
Calculated Metal–Water Mixtures<br />
Calculated UO2 –Water Mixtures<br />
4<br />
6<br />
14<br />
0.16 cm Stainless Steel<br />
Reflector<br />
12<br />
16<br />
2<br />
8<br />
Density <strong>of</strong> 235 U (kg/ )<br />
Conclusions<br />
Considering the effects <strong>of</strong> partial reflection and<br />
inherent uncertainties in the estimates, it is judged that<br />
the position <strong>of</strong> 18 <strong>of</strong> the 21 points plotted in Figures 37,<br />
38, and 39 are sufficient for establishing credible<br />
agreement between the reported accident conditions and<br />
known conditions for criticality. The estimates for<br />
accidents 1, 7, and 9 appear to be somewhat questionable<br />
in that more mass than reported in the accident would be<br />
required for criticality under the hypothesized unreflected<br />
accident conditions. However, accidents 1 and 7, would<br />
be in reasonable agreement if the partial reflection<br />
present during the accident were taken into account. It<br />
should be noted that for these two cases, the “missing”<br />
mass is no greater in magnitude than other accident reconstructions<br />
(notably, accidents 12, 14, and 17) in which<br />
the reported mass exceeds the known conditions for<br />
criticality. The discrepancy surrounding accident 9 is also<br />
consistent with the large reported uncertainty in the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> mass present. No systematic features are<br />
distinguishable that differentiate the R.F., U.S., U.K., and<br />
Japanese accidents.<br />
Water<br />
Reflector<br />
Limiting Critical Density<br />
Metal<br />
0.5<br />
0.01 0.1 1 10 20<br />
Figure 37. Critical masses <strong>of</strong> homogeneous water moderated U(93.2) spheres. Solution data appear unless indicated<br />
otherwise. The accidents are shown by numbered circles.<br />
3