09.12.2012 Views

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

operator stood to pour the solution. The second<br />

operator stood on the floor and held the funnel.<br />

Completion <strong>of</strong> the four batches concluded the threeperson<br />

team’s work for that day.<br />

The next day, 30 September, the three operators<br />

began dissolving the final three batches that would be<br />

required to complete the job. After transferring batches<br />

five and six, the pouring <strong>of</strong> the seventh batch was<br />

begun around 10:35. Almost at the end <strong>of</strong> the pour<br />

(183 g <strong>of</strong> uranium were recovered from the flask) the<br />

gamma alarms sounded in this building and in the two<br />

nearby commercial fuel buildings. Workers evacuated<br />

from all buildings according to prescribed plans and<br />

proceeded to the muster area on site. At this location,<br />

gamma ray dose rates far above background were<br />

detected and it was suspected that a criticality accident<br />

had occurred and was ongoing.<br />

The muster location was then moved to a more<br />

remote part <strong>of</strong> the plant site where dose rates were near<br />

to background values. The excursion continued for<br />

nearly twenty hours before it was terminated by<br />

deliberate actions authorized and directed by govern-<br />

54<br />

A<br />

Authorized Procedure<br />

2.4 kg U O 3 8<br />

Batch<br />

B<br />

Executed Procedure<br />

2.4 kg U 3 O 8<br />

Batch<br />

Dissolver<br />

10 Stainless Steel<br />

Bucket<br />

Nitric Acid<br />

Nitric Acid<br />

5 Flask<br />

Geometrically<br />

Favorable Vessel<br />

Figure 34. Authorized and executed procedures.<br />

4 Bottles<br />

Product Solution UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2<br />

Precipitation<br />

Tank B<br />

Product<br />

Solution<br />

UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2<br />

ment <strong>of</strong>ficials. During this time there were several<br />

noteworthy aspects <strong>of</strong> this accident. First, the JCO<br />

Company was not prepared to respond to a criticality<br />

accident - the gamma alarms were not part <strong>of</strong> a<br />

criticality accident alarm system. In fact, the license<br />

agreement stated that a criticality accident was not a<br />

credible event. Thus expertise and neutron detectors<br />

had to be brought in from nearby nuclear facilities.<br />

Various monitoring devices at the facility as well as the<br />

nearby Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute<br />

(JAERI), recorded the excursion history. These<br />

showed, after a large initial spike, that the power level<br />

quasi-stabilized, dropping gradually by about a factor<br />

<strong>of</strong> two over the first ~17 hours.<br />

About 4.5 hours after the start <strong>of</strong> the accident,<br />

radiation readings taken at the site boundary nearest to<br />

a residential house and a commercial establishment<br />

showed combined neutron and gamma ray dose rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> about 5 mSv/hour. At this time the Mayor <strong>of</strong> Tokaimura<br />

recommended that residents living within a<br />

350 m radius <strong>of</strong> the JCO plant evacuate to more remote<br />

locations. After 12 hours, local, Ibaraki-ken, govern-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!