09.12.2012 Views

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20. Siberian Chemical Combine, 13 December 1978<br />

Plutonium metal ingots in a storage container; single excursion; one serious exposure, seven significant<br />

exposures.<br />

Various operations with α-phase plutonium metal<br />

ingots were performed in Building 901, Department 1,<br />

<strong>of</strong> this plant. There were 16 interconnected gloveboxes<br />

manned by a total <strong>of</strong> 7 operators. Although the<br />

operators were trained on all <strong>of</strong> the individual operations,<br />

each would be assigned only a particular subset<br />

at the beginning <strong>of</strong> each shift. By written procedure, it<br />

was not allowed for an operator to deviate from his<br />

assigned tasks even if the deviation involved assisting<br />

others with their tasks.<br />

Transfer and temporary storage <strong>of</strong> the ingots within<br />

the gloveboxes was accomplished using cylindrical<br />

storage containers designed specifically for this<br />

purpose. The containers were lined with a 0.5 mm<br />

thick cadmium layer and had a 30 mm thick shell <strong>of</strong><br />

polyethylene encased in a stainless steel sleeve<br />

(Figure 28). The design decreased the neutron interaction<br />

for a planar array to such a degree that it was not<br />

necessary to control the number or storage arrangement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the containers within any <strong>of</strong> the gloveboxes.<br />

The ingots were produced from a direct oxide<br />

reduction process and were in the shape <strong>of</strong> a frustum <strong>of</strong><br />

a cone. The dimensions <strong>of</strong> the ingots are no longer<br />

Stainless<br />

Steel can <strong>of</strong><br />

unknown wall<br />

thickness<br />

~152 mm<br />

Polyethylene<br />

~30 mm side walls, floor, and lid<br />

Figure 28. Storage container.<br />

To Glovebox 6 (via conveyor)<br />

~0.5 mm Cadmium liner on<br />

all internal surfaces<br />

~192 mm<br />

~222 mm<br />

1392 1391-A 1391-B<br />

Figure 29. A simplified layout <strong>of</strong> Glovebox 13.<br />

known. Depending on the origin <strong>of</strong> the feed material<br />

the upper mass limit <strong>of</strong> an ingot was either 2 kg (waste<br />

recovery, precipitation/calcination) or 4 kg (relatively<br />

pure oxide). The general administrative limit for the<br />

storage containers in this building allowed up to<br />

2 ingots totaling 4 kg or less. However, the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

container did not preclude the possibility <strong>of</strong> loading<br />

multiple ingots to levels in excess <strong>of</strong> a critical mass. It<br />

was assumed that the operating personnel, because <strong>of</strong><br />

their pr<strong>of</strong>iciency and discipline, would not make gross<br />

errors (more than twice the administrative limit) in<br />

loading the containers or ignore the safety limits.<br />

Glovebox 13, where the criticality accident took<br />

place, consisted <strong>of</strong> three workstations, (1391-A,<br />

1391-B, and 1392, see Figure 29) and was connected<br />

to gloveboxes 12 and 6 by a pass–through port and<br />

conveyor, respectively. All <strong>of</strong> the ingots produced at<br />

the plant passed through this glovebox operation. For<br />

these particular workstations, the administrative limit<br />

for the containers was even stricter, allowing only one<br />

ingot regardless <strong>of</strong> its mass. Workstation 1391-A was<br />

used for extracting drill samples (up to 0.1 g) for<br />

chemical analysis <strong>of</strong> the impurities. The ingots were<br />

weighed in workstation 1391-B, where the samples<br />

were also temporarily stored. Workstation 1392 was<br />

used for measuring the dimensions <strong>of</strong> the ingots.<br />

Within the workstations the ingots were removed and<br />

returned to their original containers one at a time. The<br />

workstations were equipped with pass–through ports in<br />

the connecting walls, gloveports, and 50 mm thick<br />

leaded glass windows. The front <strong>of</strong> the workstation<br />

had a 30 mm thick lead shield to reduce the γ-radiation<br />

from the plutonium.<br />

At the beginning <strong>of</strong> the shift on 13 December 1978,<br />

three containers were in workstation 1391-B, and four<br />

containers were in workstation 1392, each with one<br />

ingot. The ingots are numbered sequentially in<br />

Figure 29 for the purpose <strong>of</strong> the discussion that<br />

follows. Although the containers are depicted as being<br />

linearly arranged, in actuality the containers holding<br />

ingots 4 and 5 were behind those with ingots 6 and 7,<br />

making visual inspection <strong>of</strong> the contents more difficult<br />

7 6 5 4 3 2 1<br />

Glovebox 12<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!