09.12.2012 Views

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In the final experiment, the critical number <strong>of</strong> fuel<br />

rods with the smallest pitch (7.2 mm) was measured.<br />

This number was 1,790 and exceeded the minimum<br />

critical number <strong>of</strong> rods for an optimum pitch by<br />

approximately 7 times.<br />

After the experiment was finished, the supervisor <strong>of</strong><br />

the experimental team ordered the insertion <strong>of</strong> all<br />

control and emergency protection rods and the neutron<br />

source was removed from the core. Four staff members<br />

entered the critical assembly compartment for examination.<br />

The supervisor then ordered the water be<br />

removed through the fast dumping (emergency) valve.<br />

The water from the critical assembly tank could<br />

have been drained through the slow dumping valve in<br />

15 to 20 minutes or through the fast dumping valve in<br />

20 to 30 seconds. After the previous experiments, the<br />

water had been drained through the slow dumping<br />

valve.<br />

The plexiglas support plate almost completely<br />

covered the tank section, and the size <strong>of</strong> the gap<br />

between the plate edge and tank wall was less than the<br />

size <strong>of</strong> the fast dumping valve outlet. For this reason,<br />

upon initiating the fast dumping operation, the<br />

Plexiglas base plate sagged and the fuel rods fell out <strong>of</strong><br />

the upper lattice plate (Figure 61). The fuel rods<br />

separated into a fan shaped array in which the pitch<br />

between the rods came close to optimum and the lattice<br />

went highly supercritical. The rate <strong>of</strong> reactivity<br />

insertion was calculated to have reached ~2 β eff /s.<br />

13. The RA-2 Facility, 23 September 1983 79<br />

The RA–2 Facility was located in Buenos Aires,<br />

Argentina. Control rods for this essentially zero power<br />

experimental reactor assembly were MTR elements in<br />

which 4 <strong>of</strong> the 19 fuel plates were removed and<br />

replaced by 2 cadmium plates. Just outside the fueled<br />

region (approximately 305 mm × 380 mm) was a<br />

graphite reflector approximately 75 mm thick. The<br />

large reactor vessel was filled with de-mineralized<br />

water during operations and was supposed to be<br />

drained during changes in fuel configurations when<br />

people were required to be present.<br />

The technician, a qualified operator with 14 years<br />

experience, was alone in the reactor room making a<br />

change in the fuel configuration. The moderator had<br />

not been drained from the tank, though required by<br />

During the criticality accident, two peripheral rows<br />

<strong>of</strong> fuel rods were destroyed by the energy release.<br />

Fragments <strong>of</strong> these fuel rods resembled welding rod<br />

fragments. Water splashed out <strong>of</strong> the tank. The energy<br />

release in the burst, estimated from the core radioactivity,<br />

was ~5 × 10 18 fissions. This value is, in all probability,<br />

universal for uranium–water systems in an open<br />

tank under conditions <strong>of</strong> rapid reactivity insertion.<br />

Excursions <strong>of</strong> this type are terminated due to fuel<br />

destruction or loss <strong>of</strong> water.<br />

Radioactive contamination <strong>of</strong> the critical assembly<br />

room was minimal and there was no contamination <strong>of</strong><br />

the outer premises; however, the accident consequences<br />

were tragic for the personnel involved. A<br />

technician, who was close to the tank when the pulse<br />

occurred received a radiation dose <strong>of</strong> ~6,000 rem and<br />

died 5 days after the accident. The supervisor received<br />

2,000 rem and died in 15 days. Two other staff<br />

members inside the critical assembly room received<br />

doses <strong>of</strong> 700 –800 rem. Physicians managed to save<br />

their lives but both suffered long term health effects.<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the critical assembly was the<br />

main cause <strong>of</strong> the accident. No calculations were<br />

performed for the components <strong>of</strong> the system and the<br />

construction as a whole. Improper and hasty actions by<br />

personnel during the final stage <strong>of</strong> the experiment also<br />

contributed to the cause <strong>of</strong> the accident.<br />

MTR–type fuel element, water reflected, assembly; single excursion; one fatality, two significant exposures.<br />

procedures. Two fuel elements had been placed just<br />

outside the graphite, instead <strong>of</strong> being removed completely<br />

from the tank. Two <strong>of</strong> the control elements,<br />

without the cadmium plates installed, were being<br />

placed in the fuel configuration. Apparently, criticality<br />

occurred as the second <strong>of</strong> these was being installed,<br />

since it was found only partially inserted.<br />

The excursion consisted <strong>of</strong> 3 to 4.5 × 10 17 fissions;<br />

the operator received an absorbed dose <strong>of</strong> about<br />

2000 rad from gamma-rays and 1700 rad from neutron.<br />

This exposure was highly non–uniform, with the upper<br />

right side <strong>of</strong> the body receiving the larger exposure.<br />

The operator survived for 2 days. Two people in the<br />

control room received doses <strong>of</strong> about 15 rad from<br />

neutrons and 20 rad gamma–rays. Six others received<br />

lesser doses, down to 1 rad, and 9 received less than<br />

1 rad.<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!