09.12.2012 Views

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

A Review of Criticality Accidents A Review of Criticality Accidents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

completed the construction <strong>of</strong> the lower half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

assembly on the table (Figure 56). This lower half<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> the copper reflector (with an outside<br />

diameter <strong>of</strong> 258 mm since that was all that was<br />

available) and a uranium core (9 spherical layers, with<br />

an inside diameter <strong>of</strong> 28 mm and an outside diameter<br />

<strong>of</strong> 167 mm) with a neutron source (~10 5 n/s) placed in<br />

its center. As he went to position the first upper copper<br />

hemishell (with an inside and outside diameters <strong>of</strong><br />

167 mm and 183 mm, respectively) into place it<br />

dropped onto the bottom assembly. This led to the<br />

initial prompt critical spike and the ~6.5 day excursion.<br />

The automatic scram system activated and dropped the<br />

table to its down position 60 but otherwise had no effect<br />

on the supercritical assembly. After the initial fission<br />

burst, the assembly eventually reached steady state<br />

power conditions.<br />

Seeing a flash <strong>of</strong> light, the experimenter left the<br />

experimental cell, shutting the safety door behind him.<br />

He reported the accident to the engineer and attending<br />

health physicist who were in the control room at the<br />

time. The head <strong>of</strong> the laboratory and the facility chief<br />

were then notified by phone. The facility chief arrived<br />

shortly thereafter, at which time the experimenter<br />

related the composition and dimensions <strong>of</strong> the assembly<br />

as documented in his logbook. 60<br />

The accident burst conditions were reproduced from<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> the assembly’s neutron flux (19 June<br />

1997) and from computations shown in Figure 57<br />

Support<br />

Core<br />

(HEU)<br />

Reflector<br />

(copper)<br />

Neutron<br />

Source<br />

Figure 56. Accident configuration.<br />

(these computations were performed by<br />

Dr. V. F. Kolesov and Dr. V. Kh. Khoruzhy). The<br />

asymptotic power was estimated to be 480 watts,<br />

corresponding to an event with an initial excess<br />

reactivity 6.5 ¢ above prompt critical, i.e.,<br />

∆k = 0.00745. The initial superprompt critical spike <strong>of</strong><br />

~4 × 10 15 fissions was followed by a subprompt critical<br />

excursion lasting 3 to 5 minutes and generating<br />

~2 × 10 17 fissions. This second excursion was followed<br />

by highly damped power oscillations separated by<br />

about 40 minute intervals. Several hours afterwards,<br />

the assembly power, and the core and reflector temperatures<br />

had reached equilibrium levels. The temperature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the uranium core was estimated to have been<br />

865°C.<br />

The excursion was terminated around 00:45 on<br />

24 June 1997 when a vacuum gripper was used to<br />

remove most <strong>of</strong> the assembly from the stand, leaving<br />

only the outermost lower copper hemishell in place.<br />

The removed portion <strong>of</strong> the assembly was placed onto<br />

a support stand in the room (Figure 58). All the<br />

recovery operations were done remotely.<br />

Later, another two hemishells from the lower<br />

reflector were removed, and the system was then<br />

separated into two parts and packaged into containers.<br />

After the γ-radiation decreased to allowable levels, it<br />

was planned to further disassemble the system (into<br />

single components) to restore the damaged coppernickel<br />

protective coating on fissile material parts.<br />

Ring<br />

Assembly<br />

Support<br />

Support<br />

Pipe<br />

Lower Support<br />

Hydraulic Lift<br />

Carriage<br />

Cart<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!