DISSERTATION
resolver
resolver
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
_____________________________________________________________ Results and Discussion<br />
Figure 3.20. a) Potential-time dependence representing potential pulses during potentialassisted<br />
immobilization and b) corresponding current-time response.<br />
It becomes evident that in order to find an efficient pulse profile the following conditions need<br />
to be satisfied:<br />
- to find appropriate pulse intensities<br />
- to find an appropriate pulse duration<br />
Applied potential intensities need to be on the one hand within the stable potential window of<br />
the Au-S bond and on the other hand high enough to evoke an efficient stirring to bring the<br />
DNA towards the surface. Namely, even though according to the G-C theory the potential drop<br />
in front of the electrode is steeper for higher applied potentials, the absolute value of the<br />
potential Φ at a fixed distance from the electrode is higher for a higher applied potential (i.e.,<br />
potential at the OHP, Φ0). This difference is more pronounced in close proximity to the<br />
electrode surface. To demonstrate the influence of potential intensities in a pulse profile on the<br />
efficiency of the immobilization process, different pulse profiles were compared (Figures 3.21<br />
and 3.22). For the purpose of this study the total duration of the immobilization was kept<br />
constant to 15 min and the pulse duration was kept at 10 ms. Using the same upper potential<br />
(0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl/3 M KCl) and varying the lower potential, three potential differences were<br />
defined: 300 mV (0.5/0.2 V pulse profile), 500 mV (0.5/0 V pulse profile) and 700 mV (0.5/-<br />
0.2 V pulse profile). Figure 3.21 shows how the chosen potential differences relate to both pzc<br />
3.3 Importance of controlling the surface 55