12.01.2017 Views

DISSERTATION

resolver

resolver

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

_____________________________________________________________ Results and Discussion<br />

formed in the electrolyte in order to compensate for this excess charge. A potential profile is<br />

formed and the potential decays with the distance from the electrode as it is explained in Section<br />

1.2.2. Even though the Gouy-Chapman double layer theory does not take into account the linear<br />

potential drop within the Helmholtz plane, it shows the difference in the system response in<br />

relation to parameters such as the ionic strength of the solution or the applied potential. In order<br />

to increase the immobilization kinetics and DNA coverage, DNA immobilization is often<br />

performed in solutions of high ionic strength. However, according to the GC model, the<br />

potential drop is steeper with increasing ionic strength. Therefore, under conditions of high<br />

ionic strength a significant potential drop is observed in the immediate proximity of the<br />

electrode surface. Thus, only a small fraction of a DNA strand in close vicinity of the electrode<br />

can be affected by the applied potential.<br />

Moreover, DNA is a highly negatively charged polyelectrolyte that strongly interacts with<br />

surrounding ions resulting in charge compensation, i.e., DNA screening (described in Section<br />

1.2.1). In the case of monovalent cations, the charge at a DNA strand is screened by counterions<br />

accumulating around the DNA strand in two layers, namely a condensed layer and additional<br />

ions in a second sphere 34 . Therefore, due to the absence of an effective net charge, a DNA strand<br />

cannot be directly affected by the applied potential as it is generally suggested.<br />

These observations imply that the polarized electrode neither attracts nor repels DNA strands<br />

directly, but rather affects the ions in the vicinity of the electrified interface. Namely, during<br />

the charging of the electrochemical double layer, ions have to rearrange in both Helmholtz<br />

planes and the diffuse layer. Thus, when the electrode is polarized to negative values with<br />

respect to the pzc, cations move towards the electrified interface while anions move towards<br />

the bulk of the solution and vice versa. This suggests that switching fast enough between these<br />

two situations creates a “stirring effect” that effectively exceeds the Debye length in front of<br />

the electrified interface. Furthermore, efficient stirring should also move DNA strands present<br />

in close proximity to the electrode surface including their condensed ion cloud. This way the<br />

immobilization will not be diffusion controlled but driven by the migration of ions in front of<br />

the electrode. Based on this hypothesis, we created a potential pulse-assisted immobilization<br />

method that consists of fast switching between potentials more positive and more negative with<br />

respect to the pzc. Figure 3.20 demonstrates the principle of the measurements conducted<br />

during this study.<br />

3.3 Importance of controlling the surface 54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!