12.01.2017 Views

DISSERTATION

resolver

resolver

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

_____________________________________________________________<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

replaced by the capacitance of the DNA monolayer (CDNA). Cd is represented by the following<br />

equation:<br />

1<br />

= 1 + 1<br />

(3.6)<br />

C d C DNA C ddl<br />

Upon DNA immobilization, Cd (Figure 3.16) and subsequently Cddl values (Figure 3.17) were<br />

obtained in relation to the applied potential using PDEIS. In this case, the investigated potential<br />

range was shifted to -0.4 V to 0.5 V (vs. Ag/AgCl/3 M KCl) to avoid the cleavage of the Au-S<br />

bond at higher potentials. The pzc (DNA) was determined to be around 0.1 V (vs. Ag/AgCl/3<br />

M KCl) showing that the pzc shifts to more negative values due to the surface modification<br />

with DNA. Unlike in the case of the bare polycrystalline gold electrode, for the DNA-modified<br />

electrode a well-defined minimum was observed. A possible explanation is a more<br />

homogeneous surface after the modification with the DNA layer. Furthermore, the broad<br />

minimum is in agreement with the GC double layer model that assumes peak broadening with<br />

decreasing ionic strength 43 .<br />

Figure 3.16. Determination of Cd at varying applied potentials at the DNA-modified<br />

electrode. Impedance was measured for two ionic strengths: 10 mM PB with 20 mM<br />

K2SO4 and 0.1 mM PB with 0.2 mM K2SO4. Cd was calculated at a frequency of 10 Hz.<br />

DNA immobilization: 0.5/-0.2 V pulse profile (10 ms pulse duration, vs. Ag/AgCl/3 M<br />

KCl), 5 min in 1 µM DNA solution prepared in 10 mM PB with 450 mM K2SO4. Procedure<br />

explained in the Section 3.3.1.<br />

3.2 Importance of knowing the surface 48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!