12.01.2017 Views

DISSERTATION

resolver

resolver

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

_____________________________________________________________<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Taking into account Equation (3.2), it is assumed that the investigated ionic strengths are not<br />

low enough to result in the desired capacitance minimum from the Cd-E dependence alone.<br />

Namely, for the highest ionic strength (10 mM PB, 20 mM K2SO4) Ci dominates the overall<br />

capacitance response, however, at the lowest investigated ionic strength (0.1 mM PB, 0.2 mM<br />

K2SO4) obviously contributions from both Ci and Cddl are significant. Therefore, by subtraction<br />

of these two values Cddl can be obtained:<br />

1<br />

C ddl =<br />

1<br />

C<br />

− 1 (3.5)<br />

d C i<br />

Finally, by plotting the Cddl-E dependence (Figure 3.15), the pzc can be determined from the<br />

capacitance minimum at a potential of 0.5 V (vs. Ag/AgCl/3 M KCl), where the most<br />

pronounced minimum is observed for a frequency of 100 Hz. The non-ideal U-shape of the<br />

obtained curves is probably a consequence of the polycrystalline nature of the gold surfaces and<br />

the contribution of all crystallographic facets.<br />

Figure 3.15. Determination of the pzc of the bare gold electrode. Cddl values were<br />

calculated using the data from Figure 3.14 for different frequencies.<br />

To investigate the effect of the modification of the surface with DNA on the pzc value,<br />

determination of the pzc (pztc) of the DNA-modified electrode (pzc (DNA)) was performed.<br />

This was done in the same manner as for the pzc determination of bare gold, except that Ci was<br />

3.2 Importance of knowing the surface 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!