12.01.2017 Views

DISSERTATION

resolver

resolver

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

______________________________________________________________________ Introduction<br />

1.3 DNA immobilization<br />

1.3.1 DNA immobilization approaches<br />

A DNA immobilization strategy is determined by the substrate material used for the attachment.<br />

Over the years, various surfaces were investigated for immobilization of DNA such as among<br />

others the hanging mercury drop electrode, carbonaceous materials, boron-doped diamond,<br />

silver, platinum and gold. Initially, research on DNA was conducted solely on mercury drop<br />

electrodes (in the beginning of the 1970s) and carbon electrodes (since the middle of the<br />

1970s 46 ). Later, gold electrodes became popular, as the chemisorption of thiol-tethered DNA<br />

showed to be a very promising method for the preparation of DNA sensors.<br />

With respect to the type of bond formed during immobilization, DNA immobilization methods<br />

are characterized by three main mechanisms 47 : physisorption, covalent immobilization and<br />

chemisorption.<br />

Physisorption is the simplest immobilization method, which is based on the adsorption of<br />

unmodified oligonucleotides on an electrode through electrostatic forces, van der Waals<br />

interactions, hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions. The immobilization occurs either<br />

through nucleic bases (immobilization of ssDNA, Figure 1.9, a) or the phosphate backbone<br />

(dsDNA, Figure 1.9, b). It is characterized by a multiple site attachment, which allows for the<br />

investigation of direct DNA oxidation and reduction. The main drawback of this method is its<br />

sensitivity on environmental changes (pH value, temperature, ionic strength) due to the weak<br />

attachment. Furthermore, attachment of the DNA occurs via multiple points, which prevents<br />

further hybridization due to the restricted configurational freedom of physisorbed DNA 48 .<br />

Carbonaceous materials and the mercury drop electrode were mostly utilized for this<br />

immobilization technique.<br />

Covalent immobilization results in a much stronger binding between the surface and DNA<br />

(Figure 1.9, c). Another advantage of this method is the appropriate orientation of the probe<br />

DNA due to the end-point attachment of ssDNA, which facilitates hybridization. In order for<br />

the immobilization to occur, the immobilization surface (chemically or electrochemically) and<br />

the DNA itself need to be activated, which presents a drawback of this method. Activation of<br />

1.3 DNA immobilization 16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!