phainomena

Recommendations

Info

PHAINOMENA XXV/98-99 THE HORIZONS OF EMBODIMENT 82 Seyfarth, Robert M. and Cheney, Dorothy L. (2002): “The Structure of Social Knowledge in Monkeys”, in: The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition, Marc Bekoff, Colin Allen and Gordon M. Burghardt (eds.), 379–384. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Smith, David J. and Washburn, David (2005): “Uncertainty Monitoring and Metacognition by Animals”, Current Directions in Psychological Science 14, 19–24. Stanford, Craig (2001): Significant Others: The Ape-Human Continuum and the Quest for Human Nature, New York: Basic Books. Steiner, Gary (2008): Animals and the Moral Community. Mental Life, Moral Status, and Kinship, New York: Columbia University Press. Strasser, Anna (2012): “How Minimal Can Self-Consciousness Be?”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 84, 39–62. Tye, Michael (2000): Consciousness, Color, and Content, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. White, Thomas I. (2007): In Defense of Dolphins: The New Moral Frontier, Oxford: Blackwell. Wild, Markus (2008): Tierphilosophie zur Einführung, Hamburg: Junius. Zahavi, Dan (2002): “First-Person Thoughts and Embodied Self-Awareness: Some Reflections on the Relation between Recent Analytical Philosophy and Phenomenology”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1, 7–26. Zahavi, Dan (2005): Subjectivity and Selfhood. Investigating the First-Person Perspective, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Zahavi, Dan (2012): “The Time of the Self ”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 84, 143–159. Zahavi, Dan and Kriegel, Uriah (2016): “For-Me-Ness: What It Is and What It Is Not”, in: Philosophy of Mind and Phenomenology: Conceptual and Empirical Approaches, Daniel O. Dahlstrom, Andreas Elpidorou and Walter Hopp (eds.), 36–53. London/New York: Routledge.
Toma Strle EMBODIED, ENACTED AND EXPERIENCED DECISION-MAKING 1. Introduction 83 The considerations that guide this paper mainly come from the realization of how limited our understanding of decision-making actually is. We have little knowledge about how common people make decisions in their everyday lives. We have almost no insight into how the process of decision-making looks and unfolds from the experiential perspective of decision-makers – how they understand (and create) uncertainties, outcomes, consequences, etc. We do not even know whether people interpret situations that are perceived as decision situations from a third-person perspective as decision situations in the first place. Having to rely mostly on behavioral and neural data gathered in very specific and restricted decision situations forces us to postulate abstract theories and models about what is going on in the minds of decision-makers, when in fact we have little assurance that they correspond to how people go about deciding (in the lab, or in everyday life). All in all, we have little understanding of what sense and meaning decision-making has for decisionmakers, and thus have a very limited understanding of the phenomenon at best. The goals of this paper are to show that mainstream approaches to studying decision-making – accepting assumptions of traditional cognitive science and
Page 1 and 2:
phainomena THE HORIZONS OF EMBODIME
Page 3:
THE HORIZONS OF EMBODIMENT Corporea
Page 6 and 7:
PHAINOMENA XXV/98-99 THE HORIZONS O
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33: PHAINOMENA XXV/98-99 THE HORIZONS O
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
202
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
260 PHAINOMENA XXV/98-99
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268:
Page 271 and 272:
e-ISSN 2232-6650 UDK 1 PHAINOMENA R
show all

phainomena

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?