03.01.2017 Views

phainomena

PHAINOMENA-98-99_e-verzija

PHAINOMENA-98-99_e-verzija

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

POVZETKI/ABSTRACTS<br />

Sebastjan Vörös , Peter Gaitsch (eds.)<br />

The Horizons of Embodiment: Corporeality in Humans,<br />

Animals, and Beyond<br />

In the past two decades, the notion of embodiment has been quickly gaining<br />

currency in cognitive science and philosophy of mind. Although virtually<br />

unknown at the beginning of the 1990’s, it has now become, in the guise of<br />

embodied and enactive cognitive science, a serious contender against the<br />

classical (cognitivist) conceptions of mind, cognition, and consciousness. By<br />

drawing on the thematizations of the body found in Husserl and Merleau-<br />

Ponty, especially on the distinction between body as lived body (Leib) – a prereflective<br />

bodily awareness that shapes our experiential landscape –, and body<br />

as physical body (Körper) – a thematic experience of the body as an object –,<br />

it is maintained that mind and cognition are embodied in a twofold sense:<br />

(i) structurally, i.e., in the sense of being constituted by extracranial (neural,<br />

bodily, environmental, and social) processes, and (ii) phenomenologically, i.e.,<br />

in the sense of including the experience of oneself as a bodily agent situated in<br />

the world. It is contended that this Janus-faced nature of corporeality, divided<br />

between “being a body” (Leibsein) and “having a body” (Körperhaben),<br />

may help undermine some of the age-old dualities (mind-body, interiorityexteriority,<br />

etc.) and thereby help anchor experience in materiality and<br />

materiality in experience.<br />

The main focus of the volume at hand is to analyze, evaluate, and<br />

critically reflect upon, what might be termed “horizons of embodiment”.<br />

First, it purports to examine the scope and applicability of the notion of<br />

embodiment in relation to not only human, but also animal, vegetative, and<br />

perhaps even artificial life. Specifically, it aims to investigate to what extent,<br />

if at all, different construals of embodiment might contribute to a better<br />

understanding of different life forms – of their unique, if tentative, modes<br />

of being, cognizing, and experiencing. Second, it purports to examine, from<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!