ENFORCEMENT
eop_ipec_jointstrategicplan_hi-res
eop_ipec_jointstrategicplan_hi-res
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement<br />
SECTION 3<br />
transaction costs for rights owners and authorized<br />
intermediaries along the supply chain.<br />
ACTION NO. 3.13: Engage with rights holders<br />
on technological solutions to aid in interdiction<br />
efforts. CBP, the National Intellectual Property<br />
Rights Center (IPR Center), IPEC, and other<br />
interested Federal agencies will meet at least<br />
annually with industry stakeholders to discuss<br />
potential new opportunities for employing<br />
technology to enhance identification and<br />
investigation of illicit trade.<br />
ACTION NO. 3.14: Hold a “State of<br />
Authentication Technology” conference. The<br />
U.S. Interagency Strategy Planning Committees<br />
on IP Enforcement, in coordination with DARPA,<br />
the National Science Foundation, the National<br />
Institutes of Health, the U.S. Army Research<br />
Office, and other interested agencies, will<br />
organize and host a conference on the state<br />
of authentication technology. In addition to<br />
providing a forum for information sharing<br />
among Federal agencies, the conference will<br />
focus on development of and research into<br />
authentication technologies and opportunities<br />
for public sector adoption and deployment of<br />
authentication technologies.<br />
8. Enhance Interdiction Through Specialized<br />
Task Forces.<br />
While CBP generally trains all officers to identify<br />
illicit and pirated goods, practical limitations exist.<br />
For example, CBP officers are tasked with enforcing<br />
hundreds of laws. As a result, each officer is not<br />
necessarily a specialist at identifying counterfeit and<br />
pirated products, nor is every officer aware of the<br />
tactics and trends used to conceal illicit goods and<br />
evade detection.<br />
Over a period of years, the use of specialized IPR<br />
task force personnel within CBP to identify and interdict<br />
counterfeit and pirated goods could result in significant<br />
intellectual property rights enforcement achievements.<br />
By increasing a team’s knowledge of industry-specific<br />
issues, and adapting team composition to new trends<br />
identified in the trading environment, specialized task<br />
forces enable law enforcement personnel to quickly<br />
pivot to effectively address emerging risks.<br />
CBP’s Mobile Intellectual Property Enforcement<br />
Teams (MIPETs) highlight the significant enhancements<br />
to IPR enforcement made possible through the use<br />
of specialized task force personnel. MIPETs were<br />
developed by CBP as a way to combine the forces<br />
of agency IPR enforcement experts and frontline<br />
field personnel for aggressive, heightened targeted<br />
enforcement efforts—or “blitzes”—to maximize<br />
interdictions during a specific period of time. 22 With<br />
subject-matter experts available to quickly analyze the<br />
current state of IPR enforcement efforts at a port and<br />
serve as resources to field personnel during intense<br />
screening efforts, CBP is able to proactively and flexibly<br />
combat intellectual property crimes.<br />
Opportunities exist to further support specialized IPR<br />
enforcement units and ensure that these mobile operations<br />
have a lasting impact on a host port by increasing staff<br />
knowledge of the dynamic nature of IPR-based illicit trade,<br />
practicing interdiction best practices and tactics, and<br />
establishing a benchmark for attainable seizure rates.<br />
ACTION NO. 3.15: Expand the use of IPR<br />
task forces at POEs. Within one year of the<br />
issuance of this Plan, CBP will produce a plan<br />
for expanding the use of flexible, standing IPR<br />
enforcement task forces, such as MIPET, for<br />
deployment as needed in support of agency<br />
efforts to interdict counterfeit and pirated goods<br />
at all POEs. CBP will further assess ports following<br />
IPR enforcement task force actions to determine<br />
the effect on long-term interdiction rates.<br />
9. Enhance Fines, Penalties, and Forfeiture<br />
Processes and Practices.<br />
Trade in counterfeit and pirated goods is viewed as a<br />
low-risk, high-reward criminal activity since the likelihood<br />
of detection is viewed as low and the penalties imposed<br />
after detection can be difficult to collect from violators.<br />
As a result, if a seizure does not lead to civil penalties<br />
or criminal prosecution, the illicit actor’s only cost is the<br />
loss of the seized shipment. Enforcement activities must<br />
endeavor to deter illicit conduct and reduce the overall<br />
profitability of counterfeit operations that undermine<br />
markets, public safety, and the rule of law.<br />
Under Federal law CBP is authorized, after seizure<br />
and forfeiture, to assess civil penalties (fines) against<br />
any person found to import counterfeit merchandise for<br />
104